Our policy differences result from different views of “competitive sport”
Ross see it to “reward performance excellence” based on “physiology”
Well, yes
This is true like the stock market exists to “reward business excellence” based on “economics”
But there’s a lot more going on
Competitive sport actually has a history
And we can look at history to see justifications provided when it was created
And it turns out, it’s a pretty complicated & sordid history, reflective of the broader society of which sport is a part
That’s right - Sport is part of society
It’s important to understand that everything - absolutely everything - abt sport is a human invention
5000m? Why not 6000? 3741.2?
11 a side in soccer? Why not 10? 34?
You get the point
We make up all rules governing sport
Sport is a social construction from start to finish
One of the key rules in sport is who gets to participate & where
The processes and jurisprudence for the application of such rules is complicated (eg, the Canadian boxer denier a spot in Tokyo because she took time off to have a kid)
And these rules changed & evolve, as rules do
If you want to see classification decision-making in even more complexity, look at the Paralympics
Here is classification difficult, messy, contested, political?
You bet
Do the Paralympics work?
You bet
Are there constant trade-offs among inclusion, fairness, safety?
You bet
So @Scienceofsport concludes trans athletes should be banned from mainstream sport bc we can’t simultaneously optimize inclusion, fairness, safety doesn’t really make sense historically or logically
Of course we can’t maximize all values at once
Hence politics, in sport & society
For my part
Sport is a part of society and thus must reflect that society
It is not a special carve out where discrimination & exclusion get to run free (though that indeed is a part of its history)
If society accepts trans individuals in mainstream activities, sport must follow
How to achieve inclusion, balancing fairness and safety?
Sport is up for it
If it can pull off the Paralympics it can certainly handle classification challenges of trans athletes
But if not, I know some smart people who can help them out!
Will inclusion make some people uncomfortable?
Will it challenge preconceptions and bespoke definitions of the “purpose of sport”?
Yes and yes
In this way sport is no different than any other area where values collide - it can be messy
Get used to it
Finally
The issue of trans athletes in sport is really about what kind of world we want to live in
For me, I want to live in a world where human diversity in all of its forms is treated with dignity
And that means inclusion, even when it is challenging
😎👍
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵One of the most remarkable aspects of science advice in the COVID-19 pandemic was how utterly unprepared the US government was ... I look back at how this happened from Bush to Obama to Trump in this post ... here is a short thread as well ...
The US government paid little attention to pandemic planning before Pres GHW Bush, who read a book on summer vacation in 2005 that sparked his interest
In fact, during his presidency in his public remarks Ronald Reagan only mentioned the word "pandemic" 1 time and GHWB not at all. Climate mentioned "pandemic" 16x, then GWB at 214
I was curious
So I graphed percent of CONUS in drought according to the US drought monitor, data is weekly from 1/2000 droughtmonitor.unl.edu/CurrentMap.aspx