Good news for Greeks and Cypriots perhaps - the CB will not close off access to CBDC in a financial crisis, like banks closed off access to the people’s money in the Greek and Cypriot crises.
Apparently, yes, the ECB is going to set itself up in the risk competition as the risk-free money provider.
Apparently, no, as the ECB is going to appoint commercial banks (and others) as service providers. Including of AML/KYC which is open permission to do anything.
The fix is in? No more talk of financial inclusion?
Panetta is on more solid ground calling so-called “stable coins” unstable coins.
But loses it on the common criminality charge: "we know from recent experience that those crypto-assets are largely used for criminal activities” which the data denies.
Then, Monetary Policy:
There it is, folks. Save that tweet! Bc the future might be very different 🙂
Meanwhile, Panetta leans heavily on €3000 cap. Which is high for some, low for others, including various financial inclusion scenarios.
This is the trap - close it too much, risk failure.
Finally, a tantalising comment about cross-border international payments.
Nice in theory, but we know that we cannot transact onside borders without the foreigners getting access to our data. Nice try, but no thanks.
Privacy is #1
additional article:
Digital euro will protect consumer privacy, ECB executive pledges
Thread on middle names. As we discovered at CAcert, there is now one form of names., and attempts to regularise it into one clean system are doomed to be unclean.
Some random things about names. It’s possible to have two first names, or a name with two names in it.
In Spain, everyone has two surnames, one from either side. Also in Spain, up until recent times, first names were religious, and all women were named Maria of something.
For example, Maria de La Mar or Maria del Sol, which shortens to Marisol. So not only multiple words but multiple forms.
In Greece, when your name is written on legal documents, it includes your parentage, sometimes only your father, other times both.
Everyone’s writing about Tether at the moment, so why not join in the noise.
They announced that about half of their reserves are held in commercial paper, which is a short term loan to some company, good for the money, on some future date. So far so good. 1/12
The rosy picture: a buyer of Tether turns up with $$$, and purchases in good faith the same amount of USDT. The system then places that $$$ into its reserves. The $$$ are then lent to a company in exchange for commercial paper. Which is paid back in due course with $$$. 2/12
While good accounting, I see 3 potential flaws. (1) Will the company pay back? Of course, some might not. Let’s say 2% do not- this is covered as Tether actually sports more reserves than issued units of USDT, and the commercial paper pays a competitive rate of interest. 3/12
ORF (media) in Austria report that 5 eyes Intelligence Community have convinced EU Council to secretly resolve for a total EU backdoor on end-to-end encryption.
As a term, PKI suffers the same problem as ‘identity’ - it means different things to different people. Consequently, as a sector, it’s totally unreliable as a term. It can mean...
Infrastructure around PKs to make the PK do or mean something. OR
Identity system based on PKI, implying use of private key is proof of person. Or...
@Steve_Lockstep@joerosato@csuwildcat X.509-based PKI which locks in a particular technology *and* a set of meanings/doings which don’t work *and* a set of companies that extract rents for little benefit, which extraction works a treat.
So, 1st order question is, what is this person meaning when using the term PKI?
Here is the response if the website strategic hyphen culture dot org is included in the Tweet:
Here’s the part I wanted to highlight, which is important!
💥 "The prize that America truly seeks is to seize for itself over the coming decades, all global standards in leading-edge technology, and to deny them to China.” 👈 👆
As we move closer to November, it’s somewhat non-controversial to say this USA election is the most divisive in living memory. I at least can’t recall one as divisive. 1/34
Reasons are obvious but I want to point out one reason that isn’t obvious, it’s the “NEVER TALK ABOUT…” rule.