First, that Lavrov is in the small meeting and not Ushakov is interesting. In the past, Ushakov was always there. Also not standard protocol for the Secretary of State to be the +1, but Blinken has a special relationship with Biden.
Second, striking that General Gerasimov is there. That is highly unusual. His US counterpart is not. That signals to me that strategic stability talks are at top of agenda. And don’t forget, Antonov was chief negotiator of New START treaty.
Third, Peskov is there. Western observers frequently mistaken him as a “press secretary “. He is much more than that to Putin. He’s one of Putins closest advisors. I’ll bet he wants to replace Lavrov someday
Fourth, Kozak is there, again very unusual. He also is close to Putin personally; a@bigger figure than his formal title suggests. There for the Ukraine discussion?
Fifth, Lavrentiev is there, their point on Syria. That’s a good sign. Maybe they’ll get an agreement to extend humanitarian assistance to the Syrian people? Wonder if McGurk Will be a late addition to US side?
Sixth, Ryabkov is there. He’s point at MFA for relations with US. Extremely capable diplomat. Good sign.
Seventh, Patrushev is NOT there. That is striking since he met with Jake Sullivan to prep this meeting. General Patrushev is a hardliner on US. Is his absence a signal that Putin wants a cordial@meeting?
8th, Antonov is there. Ambassadors don’t usually attend meetings in 3ed countries, but he & ambassador Sullivan are in Geneva because they are both going back to work in their respective embassies. That’s the signal at least.
9th, on US side , not as much signaling. The delegations are not symmetric. That’s unusual. Biggest signal in US delegation is Nuland. It’s unusual but not unheard of tp have the Secretary and Undersecretary at same meeting. But US doesn’t have confirmed Assistant Secy yet
Nulands presences is tp signal to Russians and rest of USG that she will be too Biden official in charge of Russia (Campbell at NSC has point on China). Ok, end of my Kremlinology! Comments welcome END THREAD.
Sorry for typos . Doing on the fly from a tv studio I’m Geneva
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I saw the planned schedule of events for tomorrow's Biden-Putin meeting in Geneva tomorrow. 3 details stood out, all good news for Biden. THREAD 1/
First, Putin will arrive first. Biden second. Putin has a habit of showing up late for meetings (He made Obama wait 40 minutes in Los Cabos in 2012.) If Putin is late tomorrow, Biden won't be standing around awkwardly waiting. 2/
Second, there will be no joint press conference. Good. Biden does not need to give Putin a global stage to propagate disinformation or play whataboutism. Let him do that on his own with the Russian press. 3/
"Biden is right to test whether Putin might embrace a more stable, predictable relationship with the United States." THREAD 1/
Should the Russian president opt instead to continue invading countries, mounting hacking and disinformation campaigns, and arresting innocent Russians and Americans, it will be clear that he, not Biden, is responsible for confrontation with the United States. 2/
Biden is also right to try to work with the Kremlin on a limited agenda of mutual interest, particularly on arms control. Even during tense moments of the Cold War, U.S. presidents saw the wisdom in cooperating with their Soviet counterparts to reduce the risk of nuclear war. 3/
"The Biden administration will also need to reform the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which has sustained considerable damage during the Trump era." THREAD 1/
"Washington should not seek to counter Russian propaganda with American propaganda. Rather, it should work to counter disinformation with real reporting from credible journalists in Russia, Ukraine, and other countries in the region." 2/
"To that end, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty should be spun out of the USAGM and made an independent organization, still funded by Congress but with its own board and a sturdier firewall separating it from the federal government." 3/
It’s the last 3 weeks of my son’s high school basketball career, so I’ve been watching a lot of basketball lately and thinking about US-China relations while sitting in the stands. THREAD 1/
When my sons team plays with confidence, they often win. When they don’t play with confidence, they make mistakes, and often lose. 2/
The US needs to play with more confidence when competing against China. Yes, China is a formidable “team”. But better than the US? No. In this competition, we need to play with more confidence and stop believing that China is bound to overtake, let alone “defeat” us. 3/
"In late March 1944, as Stalin’s forces push into Ukraine, young Emil and Adeline Martel must make a terrible decision: " THREAD 1/
"Do they wait for the Soviet bear’s intrusion and risk being sent to Siberia? Or do they reluctantly follow the wolves—murderous Nazi officers who have pledged to protect “pure-blood” Germans?" 2/
"The Martels are one of many families of German heritage whose ancestors have farmed in Ukraine for more than a century." 3/