Listen, racists who use MLK's judge by the "content of their character," not "the color of their skin" to justify your racism: King wasn't talking about your children. He was talking about his children. He was saying that whites judge them by skin color and whites need to change.
The full line: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." Stop forgetting about that first part like it's the beginning of the 2nd Amendment.
That line is actually specifically about white privilege, that white kids get judged in a way that benefits them and non-white kids, again, specifically, his non-white kids get judged in a way that harms them.
The dream is that whites will evolve, not that non-whites will shut up about wanting equality and about wanting their history told truthfully. That's the dream of racists. Leave Martin Luther King out of your dreams.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I first heard about the Tulsa Race Massacre sitting at a table at the MLA conference in 1994. I don't remember his name, but I asked one of the people sitting with me what he was working on, and he said an article about the destruction of Greenwood. I asked what that was.
I felt sick to me stomach that I hadn't heard about it. I asked for details, and he told me the whole story. I told as many people as possible for a few years after because I felt so betrayed by my education (which at that point included graduate school).
The racist history of this country always shocks my students. I taught Branden Jacobs-Jenkins' play Appropriate this semester. It focuses around lynching photos. The students were confused and appalled because they hadn't heard about that.
Hmm. @nhannahjones has an MA and a Pulitzer and is a MacArthur Fellow. UNC hired as a Distinguished Professor Daniel Wallace, who is a best-selling author but only has a BA and most definitely isn't from a "traditional academic-type background," but he's white.
UNC also hired Alan Shapiro as a Distinguished Professor. He also only has a BA but is an award-winning poet. Still, not "traditional" blah, blah, blah, which generally means "PhD" or MFA. And, yeah, he's white.
In the UNC Journalism School, Chad Heartwood is an award-winning documentarian who only has an MA. And is white.
It's great that Liz Cheney is trying to drag the GOP into the realm of reality, but the Big Lie isn't just about Trump claiming he won. It's about states passing all kinds of laws to respond to non-existent fraud and irregularities.
It's all well and good to assert that Trump lost the 2020 election, but that's just part of the job. I don't know where Liz Cheney stands on the voter suppression laws in Georgia, Florida, etc. But she did vote against HR 1
Huh. My pal @Creterman just showed me that he has a DVD bootleg of Disney's Song of the South. So we're gonna watch it. We haven't seen it since we were kids. I wonder how it's aged. Let's see...
And away we go.
With cinematography by Gregg Toland, who also did Citizen Kane.
This has been bugging me for over a month: How the hell were they allowed to build a damn gallows in front of the Capitol? Like...you'd think someone would get out there and say, "Whoa, you're not allowed to do that."
And, I mean, this wasn't some little mockup or prop. It could support at least two people.
That means people were carrying in large pieces of solid wood. How was that allowed? Did they have a permit? Because I'm pretty sure that if I just started building a functioning gallows in Central Park, the cops would halt that pretty damn quickly.
JFC, I came across this Ross Douthat column from November 13, 2016. It's titled, no shit, "He Made America Feel Great Again," and it's a speculative piece about how wildly successful Trump's first term "was," pretending to look back from 2020, after his reelection. Holy fuck.
Where to begin? How about with: "Here we are four years later, watching Trump bask in the glow of an easy re-election over the Warren-Booker Democratic ticket." Oh, Ross, how simple you are.
Then it gets just absurd: "Trump’s Keynesianism was mostly defense spending and tax cuts, but it included a huge infrastructure push — soon nicknamed 'TrumpWorks' — that doubled as a jobs program." Infrastructure Week forever in Douthat-Land!