A lot of media outlets are bending over backwards to avoid saying that @SenWhitehouse’s decades-long membership in and familial part-ownership (!) of an all-white beach club is racist.
Take a look at the mental gymnastics involved so far ⤵️
I want to start with @nytimes because the way they’ve handled it is emblematic of coverage broadly for two reasons:
1. They’ve mostly ignored it - so far, just a brief mention in their daily roundup 2. They’ve omitted the actual criticism from the title (“exclusive” not racist)
This “exclusive” (vs. problematic) framing is everywhere.
At a time when race/racism has dominated US media coverage, having a (Democratic) Senator as a member/his wife as a part-owner apparently makes it simply an “elite private club” instead of an all-white one to @CBSNews.
But the award for most bizarre framing has to go to @Forbes, who referred to the all-white club as - I kid you not - “historically homogenous”
And when was the last time you saw a mainstream media outlet couch an allegation related to race against a conservative with the term ‘allegedly’?
I mean, Whitehouse admits to the premise here! @NBCNews
@MSNBC could only muster a brief mention of the incident - of course w/ the “allegedly” qualifier - but it reminded me of how they relayed @SenWhitehouse’s (now very rich) gripe about “11 white male Republican senators” who questioned Blasey-Ford back when.
Pots, kettles, etc.
It’s particularly jarring when you see how outlets talked about race-related issues for people who aren’t elected Democrats.
Again. Very interesting how @washingtonpost frames this episode vs. @SenatorTimScott’s suggestion that America isn’t a de facto racist country (although it seems Sen. Whitehouse’s beach club may not be as progressive)
Plenty of outlets haven’t even touched this one at all.
@CNN, do you think a “controversial” pageant from decades ago involving an actress is more important for the American people to know about than a sitting senator belonging to a segregated beach club?
Speaking of Ellie Kemper, look at the difference between how @YahooNews couches/frames the situation with @SenWhitehouse vs. how they did with Kempell.
Again, for Whitehouse, we just get “exclusive,” & his defense that being racist is just “a long tradition in Rhode Island”
Do we really think that @NPR, who’s had no issue calling everything from birds and the 2nd amendment to Tom Hanks’ acting career (??) racist can’t find the time to figure out whether @SenWhitehouse’s activities might be questionable?
Still no mention of it.
Also, some history: @SenWhitehouse said back in 2006 (!) that he’d leave the club & again in 2017 that he would advocate for diversity.
He’s conceded - repeatedly - that this place that his wife has an ownership stake in has a race problem. This isn’t disputed.
All of a sudden we’re left with “exclusive” or “elite” which is…a curious way to describe places that restrict guests based on skin color.
In case you’ve been living under a rock, we’ve had a serious reckoning over the last 14 months about race in this country. More than (probably) most conservatives, I think that’s a good thing.
But why do white Democratic senators get a pass in the media?
The media has incredible power to cover topics as racially problematic (or not). We’ve seen lots of folks take creative liberty in the use of the term lately.
But when there’s a pretty cut-and-dry case against a Democrat, those voices are conspicuously silent.
If the media wants to have any moral high ground on issues of race, they’ve gotta be better here.
Holding @SenWhitehouse accountable would be a good place to start.
It appears @CNN did post a piece. I’ll re-up my earlier criticism:
Okay I assumed that WaPo video couldn’t be as bad as people were saying but I watched it and it is so much worse, to a point where I can’t even describe it. Just watch: washingtonpost.com/video/the-lily…
“White accountability groups are really helpful” this must be a spoof
“White people need to start getting together, specifically about race” no no guys I’m no expert here but I’m quite confident that this is part of the problem
In the last two months, @staceyabrams has gone from calling proposed voting laws “Jim Crow in a suit and tie” to something no one ever objected to and, rather than rightly point out the gaslighting, @washingtonpost and @AaronBlake called it “an evolution”
The piece calls the new tone from Dems “a significant rhetorical concession” and I really just can’t imagine any member of the media treating this bald-faced hypocrisy the same if Abrams had an R after her name.
Abrams and the Democrats lied about voter IDs, slandered their Republican colleagues as racist, and now are backtracking because polling has - once again - shown that the American people support voter ID laws.
Even in a golden age of political grift, @SenWhitehouse’s attempt to appear committed to the cause of racial equity while consolidating his ownership of an all-white club is…something.
@SenWhitehouse, when you told Judge Rao to “join the club” were you talking about your own?
That this small detail is omitted from the tweet and headline not only means this piece Is pushing CCP propaganda, it’s not actually informing the reader.
Hooooly shit this is bad: “Vaccinating a country of 1.4 billion people against Covid-19 is a massive undertaking. Due to China's successful containment of the coronavirus, many residents initially saw little urgency in getting vaccinated.”
They don’t mention the awful success rate of this vaccine. I’m losing my mind. Some trials have it at only 50%! And the places who’ve relied on the Chinese vax (look up new cases/deaths in Bahrain and Chile) are seeing spikes.
I don't agree with all of it (naturally) but this piece is really, really brilliant. If you're looking for a smart writer who'll challenge your worldview, Goerge Packer is a great one. theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…