In @PunchbowlNews this AM: ☀️Inside the W.H.’s infrastructure strategy
This is a massive week for President Joe Biden’s quest to cut a bipartisan infrastructure deal. And we expect the president to lean in and try to move the process along.
@PunchbowlNews Here’s news we have after relentlessly bugging people on Father’s Day (sorry!):
→ 1st: Tthe WH truly seems to believe a deal with the bipartisan group of 20 senators is doable and perhaps even likely. We can’t tell how much of this is sunny optimism and how much is reality
@PunchbowlNews → The White House’s main focus this week is to try to figure out the right mix of offsets so the bipartisan group of senators will back off its insistence on hiking the gas tax and instituting a tax on miles driven by electric vehicles.
These fees seem to be red lines for the administration, and the White House has made suggestions to the group on different ways to drop these provisions while continuing to pay for the entire package.
@PunchbowlNews → We got the sense yesterday that there will be a White House meeting with senators this week.
@PunchbowlNews On the House side, the Democrats will begin preparing to meld a $574 billion surface transportation bill coming out of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee with some water-related legislation from the Energy and Commerce Committee.
@PunchbowlNews This will head to the floor next week, delivering on @SpeakerPelosi’s promise to pass an infrastructure package by the July 4th recess.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why Biden shouldn’t take the deal, as we laid out in @PunchbowlNews this AM:
→ 1 tough vote. If Congress jams everything from Biden’s American Jobs and Families plans into one massive, multi-trillion dollar reconciliation package, then lawmakers only have to take one vote.
@PunchbowlNews → Don’t be cute. In order to pass a bipartisan infrastructure bill, Biden will have to corral Ds to simultaneously support a separate reconciliation package filled with more controversial spending provisions for social programs. Don’t you realize how hard that’s going to be?
@PunchbowlNews → Progressives see a trap -- and they might be right. Say this roughly $1 trillion package passes with Sinema and @Sen_JoeManchin backing it -- or even leading the way, as Sinema is doing. Will they vote for a package that includes big social program spending? Or tax increases?
In @PunchbowlNews this AM, we laid out five reasons why @JoeBiden should take this infrastructure deal, and why he shouldn’t — based on reporting from the Capitol and the White House.
@PunchbowlNews@JoeBiden → Biden should take it because he has a lot of stuff to get done. And the most efficient and best way to get the most stuff done is to get some stuff done all the time, so you have less stuff to do.
Make sense? There’s a deal on the table, or at least the outlines for a deal.
@PunchbowlNews@JoeBiden → Scratching an itch is fun. Biden wants a bipartisan W worse than we want the cicadas to bury themselves for the next 17 yrs. And guess what, Mr. President: This is your chance. Not many more after this
In @PunchbowlNews this AM, we ran down all of the options Pelosi has on the Jan. 6 commission — and the plusses and minuses in each approach.
This is based off of deep reporting in the House Dem Caucus.
Here … we …. go:
@PunchbowlNews The House can push for another Senate vote. good luck. Senate hates listening to the House. and the Rs have made it clear.
There is talk, though, of amending the House bill with the @SenatorCollins changes and sending it back to the Senate. That may be interesting, but 🤷♂️
@PunchbowlNews@SenatorCollins Select committee. this is the play that a lot of people want. Pelosi gets to choose who sits on the panel. Lot of control for the speaker here. and would Rs appoint members? Assume so.