Exposing the "science" and fighting back against mass human rights abuses has been the right thing to do.
For anyone who stumbles across this in 100 years, here's a summary of my work, and a conclusion:
π
August 2020:
I revealed that Neil Ferguson was a recipient of funds from the pharma industry and from the Gates Foundation, and that his calculation of Covid's fatality rate was utter junk.
His models and assumptions were nonsense from the beginning:
I figured out that the first five months of 2020 were less dangerous in Ireland than 2015, 2016 & 2018. Overall mortality appeared to be normal. And without any need for masks or vaccines!
With sarcasm, I expressed relief that corruption at the WHO was a thing of the past.
The British Medical Journal had previously found that industry-backed scientists were more likely than others to stoke fear over the fake swine flu pandemic.
I noted the frequency of side effects in relation to the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, and the lack of important information relating to long-term effects, fertility and transmission.
This tweet annoyed a lot of people but went truly viral:
With the final numbers for Swedish mortality in 2020, I found that Covid without a lockdown produced a better result than all years prior to 2014, and was little different compared to 2015-2018.
The tide has turned. Mainstream journalists can now criticise #NPHET without risking their careers.
If only they'd bothered to investigate Covid properly last year.
People like me would not have had to do it for them. The population might not have been so badly abused.
In time, I would like to see the politicians who voted for Covid-related human rights abuses to be prosecuted for crimes against humanity. This includes most currently sitting in the Irish and UK parliaments.
The momentum for #nuremberg2 will build, as more and more wake up.
However, that will not be my fight.
It was an intellectual challenge to debunk Covid. As far I'm concerned, it has now been successfully debunked.
I think it's time for me to go back to the intellectual challenges in my own profession.
Applying the CSO's method to prior years, there are several other occasions when "excess deaths" calculated in this way ran into four figures - without making any adjustments for the changing size and age of the Irish population.
βfor those with most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences. For those who have very short remaining life span.. benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant.β
As I initially suggested when I first read about the Pfizer vaccine, choosing between getting Covid and taking this vaccine might not be the obvious decision that so many people assume it to be:
As I said at the time, taking the vaccine doesn't necessarily mean you won't transmit the virus to someone else. This has been officially acknowledged:
BREAKING: I have the latest monthly death registrations from the Irish government's reporting office:
Let's do another quick thread to expose the scam. ππ
I'm now increasingly confident that there were just below 24,000 deaths in the first nine months of 2020 (based on the historic pattern of late registrations).
This is consistent with published death notices - there were 23,700 death notices.
So we get the following picture for total deaths each year.
The second chart is the same as the first, but it excludes the 1,800 "Covid-related deaths", i.e. it pretends they didn't happen.
Hmm. It's almost as if the first chart is more in line with the trend of prior years?