Dear @ayeshahazarika
I have not attacked you.
I do not engage in mindless cruelty
I do not get off on misgendering trans women, calling them men in dresses or making pathetic, vile comments
Here are some of the things I have written about sex and gender
Here is the article which contributed to me losing my job
Here is a policy proposal that I wrote on GRA reform for how the privacy and dignity of transgender people can be protected while also providing clarity about single sex spaces
I will not attack you for your belief that men can become women.
What I am interested in is the way that people with different beliefs can live together in society - without this coming at the cost of harm to women (by which I mean female people).
As a starting point:
The interests of both female & male people matter.
Evidence is good, as is people talking about differences and disagreements to understand them, and to make sense of the risks, benefits and trade offs of different solutions
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have been in complaints and counter-complaints process with them since Gregor Murray in June 2019 accused me of "abuse" for two tweets, calling me an "anti-trans bigot" and Transgender Trend a "hate group" which they took up
In the Scout Association's latest response (before the judgment) they said that the fact that I defended myself by saying that I would, where appropriate call a man a man, meant that I might not be suitable as a scout leader.
This is my defence of myself to the Scout Association that the employment tribunal (now overturned) said made me "absolutist" and "not worthy of respect".
The same defence was judged by Scouts to make me suspect as a Leader
Dozens of media outlets carry the same statement that "High Court Judge" Mr Justice Choudhury said my views "may well be profoundly offensive and even distressing"
.... but he doesn't say that in the judgment at all.
The ability of the public to bring JRs is important.
And there are permissions hearings and cost orders to deter the vexatious and frivolous.
I do think @CrowdJustice has been unwise to flex its own self-regulation for the Good Law Project.
Normally the rules require the "case owner" is the claimant and their lawyers sign off on the case page. But for GLP these constraints and quality control are removed.
The purpose of the Freedom of Information Act is to keep information about our relationship with public bodies that could cause reputational damage out of the public domain
The purpose of the Charities Act is to allow people to organise together for the public good.
We get to define what the public good is.
Disagreement with us is not in the public good
The purpose of the Equality Act 2010 is to support "our community".
The EHRC should not intervene to support other people's rights.