Important analysis of the ongoing AZ review of ballots, from two real election experts, @KYTrey and @bcburden:

"Because it lacks the essential elements of a bona fide post-election analysis, the review will not produce findings that should be trusted."

statesuniteddemocracy.org/resources/repo…
"The ongoing review of ballots from the November 2020 general election in Maricopa County as ordered by the Arizona State Senate and executed by their inexperienced, unqualified contractor, Cyber Ninjas, does not meet the standards of a proper election
recount or audit." /2
"The Cyber Ninjas review suffers from uncompetitive contracting, a lack of impartiality and partisan balance, a faulty ballot review process, inconsistency in procedures, an unacceptably high level of error built into the process, and insufficient security." /3
"A general lack of transparency and communication
also makes it difficult to evaluate the review fully as one would an official recount or audit, and it undermines rather than establishes confidence in the election system and the review itself." /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Becker

David Becker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @beckerdavidj

27 Apr
The ongoing mess that is the AZ “election audit,” lacking any sense of transparency, conducted by an inexperienced, biased out-of-state firm, contaminating chain-of-custody and the ballots themselves, is not only a bad idea. It also likely violates federal law. /1
52 USC 20701 requires that election officials, and ONLY election officials, preserve all fed’l election records, including ballots, for at least 22 months after an election. This is to preserve evidence in case of a violation of voting laws. /2

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52…
@USDOJ’s Public Integrity unit has a manual on the Prosecution of Election Offenses. That manual is very clear about the responsibility to maintain the provenance of ballots and other fed’l election materials, and the penalties for failure to do so. /3

justice.gov/criminal/file/…
Read 11 tweets
26 Apr
FL SB90 just passed the Senate on nearly a pure party-line vote (23-17, with only 1 R voting "no"). This completely unnecessary bill fails to recognize the exceptional election FL just held, accessible to all with maximum integrity - a model for the nation. /1
Two provisions of particular concern.

Like GA, this bill outlaws giving "any item to a voter" waiting in line. Not water, not a sandwich, not a pen, not a book, not an umbrella. What this provision is fixing, and how it will be enforced, remains a total mystery. /2
SB 90 also severely limits drop boxes, which now can only be open during early voting hours, and must be staffed during that time. Voters who wish to return a mail ballot without relying on the USPS and work late, well, they're out of luck. /3
Read 5 tweets
26 Apr
Read this. "Critics in both parties charge that what began as a way to placate angry Trump voters has become a political embarrassment and another blow to the once-inviolable democratic norm that losers and winners alike honor results of elections." /1

nytimes.com/2021/04/25/us/…
"Hoping to head off a dispute, the supervisors hired two federally approved firms to conduct a forensic audit of the county’s voting machines. The audit concluded that the equipment had performed flawlessly." /2
The R senate leader stated “A lot of our constituents have questions about the validity of it. What else could we do to verify the votes were accurate.” She could start by telling the truth, and telling those voters that multiple audits confirmed the election was accurate. /3
Read 6 tweets
15 Apr
In our report released Monday, below, @ElectionInnov found that 35 states plus DC offer no-excuse mail or early in-person voting. Only 15 states don't offer both a mail and early in-person option for all voters. /1

electioninnovation.org/research/early…
It's important to note that all this report measured was whether states offered both mail and early voting to all voters. It did not measure other access and integrity issues, such as restrictive ID, availability of drop boxes, or auditable paper ballots. /2
We also did not assess which states among those that offered early and mail options to all voters were more accessible than others, or whether recent laws moved those states in a direction of better access and integrity, or worse. /3
Read 5 tweets
1 Apr
We're understandably focused on bills/laws being proposed/passed to restrict voting and which hurt election integrity in several states, but we should be paying particular attention to what is happening in TX, right now. /1
In a late night vote, the TX senate just passed SB7, which puts significant restrictions on voting, in a state where it's already harder to vote than almost anywhere else. /2

TX SB7 prohibits efforts by election officials to encourage or educate voters about early and mail voting options. It even requires those who need to vote by mail due to disability to provide a gov't document or a doctor's attestation that they are "disabled." /3
Read 18 tweets
2 Jan
It's now clear that no amount of debasement of American democracy will satisfy some members of the Republican party. As they attempt a coup against American voters, while they cloak themselves with statements they won't make in court, they also debase themselves. /1
These members' of the GOP efforts to cloak themselves in the language of democracy, while actively working to subvert it, will fail. Joe Biden will be inaugurated on Jan. 20, as the voters have determined, and nothing can or should stop that. /2
In 2016, not one member of the Senate stood to object to a single state's electoral votes, confirming the election of Trump. Even though 2016 was a very close election - much closer than 2020 - the values of democracy were upheld by both parties. /3
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(