Ryan Goodman Profile picture
Jun 17, 2021 10 tweets 8 min read Read on X
<thread>

In @PostOpinions, former FBI General Counsel @AWeissmann_ and I assess FBI Director Wray's two days of testimony on #Jan6.

First, Wray failed to explain FBI policy on social media monitoring that may be "galling to lawmakers" when they find out.
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
2. Watch👇

@AOC: Does FBI monitor social media to combat violent extremism (such as threats to Capitol on social media pre-#Jan6)

Wray: DOJ policy prevents FBI without "proper predication"

DOJ policy: Can monitor social media WITHOUT predication for special events (like Jan 6)
3. Watch👇

@RepSwalwell: Does FBI have authority to monitor open source websites/social media where groups post about threats?

Wray: Att'y General Guidelines prevent FBI without "proper predication"

A.G. Guidelines: Can monitor WITHOUT predication for special events (eg #Jan6)
4. Here's a screenshot of those Attorney General Guidelines, which clearly state:

FBI Assessments are permitted for special events (obviously like certification of election at US Capitol).

Assessments authorize FBI scanning Internet for this content and, indeed, encourage it.
5. Note how closely Wray’s words in response to Swalwell (June 10) match Wray’s words in response to AOC (June 15).

Sounds like he carefully scripted his response in advance of the hearing.

Which would be extremely disappointing given how misleading the response is.
6. Wray vs. Wray

Watch👇

June 10: @RepSwalwell asks if social media company sent any tip to FBI warning of threat to Capitol.

Wray's response is VERY different when…

June 15: @RepMaloney reveals social media company Parler sent FBI tips of threats to Capitol. Wray admits it.
7. This by Wray is also galling

@RepCori questions how FBI action towards #Jan6 compare to FBI action towards #BLM in summer

Wray's response is basically: I came unprepared to recall what FBI did with BLM in summer

The question is foreseeable and hugely important to J6 inquiry
8. Wray must know answer to that specific Q.

Instead American public gets this:

“As far as the summer, sitting here right now, I know this is a hearing on Jan. 6, I just don't remember what products or intelligence assessments we did or didn't do over the course of the summer."
9. Wray is now part of the Garland @TheJusticeDept.

Wray's approach to Congress and to the public seems highly inconsistent with commitments #Garland made during his confirmation hearing. Commitments to transparency and responsiveness.

Memorable exchange with @SenWhitehouse👇
10/10. There's a lot more in @AWeissmann_ and my op-ed in the Washington Post.

I discussed several of these ideas today with @FrankFigliuzzi1 @BarbMcQuade @djrothkopf on @deepstateradio.

link to podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/nea…

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…

[End]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Goodman

Ryan Goodman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rgoodlaw

Aug 10
Many nuggets in these #Project2025 Secret Training Videos

One is the nexus to Trump world.

Karoline Leavitt - Trump Campaign's 2024 National Press Secretary - features in video training those who would occupy positions in a new Trump administration.

propublica.org/article/inside…
2/ Another is this remarkable statistic:

"A review of the training videos shows that 29 of the 36 speakers have worked for Trump in some capacity —on his 2016-17 transition team, in the administration or on his 2024 reelection campaign."

That's 81%.
3/ In #Project2025 secret video titled, "Hidden Meanings," former Trump administration official Bethany Kozma scorns U.S. intelligence agencies' warnings of #ClimateChange.

Says climate change is a conspiracy to limit population growth. 🤯

[Scoop by @AndyKroll @NickSurgey] Image
Read 6 tweets
Aug 8
What's in this image?⤵️

Color-coded indictment of former president Trump for trying to overturn 2020 election.

The vast majority - green, yellow, orange - is Trump’s conduct for which he is likely not immune, and district court will likely find he can be prosecuted for it.

1/Image
Image
2/ The color-coded January 6th indictment and accompanying analysis is in this @just_security article:

After Immunity: The Path Forward for the January 6th Case
By @NormEisen @Matt_Seligman @JoshuaGKolb

justsecurity.org/98457/immunity…
3/ New York Times' Jesse Wegman features the @just_security analysis in this essay:

The Trial Judge Who Has to Clean Up the Supreme Court’s Mess
nytimes.com/live/2024/08/0…
Read 5 tweets
Jul 30
Very rare to get behind-scenes look at SCOTUS deliberations⤵️

Makes clear - as @charlie_savage anticipated in his 2007 book - that CJ Roberts saw #PresidentialImmunity opinion as opportunity to create maximalist presidential powers. With no compromise
1/
cnn.com/2024/07/30/pol…
2/ @CNN exclusive reporting:

"There was an immediate and clear 6-3 split."

"In their private session on the case the next day...the votes on the core issue lacked any ambiguity and Roberts was ready to write with bold strokes."

cnn.com/2024/07/30/pol…
3/ This outcome has been in the making for nearly two decades. It's all about composition of the Court.

Charlie Savage's 2007 book: Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency and the Subversion of American Democracy

charliesavage.com/books/takeover…
Read 6 tweets
Jul 4
One of the most important legal conversations I've ever had.

We break down SCOTUS immunity decision.

Enormous implications for presidential power that many have not understood yet.

Mary McCord (@GeorgetownICAP)
@steve_vladeck
@marty_lederman
@pshah518

buzzsprout.com/2074610/153596…
2/ A premise of SCOTUS opinion is that POTUS has "conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority" over the Justice Department.

This should unsettle Americans, regardless of party.

Take a gander at what that means in Chief Justice Roberts' own words.⤵️ Image
3/ Potential effects for aggrandizement of power in executive branch.

Listen to @marty_lederman spell out potential implications for congressional legislation for DOJ (Roberts having sub rosa overruled/cast aside Morrison v. Olson, a 7-1 decision by Chief Justice Rehnquist).
Read 6 tweets
Jun 28
1/Don't believe the hype

The truth: Supreme Court ruling on #January6th obstruction charge materially affects at most only 5.9% of all Jan. 6th cases.

Some media get this wrong.

I teamed up with two greats—Mary McCord @AWeissmann_—to look at DOJ data⤵️
justsecurity.org/96493/supreme-…
2/ Put another way, 94% of the Capitol riot cases are clearly materially unaffected by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Fischer v. United States.

In this thread, I’ll explain more about what the data tell us.

Here's the key infographic.⤵️Image
3/ Many in media mistakenly focus on all defendants DOJ charged with obstruction.

The truth: A quarter of them pleaded guilty but NOT to obstruction. They pleaded to other charges.

Those charges and those sentences are utterly unaffected by Supreme Court’s ruling.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 24
This is important (but not close) debate.

@reidhoffman shows how @DavidSacks' defense of Trump policies is built on misconceptions and distortions of key facts.⤵️

Plus risk of "black swan" event via Trump policies could severely damage U.S. economy.

1/
reid.medium.com/a-reply-to-dav…
Image
2/ Report by Director of Economics at Yale's @The_Budget_Lab @ernietedeschi:

Analyzes the risk of a "‘black swan’ event outside of the realm of US experience, such as ... military intervention in domestic politics" with profound impact on US safe harbor investment premium.
Image
Image
@The_Budget_Lab @ernietedeschi 3/ "It is also reasonable to assume mass deportation of millions of migrants, the demolition of departments and agencies, and many other planned autocratic-leaning policies risk producing similar [black swan] results."

By @NormEisen @ruthbenghiat et al

justsecurity.org/92714/american…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(