You know what would be cool? Normalize just saying "queer" whenever you're broadly referring to queer people. It's a single syllable, it covers everyone, and it shuts down several different disinformation campaigns/bigoted dog whistles.

It's also less confusing all around.
LGBTQIA+ already has a lot of redundancy to it. Written out longform that's Lesbian, Gay (and honestly it's a little weird we have two different terms for roughly-exclusively same-gender attracted especially when only the one is really functonally gendered), Bi/Pan (into multiple
genders), Transgender (pretty straightforward), Queer (a really good catch-all that covers literally anything any of these other letters do plus a lot of other things, some of which don't really have specific terms established), Intersex (again, pretty basic), Asexual/Aromantic
(for people not into anyone), and Plus which... literally serves the same purpose as having Queer in there, covering anything that was left out.

And then you have a bunch of variatons on this. Still pretty common to see it cut down to LGBTQ+ or LGBT+ or just LGBT and it can seem
like people are thus listing stuff in descending order of importance/realness. Particularly when bigots keep giving the game away and making it real clear that's precisely why they're shortening it (aside from obvious stuff like the fascist hate group "LGB Alliance" I just saw
someone really suspiciously and repeatedly saying LGBTQI+which is not one of the standards and is sawing off a group that faces a whole lot of bigotry from other queer people).

And then you also have various efforts to extend it out even more like QUILTBAG (which is at least
easier to say out lout than a string of letters, but "queer" is still just 1 syllable/5 characters), like LGBTQQIP2SAA or LGBTIQCAPGNGFNBA and we see here the obvious problem that those are just not usable, and also the less obvious problem that all these efforts to cover all the
bases still leave some bases out. And that's not even getting into people trying to slip "A is for Ally" in there, and you know, while allies are great, if you think meeting the baseline of human decency somehow makes you oppressed or gives you the right to speak over people in
queer spaces, you definitely aren't one.

So again, unless you're focused on a particular sort of person, or a specific individual, in which case you should always use the actual term(s) relevant to the matter at hand, just say queer. It's the easiest thing to say, and type, and
it covers everyone.

And to address the predictable comment I am seeing from a lot of people at once, let me again reiterate that normalizing queer as your go-to default undermines a lot of anti-queer propaganda crap.

Which aside from all the stuff dropping and adding letters
includes the big astroturf campaign bigots have been running for some time now to convince people that queer is a slur, which it most emphatically is not.

It WAS used as a slur back in the 1800s, however:
A- There was a big ol' giant push to successfully reclaim it decades ago.
B- Literally every other term that has ever been used to describe anyone under the queer umbrella has ALSO historically been used as a slur, and has been popularly used as such far more recently, if it ever fell out of favor (pretty sure kids are still calling anything they don't
like "gay" and I've never seen anyone suggest we stop using that one).
C- As I already laid out, it's the ONLY label that covers a huge chunk of people under the umbrella here.

Like if we all arbitrarily decided we don't like the word lesbian (and a lot of people actually HAVE
because they feel it's been too tainted by fascists using it as a euphemism for being a fascist), you've still got gay woman, sapphic, WLW, queer, dyke, and if you've ever thought even one non-binary person or man is hot, bi.

But if, just to pull a couple examples off the top of
my head, you are only attracted to nonbinary people, you've worked out that you aren't straight but you haven't quite worked out whether you're ace or demi or gay or maybe actually straight just repulsed by everyone who's ever shown interest in you on a personal level, or you're
similarly uncomfortable with the gender you were assigned but don't feel like you should necessarily lower that flag and raise another or you don't want to have to explain in specific detail to some strangers why it is that a bunch of fascist pieces of garbage want to exterminate
you but do want to let them know that's something you're dealing with, queer is the only term in the bundle you can apply to yourself without any stress and I care way more that you still have that than whether it reminds someone of a bullying incident they suffered half a decade
ago.

I mean, "We're here! We're queer! Get used to it!" has kind of been THE #1 marching slogan for 32 years. There's no real excuse not to have gotten around to the bit where you get used to it by now.
Also everyone DID catch that I said I'd like people to default to queer instead of LGBTQIA+ and variations thereof, yes? Because I'm seeing a lot of people going "well what if one specific individual doesn't like to be called queer?"

