@cenkuygur @AnaKasparian and the @theyoungturks broadcast on the @OPCW /Douma/Syria chlorine chemical weapon controversy presents a distorted & factually inaccurate account and, as such, misleads its viewers. Some key points in this thread:-
1) First, the broadcast ignores the now sizeable number of experts/opinion leaders who have raised questions regarding this issue e.g. the @couragefoundation panel in 2019 heard from an @opcw official and reported scientific and procedural flaws: couragefound.org/2019/10/analyt…
2) This led to an open letter, signed by many experts including Jose Bustani, the first director general of the @opcw, calling for all the Douma inspectors to be heard couragefound.org/wp-content/upl…
3) More recently a Statement of Concern signed by 28 experts/opinion leaders, and including 5 former @opcw officials, call again for the @opcw to address the concerns raised by @opcw inspectors. berlingroup21.org
4) British was hero Lord Admiral West was one signatory to this Statement of Concern and he was interviewed by UK journalist @ClarkeMicah here dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
5) Another prominent signatory was former US congress person Tulsi Gabbard who was interviewed about the statement of concern here:-
6) The factual omissions/errors in the broadcast are serious and pertain to misrepresentation of toxicology and ballistics issues. Regarding toxicology, leaked minutes of a meeting with NATO toxicologists concluded that these civilians were not killed by chlorine gas
7) The leaked minutes and the leaked original interim report (see @wikileaks) explain that chlorine does not cause *immediate* death *and* pulmonary oedema (which can cause the foaming at the mouth) wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
8) This critical finding, however, appears to be misunderstood by the interviewee in the broadcast by @tyt @AnaKasparian @cenkuygur. For clarity, it is spelled out here in a forthcoming report @CL4Syr @MichaKobs
9) The two key ballistics issues are also ignored in the broadcast. These issues relate to the chlorine cylinders at location 2 (left) and location 4 (right) allegedly dropped from Syrian Air Force helicopters
10) The first relates to the incompatibility between the damage to the steel reinforcement bars and the cylinders. At Location 2 we see a rebar that supposedly stopped the cylinder leaving no marks on the cylinder head whilst other rebars are bent though greater than 90 degrees
11) The Final @opcw report provides no explanation for this and obfuscates the fairly obvious conclusion that what one is observing at location 2 is a hole created by an explosive shell/mortar round
12) As well as the incompatibility w.r.t. damage on the cylinder and the steel rebars also applying to the cylinder at location 4, here we also have the unexplained bounce
13) The final douma report provides the following (mathematically incorrect) and clearly inadequate attempt to explain this remarkable feat:
14) @cenkuygur and @AnaKasparian spend time discussing with the interviewee claims that the Russian and the Syrian government engaged in witness tampering w.r.t. the 'Damascus' witnesses. No mention is made of allegations/evidence of tampering/staging by opposition groups.
15) For example, BBC producer @Dalatrm claims that, following detailed research, he can confirm that the hospital scenes associated with the alleged attack were staged by white helmets/opposition groups:-
16) Also relevant here is this tweet which notes that the man filmed at the staged (according to Dalati) hospital scenes taking pictures was also caught in single/few frames from the film at Location 2 filming the deceased:
17) We also know that the cylinder at Location 2 was manipulated: As @MichaKobs shows here, the cylinder was rotated through 180 degrees and tilted so that the nozzle is pointing into the hole:-
18) Other questions have now arisen w.r.t. witness testimony from "country x" witnesses (arranged via (and including) White Helmets). The leaked original interim report shows 'country x' witnesses reported some symptoms only associated with nerve agent poisoning
19) The leaked original interim report also confirms that some witnesses reported finding deceased in basements even though this was never corroborated or explained (there was no direct route for the chlorine to pass into the basement at location 2) wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
20) Equally worrying is the fact that we now know there are inconsistent claims being made as to who buried between 50 and 300 dead civilians in a mass grave following the alleged chemical attack.
21) Here, these 'civil society leaders' from Douma claim there were 187 dead from Douma and all found in basements. trtworld.com/video/news-vid…. As @CL4Syr points out, one of them was involved in the Ghouta 2013 chemical attack.
22) We also know that some of the deceased were 're-positioned' during the night of 7/8 April and that there were question marks regarding the authenticity of some of the observed foam:-
33) indeed, @ClimateAudit reports that one victim appears to have had foam added *after* her body had been moved. climateaudit.org/2018/04/24/dou…
34) Given all of these issues it is not surprising that many experts are calling for the @opcw to allow an objective and transparent review of the Douma investigation and which includes *all* the inspectors involved with investigation. berlingroup21.org/bg21-proposal
35) It is also not surprising that mainstream media and western governments have blocked or suppressed these questions, even blocking first @opcw director general Jose Bustani from speaking at the @un @MaxBlumenthal @aaronjmate:-
36) Unfortunately @cenkuygur @AnaKasparian have helped support this campaign of censorship and coverup by airing a demonstrably flawed episode of @tyt. @2ndNewMoon @Tim_Hayward_ @McCormack_Tara

