To the folks tweeting at me about how despicable or cowardly it is for scientists to have sat on their doubts that the virus might’ve come from a lab:
1. You’re writing to the wrong person.
2. It’s normal to be afraid to wade into a politically toxic situation.
Which, sadly, I’ve found myself doing repeatedly throughout the last year trying to get people to take the lab leak hypothesis seriously…
I get that people are extremely mad that some experts didn't raise lab leak earlier. Whatever the reasons were: politics, workplace/peer pressure.
I've also had very low moments over the past year.
The 1st time I brought up lab leak, friends implied I was a conspiracy theorist.
I've spent 1+ year pushing back against the immediate reaction of lab leak=conspiracy - working on sci comm to explain that a lab leak is not only possible but plausible.
I've endured endless jibes about me seeking attention, being unqualified, spreading misinformation.
Here, please enjoy!
But, you know what, I didn't think it was possible, but those efforts paid off.
Eventually more and more scientists thought it's ok to publicly say I think Covid-19 could've been a lab leak. I'm going to get **** on by everyone in my life, but I can say it.
I entered a very dark place - ironic because I was talking to @undarkmag - I'd been targeted by Chinese state media and it honestly felt like no one was going to do anything to get a credible investigation into #OriginsOfCovid going.
Have you ever considered that there could be space in a given topic for two women *gasp* who are both asian *omg* who might even be sympathetic to each other's situations *mind explodes*
I guess I’ll wake up tomorrow and the previous president might’ve tweeted his own take on this unhinged game-of-telephone story…
Gotta say these folks are definitely showing scientists that we shouldn’t talk to the media.
“Chan said there had been trepidation among some scientists about publicly discussing the lab leak hypothesis for fear that their words could be misconstrued…”
Hi @thehill
I know that “Fear is the path to the dark side...”
Scientists afraid of their words being misconstrued and politicized are at least 2 steps away from hate.
Can you please fix your headline so it’s actually journalism?
The headlines keep getting worse. Some even describe me as denying lab leak - which as you know could not be further from the truth.
Can I ask you to write a new story with a headline that clarifies that some scientists spoke up about the lab leak early at great personal risk?
The negativity & anger directed at me on twitter is not awesome. And I am starting to worry about personal safety.
But the thing that frustrates me the most is that my institute, which has given me the academic freedom to work on this controversial topic, is now being targeted.
Please get this. A scientific institute that allows its scientists to work on controversial and challenging topics is now being accused and harassed by people who think it was squashing discourse.
Everyone, please help me to tag relevant journalists & public figures.
I hope the story will be set straight. That scientists who have been fighting for an investigation of lab leak aren't attacked by mistake due to accidental misreporting.
Thanks @Drinkwater5Reed
Hi @carolinedowney_@jimgeraghty@NRO
Can you please correct your recent piece? I did not wait for anyone or anything - I was already raising the possibility of a lab leak as publicly as I could in early 2020.
Thank you - for personal safety reasons!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On the #OriginsOfCovid I told @denisechow@NBCNews "I know a lot of people want to have a smoking gun. It's more like breadcrumbs everywhere, and they're not always leading in one direction. It's like the whole floor is covered in breadcrumbs." nbcnews.com/science/scienc…
I've recently been tagged in many threads with people arguing which is more likely: a natural or a lab origin of Covid-19.
This wasn't possible last year.
People (including scientists) arguing that a lab leak could be likely or even more likely were attacked as unscientific.
I think it's not very useful to speculate whether natural or lab origins are more likely. But. I think it's a good sign that the public and scientists are now able to talk about it without fearing excessive censure from their friends and colleagues.
@NatureNV I know it's very troubling that the one place a SARS-like pandemic-level pathogen emerges is the one place in China where there is a giant repository of SARS-like viruses collected from across China.
But it's irresponsible to play it down by saying "but China has coronaviruses!"
@NatureNV To study these SARS-like viruses with potential to spill into humans, the Wuhan lab had to send dozens of its personnel into remote caves and villages in South China to specifically mine for these viruses and bring 10,000s of animal and human samples ~1000 miles back to Wuhan.
For people who need a crash course in how the animal (zoonotic) origin of the first SARS virus was found, please read this short review written by Linfa Wang, Shi Zhengli, Peter Daszak and colleagues in 2006:
Note that they had not yet found the ancestral bat reservoir a long way away in Yunnan province (only published in 2017).
But it was clear SARS1-like viruses were circulating widely in the animal trading community (animals & humans) in Guangdong province where SARS broke out.
For SARS2, it’s the reverse.
When it broke out in Wuhan, we already knew where it’s ancestral reservoir was very likely to be. A virus genome matching 96% was already under study in a Wuhan lab. Collected from a mine after miners had sickened with a SARS-like pneumonia.
Also, to correct Stephen, Wuhan is not a place where SARS2-like viruses are known to circulate in bats or spillover into people.
The Wuhan institute of virology existed prior to 2003 SARS. A lab there pivoted to SARS research after the 2003 epidemic, and spent close to 2 decades ferrying 10,000s of potential SARS samples (animal and human) from more than 1000 miles away up into the Wuhan lab.
I want to impress that there is a lot to lose for scientists (esp virologists) to say they think Covid-19 could’ve emerged in connection to research activities.
All at once you’re dealing with your colleagues, institute, reviewers of papers & grants, & the Chinese government.
You’re literally acting against your self interest in every way possible except the interest of not having a future pandemic caused by a research-related accident.
I’ve spoken very highly of sleuths and data analysts who’ve worked on tracing the #OriginsOfCovid
But I also need to emphasize that the consequences for scientists are much worse. You could become a pariah overnight, accused of fanning the flames of conspiracy and AAPI hate.
Because so many experts are deleting their tweets now, people have had no choice but to look at archived pages to see what they said just over a year ago: