In case you thought conservatives were done with the "death panel" smear, here's the Wall Street Journal editorial page this morning. (1) wsj.com/articles/the-a…
The subject of the editorial is the outrage over a new Alzheimer's drug that will cost $56,000 with scant evidence of benefit.
Editorial sneers about "experts" making that case. Also takes a swipe at Sen. Ron Wyden, who has spoken out against the drug. (2)
Wyden has spent his career as an advocate for seniors & their health care, going back to 1970s when he was with Oregon's chapter of the Gray Panthers.
Also his mother had Alzheimer's, a fact he's cited repeatedly when making the case to help patients & their families. (3)
Just to be clear, many of the experts objecting treat Alzheimer's patients and quite a few of them (like Wyden) have loved ones who suffer/suffered with it.
They are angry because they don't believe the drug works, given evidence from the trials. (4)
Among the many worries: By approving this drug and then paying the $56,000 that Biogen wants from it, the federal government could actually steer future research away from more promising treatments. (5)
The cost could make it harder to finance programs for services like home care, which Alzheimer's patients, families need desperately.
Biden infrastructure package would spend $400B on home care. Guess who's opposed?
More on the Alzheimer's drug here, in an article that I certainly hope is more nuanced and rooted in fact than what the @WSJopinion published. (7) huffpost.com/entry/fda-aduh…
Reminder: The @WSJ news staff is top notch, some of the best journalists out there. Especially on health care! They have nothing to do with the opinion page. (8)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@JHWeissmann ...although I really think it depends on the issue. With a lot of these, you can dial it down, one way or another, and still get serious benefits.
@JHWeissmann And then you build on later. Make paid leave longer, expand child care to more kids or make it more generous, add dental now and visual later, etc.
Per this chart I made this week, of Senate seats that changed parties 2009 to 2021, Dems had more than a dozen in R-states. Survival strategy for most was to create distance from party & liberal-sounding policies. (2) citizencohn.substack.com/p/one-reason-2…
Here's what Phil Schiliro, who was director of legislative strategy at the White House under Obama, told me for @HuffPost article on this. (Similar quotes in my book on the ACA.)
Latest from @adamcancryn on the internal Biden administration debate over an FDA commissioner, and concerns that Janet Woodcock is too close/sympathetic to pharmaceutical industry.
In 2009, when E&C Committee was writing its version of what became the the Affordable Care Act, Eshoo pushed to give biologics a longer "exclusivity" period.
Chairman Henry Waxman, who thought it was a giveaway to industry, opposed that strongly. Eshoo prevailed. (2)
As legislation moved through Congress, Waxman kept fighting to reduce that period. So did Obama, who agreed w/Waxman and was really worked up about it.