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Piers Robinson

Piers Robinson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PiersRobinson1

7 Jun
That mainstream media like @bbc and @andrewmarr9 can even entertain giving air time to a man who deceived in order to start multiple wars demonstrates how broken our political and media system is. Some reminders:- #NoVaccinePassports
1) Here is Blair conspiring with US president George Bush to attack Iraq, Iran and Syria just weeks after the 9/11 event. opendemocracy.net/piers-robinson…
2) And here they are plotting to attack Iraq, again just weeks after the 9/11 event. @Tim_Hayward_ @McCormack_Tara eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/112107/
Read 11 tweets
4 Jun
Dear @INakamitsu and @BWoodward_UN, once again the @opcw Director General has smeared his own inspectors and refused to address key questions regarding the controversial #Douma investigation. The questions remain:-
1) Why was the original interim secretly altered, without the knowledge of the Douma team, and then an attempt made to publish an inaccurate and 'spun' report? See @ClarkeMicah report on this hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2019/11/new-se…
2) Why was the key conclusion by 4 NATO toxicologists that the 43 deceased at Douma were not killed by chlorine at Location 2 expunged from the Final FFM Report? Consultation minutes are here wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc… @CL4Syr @MichaKobs
Read 23 tweets
25 May
@thomasphipps, you seem to suffer from a rather limited vocabulary .... 'useful idiot', 'war crime denier' when talking about the alleged Douma attack. Perhaps you would like to, on behalf of the UK government, answer the following questions:- @OPCW @DanyaChaikel @SaretaAshraph
1) Why was the key conclusion by 4 NATO chem. weapon experts that the 43 deceased at Douma were not killed by chlorine gas at Location 2 censored in the Final OPCW report? You can read the minutes from the consultation here:- wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc… ImageImage
2) It concluded that chlorine gas would not have caused these civilians to drop dead on the spot, gathering in piles. Image
Read 13 tweets
24 May
Yes, and for the record, I think the interview and accompanying article in @offguardian have aged rather well, one might say the analysis was right on the money!:- @naomirwolf @mcrispinmiller @Tim_Hayward_ @leftworks1
And thanks to @catte_black of @offguardian for publishing and speaking out right from the start.
And I note, with some hilarity, that it is the corporate 'liberal' media who are today peddling little green men stories 😂😂 ...well done folks, keep up the good work 🤨
Read 4 tweets
15 May
@bellingcat & @N_Waters89 continue attempts to smear @OPCW whistleblowers & all those raising questions about the investigation of the alleged chemical weapon attack in Douma/Syria 2018 and, most seriously, suppress the truth about this event. @ClarkeMicah @2ndNewMoon
1) Previously @bellingcat were caught publishing a false letter aimed at discrediting former OPCW inspector Brendan Whelan:- thegrayzone.com/2020/10/28/dra… @aaronjmate @ClarkeMicah
2) With respect to the Douma incident itself, remarkably, @bellingcat were caught deleting a tweet that evidenced manipulation of a cylinder allegedly dropped from a Syrian Air Force helicopter, at Location 2:-
Read 15 tweets
12 May
As the @opcw's DG has chosen to again spread false information regarding whistleblower scientists from his own organisation, it is worth reminding why so many people, eminent and otherwise, are concerned about the Douma investigation @aaronjmate @PaulWalkerGG @ambLisaHelfand:-
1) It is now well known that the original interim report was secretly altered and then an attempt made to publish it. British journalist @ClarkeMicah reported on this in detail in 2019:- @DKWpublichealth @cwccoalition @GERMANYonUN @GermanyDiplo @jpzanders hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2019/11/new-se…
2) It is also now established that a toxicology assessment from NATO experts, which ruled out chlorine gas as the cause of 43 deaths at Location 2, was effectively deleted from the Final Report @DarylGKimball
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(