@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch According to the @BLS_gov, "[o]n the days they worked, employed men worked 49 minutes more than employed women. … However, even among full-time workers (those usually working 35 hours or more per week), men worked more per day than women—8.4 hours, compared with 7.9 hours."
@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch American Time Use Survey (with 2017 as an example) shows that women on average are not spending enough more time with their kids, doing chores, or anything else to explain women's lack of time working.
On average, men just work more in America (considering both paid and unpaid).
Women care for and help household members 2.08 more hours per day than men in the most extreme case presented by Table 8A, but men work 6.43 hours more per day than women.
@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch Similarly, comparing the men from Table 8B to the women from Table 8C (where the youngest child is under 6), women do household activities for 1.91 more hours per day than men in the most extreme case presented by Table 8A, but, again, men work 6.43 hours more per day than women.
@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch Let's do the math: Men: Women:
Household activities: 1.26 3.17
Caring for household: 1.42 3.36
Work-related activities: 6.57 0.00
==========
Total: 9.25 6.53
Who is doing more?
@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch By comparing the men from Table 8B to the women from Table 8C (using the youngest child under 6 column), we see the situation where women are unemployed and spending the most time caring not only for the children but the whole family.
@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch If women with kids are working fewer paid work hours due to the number of hours spent on childcare responsibilities, we should've seen women performing as many domestic labor hours as men were spending doing paid labor, but that isn't what we see.
@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch Maybe women are forced to stay home with their kids and that causes the gap. If true, women with no kids should be working the same amount as men in the workforce as there is no reason not to since there is no reason to be on call and no extra household or child care duties.
@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch Whether you consider all currently childless folks (Table 8A) or just the ones working (Table 8B), women spend less time on paid labor and related activities and women spend less time working considering both unpaid domestic labor and paid labor added together. The pattern holds.
@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch "Women spent most of their day in sedentary (~55%) and light (~32%) activity, with limited lifestyle (~11%) and moderate vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (~2%), and there were no differences between the homemakers and [employed women]" (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…).
@LavAgarwal95@General_Oluchi@BLS_gov@pewresearch "Based on self-report, previous studies suggest that homemakers obtain less total physical activity, have lower overall activity-related energy expenditure, and are less likely to participate in vigorous leisure-time physical activity, than [employed women]" (Id.).
@Oneiorosgrip@SignHexa Regarding historical parental fiscal responsibility, consider "Lagging Behind the Times: Parenthood, Custody, and Gender Bias in the Family Court" by Cynthia McNeely published in 1998 in Volume 25 of the _Florida State University Law Review_ page 891 (ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewconten…).
@Oneiorosgrip@SignHexa "[T]he father [was designated] as the natural protector of children because he had the ability to provide for their financial support. Women were seen as incapable of handling legal or financial matters…." 25 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 891, 897 (1998).
@Oneiorosgrip@SignHexa "Because fathers usually provided the family’s sole income through their employment away from the home [during the Industrial Revolution], this absence advanced the fathers' 'long march from the center to the periphery of domestic life.'" 25 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. at 898 (1998).
@eminently_me5@Eminently_Me Where? You have only demonstrated that you have poor reading comprehension. First, you claim the study says that the "vast majority of perps are men and the victims are majority women" (archive.ph/XDGxP), but the study shows the opposite (
@eminently_me5@Eminently_Me You then claim that there "some subsets in which it is equal" but that "in the total set, it is primarily men attacking women" (archive.ph/3Jplg), but the study shows the opposite (
) as indicated in this chart showing all the data analyzed.
@eminently_me5@Eminently_Me However, the study does show that a lot of women rape women in institutions like prison and jail (both in adult and juvenile populations), which it appears that you are trying to blame on men somehow. 🤣 Your demonstrable lack of reading comprehension is laughable.
@eminently_me5 There are academic studies that don't support your contention, @eminently_me5, that women are only or primarily defensively abusing men (archive.ph/VqwkS), but rather suggest that women abuse men more often than men abuse women.
Let's look at some more studies, shall we?
@eminently_me5 With physical aggression, "studies consistently find that as many women self-report perpetrating this behavior as do men; some studies find a higher prevalence of physical aggression committed by women" (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…, p. 2), but only a minority of women are arrested.
@eminently_me5 Notes @TheJusticeDept: "[w]ife defendants had a lower conviction rate than husband defendants…. Of the 222 wife defendants, 70% were convicted of killing their mate. By contrast, of the 318 husband defendants, 87% were convicted of spouse murder" (bjs.gov/content/pub/pd…, p. 2).
@eminently_me5@Firebird_psych@Oneiorosgrip@DavidsonYorick Probably many of those “rapes” weren’t rape. DNA evidence suggests that between a fifth and a quarter of rapes women report are either completely false or misidentify the rapist. There isn’t statistically significant data regarding false rape allegations from male victims.
@eminently_me5@Firebird_psych@Oneiorosgrip@DavidsonYorick It is worth noting that, of the rape allegations that are reported and where DNA testing has been performed, apparently "the current 'exclusion' rate [of rape suspects] for forensic DNA labs [is] close to 25 percent" according to Rockne Harmon (ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/dnaev…).
@eminently_me5@Firebird_psych@Oneiorosgrip@DavidsonYorick "Every year since 1989, in about 25 percent of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI where results could be obtained…, the primary suspect has been excluded by forensic DNA testing" according to Peter Neufeld, Esq., and Barry C. Scheck (ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/dnaev…).