Please read from start to finish. Great article by @jamesbmeigs
“It would be tempting to cheer on a populist uprising against elite expertise and institutions. But.. majority of scientists, health-care institutions.. did vital heroic during the pandemic.”
commentarymagazine.com/articles/james…
As a scientist, I’m surrounded by scientists all the time so I often forget that most people do not have a scientist friend or family member in their lives.

You don’t get to see that scientists are people too, we get taken by surprise by pandemics, we have things we don’t know..
.. we have feelings.

Many of the scientists I know have been working to the point of burnout over the past year in response to the pandemic.

This is different from the actually very few (a handful of) scientists who bear some responsibility on the topic of the #OriginsOfCovid
If you talk to a scientist friend, they can go to town on all the problems we face in science today. There’s a lot wrong with academia & healthcare.

Despite all these problems, we still know that science is essential for society to function. That’s why many of us are scientists.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alina Chan

Alina Chan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ayjchan

20 Jun
Another miracle today. AFAIK this is the first @nytimes article to give the #OriginsOfCovid lab leak hypothesis fair consideration without the veneer of “but my expert friends said it was natural.”

nytimes.com/2021/06/20/wor…
Striking similarities between the 2 searches for the origin of an outbreak proximal to a lab likely working on similar (if not the same) infectious agent that caused the outbreak.

Hopefully we don’t need to wait decades to find the origin of Covid-19.
The most important takeaway from the story of the 1979 anthrax lab leak is that it did not involve a giant conspiracy - just the usual cover up you'd expect from an authoritarian state.

People, each with little bits of information, being silenced or too fearful to come forward.
Read 19 tweets
17 Jun
Getting angry tweets from Trump supporters since yesterday about a quote in @NBCNews @denisechow

Best to clarify before it escalates:

I publicly raised the lab leak hypothesis in Mar 2020 and have been pushing for an investigation for more than a year.

nbcnews.com/science/scienc…
To the folks tweeting at me about how despicable or cowardly it is for scientists to have sat on their doubts that the virus might’ve come from a lab:

1. You’re writing to the wrong person.

2. It’s normal to be afraid to wade into a politically toxic situation.
Which, sadly, I’ve found myself doing repeatedly throughout the last year trying to get people to take the lab leak hypothesis seriously…
Read 23 tweets
16 Jun
On the #OriginsOfCovid I told @denisechow @NBCNews "I know a lot of people want to have a smoking gun. It's more like breadcrumbs everywhere, and they're not always leading in one direction. It's like the whole floor is covered in breadcrumbs."
nbcnews.com/science/scienc…
I've recently been tagged in many threads with people arguing which is more likely: a natural or a lab origin of Covid-19.

This wasn't possible last year.

People (including scientists) arguing that a lab leak could be likely or even more likely were attacked as unscientific.
I think it's not very useful to speculate whether natural or lab origins are more likely. But. I think it's a good sign that the public and scientists are now able to talk about it without fearing excessive censure from their friends and colleagues.
Read 9 tweets
16 Jun
Please do better, @NatureNV

If your stance is to counter misinformation and focus on the science, the section pictured below needs to be majorly corrected.

By "broader region," did your journalists mean China or Asia? If so, you can see how this would lead to misunderstandings.
@NatureNV I know it's very troubling that the one place a SARS-like pandemic-level pathogen emerges is the one place in China where there is a giant repository of SARS-like viruses collected from across China.

But it's irresponsible to play it down by saying "but China has coronaviruses!"
@NatureNV To study these SARS-like viruses with potential to spill into humans, the Wuhan lab had to send dozens of its personnel into remote caves and villages in South China to specifically mine for these viruses and bring 10,000s of animal and human samples ~1000 miles back to Wuhan.
Read 4 tweets
16 Jun
For people who need a crash course in how the animal (zoonotic) origin of the first SARS virus was found, please read this short review written by Linfa Wang, Shi Zhengli, Peter Daszak and colleagues in 2006:

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12…
Note that they had not yet found the ancestral bat reservoir a long way away in Yunnan province (only published in 2017).

But it was clear SARS1-like viruses were circulating widely in the animal trading community (animals & humans) in Guangdong province where SARS broke out.
For SARS2, it’s the reverse.
When it broke out in Wuhan, we already knew where it’s ancestral reservoir was very likely to be. A virus genome matching 96% was already under study in a Wuhan lab. Collected from a mine after miners had sickened with a SARS-like pneumonia.
Read 8 tweets
15 Jun
Must watch. ⁦@jonstewart⁩ and ⁦@StephenAtHome⁩ discuss the lab leak hypothesis on ⁦@colbertlateshow

Also, to correct Stephen, Wuhan is not a place where SARS2-like viruses are known to circulate in bats or spillover into people.
The Wuhan institute of virology existed prior to 2003 SARS. A lab there pivoted to SARS research after the 2003 epidemic, and spent close to 2 decades ferrying 10,000s of potential SARS samples (animal and human) from more than 1000 miles away up into the Wuhan lab.
During the course of these virus hunting expeditions, the lab even used the Wuhan human population as a negative (no SARS virus) control.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(