@whsource I’ve been saying this for many years, and it’s extremely clear on mechanistic considerations alone. Elevated glucose is only a problem in and of itself when it causes osmotic stress sufficient to induce a coma. That’s rare.
@whsource Dicarbonyls such as methylglyoxal are very strongly implicated in the causal pathway to diabetic complications, and insulin dramatically protects against them through causal pathways that are almost irrelevant to hyperglycemia.
@whsource Such that hyperglycemia should almost be regarded as an incidental correlate of insulin signaling deficiency, where it is the latter that causes diabetic complications.
@whsource And it’s not just via dicarbonyls. Insulin also is critical to antioxidant defense and the poor glutathione status and increased ROS that results from its deficiency are also major contributors.
@whsource Granted, elevated glucose can activate the polyol pathway which saps NADPH from glutathione recycling, but that’s only a secondary contributor to poor glutathione status, and it’s only relevant if hyperglycemia is mainly a supply-push phenomenon where intercellular levels go up.
@whsource If total body glucose is kept the same but hyperglycemia is mainly or purely an uptake problem, intracellular glucose wouldn’t even be elevated.
@whsource And what is glucose going to do in the blood besides be an osmolyte? Well, it can glycate hemoglobin, but we know that’s irrelevant because fructosamine 3-kinase mice have hugely elevated Hba1c but are totally healthy and live normal lifespans.
@whsource So this finding your posted is very cool, but seems very predictable in the lack of diabetic complications.
@whsource Notably, methylglyoxal is derived from both ketones and glucose, but it’s derivation from glucose is downstream from glucokinase, at the level of triose phosphate isomerase. So fuctokinase impairment should actually decrease methylglyoxal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I can see the argument that these only act from certain templates, but let’s not forget 1) we falsely believed this couldn’t be true & literally called it “the central dogma” for almost a century and 2) it’s commonly believed that some half of our genome was inserted by viruses.
Ok so Crick’s original stating of the dogma in 1957/58 applied the exclusion to protein—>nucleic acid but not to RNA—>DNA, whereas Watson’s 1965 formulation applied it to both, so Watson’s but not Crick’s version had been falsified by reverse transcription.
Some back-of-the-envelope math meant only as a thought experiment.
Deaths in 2020 were up 17.6% in 2020, and 68.5% of this was attributed to COVID.
If 25% of COVID deaths are falsely attributed, as in Alameda County, the COVID share drops to 51.4%.
51.4% obviously would have sufficient margin of error to say that half of the excess deaths were COVID, and half were non-COVID.
The non-COVID deaths are at least potentially attributable to lockdown. Supply chains cut off, lack of normal doctor's visits, and things like this compromised medical care.
@coldxman and @wil_da_beast630 I'm listening to your excellent interview and wanted to add something about the call-back studies.
The first thing is that the Bertrand and Mullainathan paper revealed some remarkable "name privilege" within each race. For example, "Brad" got 2.4x as many callbacks as "Neil" and "Kristen" got 64% more than "Emily."
They need faculty who aren’t totally ignorant of genetics to correct these students. “Race” might be a social construct, but “genetics” are not socially constructed, and this statement just highlights that Yale nursing students apparently are never taught a class on genetics.
This is basically the other side of what I was saying about censorship: surveillance. Big tech is becoming an arm of the state and the “antagonism” is an illusion. The government “going after” big tech just subjugates them further.
This is absolutely relevant to health, because health is their first and foremost target of both censorship and surveillance right now.
If you don’t think this will be applied to food, please read David Gumpert’s book Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Food Rights about the all-out assault on small farms and raw food coops that the Feds began in 2008: