The free and open internet is under attack by authoritarians all around the world.

How can liberal democracies defend the internet while creating a set of rules that mitigates harm?

New piece with @calebwatney @Maxjb & @andrewjb_ exploring this question:
innovationfrontier.org/defending-the-…
The Chinese Communist Party has blocked Western internet companies from accessing their domestic market for years.

Now, others are following in their footsteps.

Nigeria banned Twitter for deleting a tweet from the president.

India raided Twitter's office in New Delhi. Image
We can't return to the libertarian days of the early internet (nor would we want to).

But leaders need to defend and promote the values of the free and open internet, while taking targeted measures to address privacy concerns, hate speech, and foreign interference in elections. Image
If liberal democracies don't coordinate on regulation, then we will get one of two very bad outcomes:

1) The Chinese model will win out & we'll get a true splinternet

2) Liberal democracies just default to the most restrictive set of regulations (the "Brussels effect") Image
We need to act fast because the playbook of "shut down the internet during a crisis" is picking up steam.

And through the Belt and Road Initiative, China has been willing to invest in developing countries to a degree the West hasn't.

Why is there no US/UK competitor to Huawei? ImageImage
Here's a few places to start:

1. Invest $450 billion in closing the digital divide.

Prioritize investments in satellite broadband (Starlink, OneWeb, Viasat, and SES).

These are quasi-censorship resistant and easier to roll out globally than physical infrastructure. Image
2. Incentivize investment in servers and core infrastructure, including building out content delivery networks (CDNs) to increase internet consumption. Image
3. Make public investments in artificial intelligence R&D that shapes the competitive terrain to be compatible with liberal values.

For example, machine learning techniques like simulation learning and one-shot learning require less real world data — and fewer privacy concerns. Image
4. Double down on the Internet Society and create a more ambitious vision for the future of internet protocols.

We agree with @mmasnick: protocols > platforms Image
5. Lastly, we need new global frameworks for AI, content moderation and antitrust.

These should be developed in a multi-stakeholder process to build consensus and promote stability. Image
If we do these things, we have a chance at preserving the free and open internet. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alec Stapp

Alec Stapp Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlecStapp

18 Jun
Warning lights are starting to flash red for Intel in the chip market ImageImageImage
Our industrial champions are not looking great as of late... Image
FWIW the stock market seems to believe the new Intel CEO will be able to right the ship Image
Read 4 tweets
18 Jun
The number of new billion-dollar startups is collapsing in China at the same time it’s exploding in the US
I wonder if this is a factor fortune.com/2021/06/08/chi…
(Editor’s note: the x-axis is flipped for some reason, so read the chart from right to left.)
Read 4 tweets
1 Jun
Mandating “all-in” pricing would be a pro-consumer policy win.

Even well-meaning companies are forced to play games with adding on fees at the end of checkout because if they don’t they’ll lose market share to companies that do.

This is exactly what happened to StubHub.
Here’s what happened when StubHub tried to do “all-in” pricing on its own: ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
10 May
This debate is over, right?
Replies:

"Confirmed cases is an irrelevant statistic"

"It would be good to see actual death totals"

"Hospitalizations & deaths would be a better measure than limited testing"

"I don’t give a shit about covid cases. Not relevant statistic for the profound loss of civil rights"
The cumulative deaths chart really puts things in perspective.
Read 4 tweets
29 Apr
Content moderation at scale is a really hard problem
My previous work on content moderation, free speech, and digital platforms 👇
Read 4 tweets
24 Apr
Not The Onion:

“EU proposing to regulate the use of Bayesian estimation”
Can’t believe I missed the obvious “EU proposing to regulate use of obscure maths theorem” joke

h/t @mr_james_c
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(