I mean, yeah, obviously don't call that one
specific person queer then, but how is that at all relevant to the topic at hand? I WISH I could say "nobody refers to a single individual person as LGBTQIA+ after all" but... news articles actually do that all the time. It's just pure gibberish. ANOTHER reason to depreciate it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Secret Gamer Girl

Secret Gamer Girl Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SecretGamerGrrl

25 Jun
So today's quick glance at my feed shows that a whole hell of a lot of people just within the past day or two had their first encounter with a bigot referring to herself as a "trans widow."

"Widow" means "woman whose spouse has died," so "trans widow" thus means "trans woman
whose spouse has died" and there is absolutely no circumstance, not even when when talking about bigots creative language choices, where it is ever remotely OK to use that phrase to mean anything other than that, and absolutely fuck anyone who ever does so, you horrible monsters.
Obviously, when bigots appropriate the term, they use it to mean something completely different, but now that you've read the above let's proceed just saying The Term, shall we?

Anyway bigots use The Term to describe hypothetical cis women who somehow manage to marry trans women
Read 29 tweets
23 Jun
I really don't want to jump to conclusions but I'm pretty darn sure an increasing amount of the feedback this thread is getting today is coming from the teens that undercover fascists have been spreading the lie that queer is a slur to.

And I have to keep reminding myself I do
have enough followers that I'm going to see the statistical outliers leaving comments, but for real kids. I am like twice your age, and the usage of "queer" as a slur was already basically extinct before I was born, and never had any magical extra hateful connotation that isn't
still present when people use "gay" derisively.

The only reason to find one more offensive than the other is if you consider being any of the other various identities under the umbrella to be objectively worse things than being gay, and it is, in fact, not OK to think that.
Read 7 tweets
10 Jun
Here's a subject I haven't really gotten directly sermonizing about for a bit, in large part because of the chilling effect of what I'm going to lay out in the rest of this thread.

For a good long while, one of the most popular public faces of the modern fascist movement was a
creep whose name I'd prefer not to directly invoke, both because I know it's still a trauma trigger, and because he changed his name to a long one from a culture he does not actually have roots in with the intent of encouraging people to normalize racist parodies of it. Wrote for
Breitbart, bunch of scandals, you probably remember him.

And you may also remember, or maybe not, that the moment the tide turned on him and his ability to get anyone to pay him any attention started to plummet when, in doing a background check because he was slated to speak at
Read 26 tweets
25 Apr
I'm still not in a place where I feel safe looking at this here website, which means I've been doing a lot more binging of youtube stuff to keep me distracted, and somewhere in doing that my better judgement lost out and I watched this here "Mask Off" video from Lindsay Ellis and
A- This felt like seriously cheating on my big break from looking at this awful website.

B- This is a very bad video that she really should not have produced and uploaded and I'm a bit compelled now to get into it, again, against my better judgement.

Apologies if I'm preaching
to the choir, and also I cannot stress enough that I am not trying to open a dialog/start crap/anything else like that here.

I would advise against watching the video for context because, again, it is very bad, and no good can come of that, and it's worth noting that I have no
Read 35 tweets
15 Mar
So my whole thread today has been people talking about how monstrously transphobic Linehan and Singal are, and I would kind of appreciate it if people stopped that.

When you name someone's prejudice in that way, you're making the central issue one of motivation. Did this jerk do
this thing for a bigoted reason, or for some other reason? And it's generally implied with the framing that if they did not do the thing for bigoted reasons, it is OK that they did the thing.

So you know, when someone fires someone for coming out as trans? Yeah, it's important
there to prove that they were motivated by bigotry, because that's a pretty horrific reason to take someone's job away, and there generally isn't a consequence to firing someone normally because the rest of the standard reasons are like, they were bad at their job and such.
Read 15 tweets
6 Mar
You know what, let's sit here a moment and talk about the harassment I receive on a daily basis as a trans woman. This isn't about broad trends, this is focused on me, and I want everyone who sees it to retweet this whole thread far and wide.

I have a policy to never post or let
others post photographs or videos of me on the internet. This is a policy I have in place because since mid-2014, I have had neo-nazis constantly plotting to murder me, and not knowing what I actually look like, or where I live, makes for a pretty sizable barrier to their efforts
Being frustrated by this, and the various other ways that I really am entirely too boring to make for an engaging stalking target, several of these nazis set up a website they make up all kinds of ridiculous nonsense about me, and fill it with "photos they've collected" which are
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(