🚛 Here is an interesting fact - it’s end of June and we don’t yet have a functioning border management system.

Remember the Goods Vehicle Movement Service (GVMS)? The system that was supposed to be first implemented in January to manage our borders?

/1
Remember how we all talked about the fact that you don’t build IT systems in a few months? That they require testing etc? And how Gov was sure it will be ready?

It wasn’t ready so the full implementation was pushed back to June.

/2
A while back, together with all the announcements around further easements and extensions, GVMS was pushed back to Jan 2022.

/3
The thing is I’m not entirely sure whether the whole extension of deferred customs declarations and suspension of full controls on the UK border wasn’t caused by just this – the IT system not being ready.

/4
So where are we with this?

It’s being tested with the hope of getting it ready for Jan 2022. A year after it should have been implemented.

/5
Meanwhile, the French built and implemented their smart border system, SI Brexit, on time.

Cause they started preparing it earlier.

You really can't make these things up.

6/6

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Anna Jerzewska

Dr Anna Jerzewska Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnnaJerzewska

22 Jun
An article on the top 5 benefits of joining the CPTPP written by the UK's Chief Negotiator for accession to CPTPP - so basically the right person to ask.

Read it carefully cause the wording is very important here.

/1


linkedin.com/pulse/top-5-be…
It kind of hints at opportunities rather than promises results.

Important to remember that some companies will be in a position to profit from these benefits and others will not.

/2
E.e.
“could boost UK exports” - doesn’t mean that it will, there is potential but it will depend on a range of company/industry-specific factors

“will make it simpler for the UK to sell services” – relative to now and subject to conditions in the text.

/3
Read 5 tweets
22 Jun
So the UK started the CPTPP negotiations today. And the benefits of joining according to Gov's own estimates are... moderate at best... 0.08%.

And that is if they have taken into account all the bilateral deals that the UK already has with CPTPP members

/1
These deals will take away from the impact of the CPTPP.

Joe also mentioned the caveat in the report.
Measuring the impact of FTAs before they are implemented or negotiated is tricky and can only provide a rough estimate.

/2


CGE modelling is static and doesn't take all the expected benefits of an FTA into account.

Given all the bilateral deals joining the CPTPP is mostly around strategic and geopolitical objectives.

Plus regional cumulation, some stuff on digital and other bits and pieces.

/3
Read 8 tweets
20 Jun
Yet again I have to ask - how is this so much of a surprise?

The referendum took place 5 years ago, almost to the day. And yet it seems that ppl are only now realising what are the effects of leaving the EU.

/1


bbc.com/news/uk-englan…
See the quote below.

From the moment the UK settled on an FTA- style relationship it was clear that various border formalities will be required.

There are strict rules around moving live animals into the EU from the outside.

/2
They are incredibly labour-intensive and come with plenty of extra costs.

They have also been around for a while AND the UK applied these rules to imports from 3rd countries when it was a member of the EU.

And yet...

/3
Read 8 tweets
17 Jun
More on the UK-Australia deal here 👇

/1
Again with the wording is exaggerated.

This is most likely self-certification by exporter or importer. Which is standard in recent trade deals.

You're not cutting any red tape with that cause there was no red tape to begin with. It was always going to be self-certification

/2 Image
Also, the problems with, or the burden of, of proving origin doesn't happen at the border.

So most of it is fairly generic at the moment but some interesting bits there. Like RVC 25% for cars.

/3 Image
Read 5 tweets
15 Jun
Remember how before Brexit we were talking about driver shortages?

While it's not getting much coverage these days it's very much still a thing
Earlier this year a logistics provider mentioned that drivers were quitting and that shortages were unavoidable
And it's only going to get worse
Read 4 tweets
14 Jun
And then Art 6 👇

/2 Image
Notice that unfettered access is only for NI-GB movements.

For GB-NI it's "best endeavours to facilitate trade".

Trade facilitation means making border processes more efficient but not removing formalities and checks.

/3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(