@cenkuygur@AnaKasparian and the @theyoungturks broadcast on the @OPCW /Douma/Syria chlorine chemical weapon controversy presents a distorted & factually inaccurate account and, as such, misleads its viewers. Some key points in this thread:-
1) First, the broadcast ignores the now sizeable number of experts/opinion leaders who have raised questions regarding this issue e.g. the @couragefoundation panel in 2019 heard from an @opcw official and reported scientific and procedural flaws: couragefound.org/2019/10/analyt…
2) This led to an open letter, signed by many experts including Jose Bustani, the first director general of the @opcw, calling for all the Douma inspectors to be heard couragefound.org/wp-content/upl…
3) More recently a Statement of Concern signed by 28 experts/opinion leaders, and including 5 former @opcw officials, call again for the @opcw to address the concerns raised by @opcw inspectors. berlingroup21.org
4) British was hero Lord Admiral West was one signatory to this Statement of Concern and he was interviewed by UK journalist @ClarkeMicah here dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
5) Another prominent signatory was former US congress person Tulsi Gabbard who was interviewed about the statement of concern here:-
6) The factual omissions/errors in the broadcast are serious and pertain to misrepresentation of toxicology and ballistics issues. Regarding toxicology, leaked minutes of a meeting with NATO toxicologists concluded that these civilians were not killed by chlorine gas
7) The leaked minutes and the leaked original interim report (see @wikileaks) explain that chlorine does not cause *immediate* death *and* pulmonary oedema (which can cause the foaming at the mouth) wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
8) This critical finding, however, appears to be misunderstood by the interviewee in the broadcast by @tyt@AnaKasparian@cenkuygur. For clarity, it is spelled out here in a forthcoming report @CL4Syr@MichaKobs
9) The two key ballistics issues are also ignored in the broadcast. These issues relate to the chlorine cylinders at location 2 (left) and location 4 (right) allegedly dropped from Syrian Air Force helicopters
10) The first relates to the incompatibility between the damage to the steel reinforcement bars and the cylinders. At Location 2 we see a rebar that supposedly stopped the cylinder leaving no marks on the cylinder head whilst other rebars are bent though greater than 90 degrees
11) The Final @opcw report provides no explanation for this and obfuscates the fairly obvious conclusion that what one is observing at location 2 is a hole created by an explosive shell/mortar round
12) As well as the incompatibility w.r.t. damage on the cylinder and the steel rebars also applying to the cylinder at location 4, here we also have the unexplained bounce
13) The final douma report provides the following (mathematically incorrect) and clearly inadequate attempt to explain this remarkable feat:
14) @cenkuygur and @AnaKasparian spend time discussing with the interviewee claims that the Russian and the Syrian government engaged in witness tampering w.r.t. the 'Damascus' witnesses. No mention is made of allegations/evidence of tampering/staging by opposition groups.
15) For example, BBC producer @Dalatrm claims that, following detailed research, he can confirm that the hospital scenes associated with the alleged attack were staged by white helmets/opposition groups:-
16) Also relevant here is this tweet which notes that the man filmed at the staged (according to Dalati) hospital scenes taking pictures was also caught in single/few frames from the film at Location 2 filming the deceased:
17) We also know that the cylinder at Location 2 was manipulated: As @MichaKobs shows here, the cylinder was rotated through 180 degrees and tilted so that the nozzle is pointing into the hole:-
18) Other questions have now arisen w.r.t. witness testimony from "country x" witnesses (arranged via (and including) White Helmets). The leaked original interim report shows 'country x' witnesses reported some symptoms only associated with nerve agent poisoning
19) The leaked original interim report also confirms that some witnesses reported finding deceased in basements even though this was never corroborated or explained (there was no direct route for the chlorine to pass into the basement at location 2) wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
20) Equally worrying is the fact that we now know there are inconsistent claims being made as to who buried between 50 and 300 dead civilians in a mass grave following the alleged chemical attack.
21) Here, these 'civil society leaders' from Douma claim there were 187 dead from Douma and all found in basements. trtworld.com/video/news-vid…. As @CL4Syr points out, one of them was involved in the Ghouta 2013 chemical attack.
22) We also know that some of the deceased were 're-positioned' during the night of 7/8 April and that there were question marks regarding the authenticity of some of the observed foam:-
34) Given all of these issues it is not surprising that many experts are calling for the @opcw to allow an objective and transparent review of the Douma investigation and which includes *all* the inspectors involved with investigation. berlingroup21.org/bg21-proposal
35) It is also not surprising that mainstream media and western governments have blocked or suppressed these questions, even blocking first @opcw director general Jose Bustani from speaking at the @un@MaxBlumenthal@aaronjmate:-
That mainstream media like @bbc and @andrewmarr9 can even entertain giving air time to a man who deceived in order to start multiple wars demonstrates how broken our political and media system is. Some reminders:- #NoVaccinePassports
1) Here is Blair conspiring with US president George Bush to attack Iraq, Iran and Syria just weeks after the 9/11 event. opendemocracy.net/piers-robinson…
Dear @INakamitsu and @BWoodward_UN, once again the @opcw Director General has smeared his own inspectors and refused to address key questions regarding the controversial #Douma investigation. The questions remain:-
1) Why was the original interim secretly altered, without the knowledge of the Douma team, and then an attempt made to publish an inaccurate and 'spun' report? See @ClarkeMicah report on this hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2019/11/new-se…
2) Why was the key conclusion by 4 NATO toxicologists that the 43 deceased at Douma were not killed by chlorine at Location 2 expunged from the Final FFM Report? Consultation minutes are here wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…@CL4Syr@MichaKobs
@thomasphipps, you seem to suffer from a rather limited vocabulary .... 'useful idiot', 'war crime denier' when talking about the alleged Douma attack. Perhaps you would like to, on behalf of the UK government, answer the following questions:- @OPCW@DanyaChaikel@SaretaAshraph
1) Why was the key conclusion by 4 NATO chem. weapon experts that the 43 deceased at Douma were not killed by chlorine gas at Location 2 censored in the Final OPCW report? You can read the minutes from the consultation here:- wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
2) It concluded that chlorine gas would not have caused these civilians to drop dead on the spot, gathering in piles.
Yes, and for the record, I think the interview and accompanying article in @offguardian have aged rather well, one might say the analysis was right on the money!:-
And I note, with some hilarity, that it is the corporate 'liberal' media who are today peddling little green men stories 😂😂 ...well done folks, keep up the good work 🤨
@bellingcat & @N_Waters89 continue attempts to smear @OPCW whistleblowers & all those raising questions about the investigation of the alleged chemical weapon attack in Douma/Syria 2018 and, most seriously, suppress the truth about this event. @ClarkeMicah@2ndNewMoon
2) With respect to the Douma incident itself, remarkably, @bellingcat were caught deleting a tweet that evidenced manipulation of a cylinder allegedly dropped from a Syrian Air Force helicopter, at Location 2:-
As the @opcw's DG has chosen to again spread false information regarding whistleblower scientists from his own organisation, it is worth reminding why so many people, eminent and otherwise, are concerned about the Douma investigation @aaronjmate@PaulWalkerGG@ambLisaHelfand:-
2) It is also now established that a toxicology assessment from NATO experts, which ruled out chlorine gas as the cause of 43 deaths at Location 2, was effectively deleted from the Final Report @DarylGKimball