I also fucking LOVE that you think in the final paragraph UEFA have to define what the rainbow colours mean. Just so you can simultaneously hide behind them in your shitty press releases but also use them to maintain your squeaky clean reputation.
And that seems to exclusively attract sociopaths, narcissists and megolomaniacs.
That isn't to say every single person working for them is this. There will be some who genuinely love football and want to change
the world for the better.
But those people will never get anywhere near any position of power as they would become a threat to what has now become the global criminal enterprise masquerading as a governing body.
Like-minded people will only be allowed in the circle of trust.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Liverpool fans crying about however many hundreds of millions that City can spend on players this summer.
It is almost as if some of you are just working out why FFP was necessary. Give it some time, maybe you will also work out why you can't red-line to financially compete with
them. Or not. That one takes a bit more of the old brain meat. But it goes something like this -
if you are spending most of your revenue on wages, you cannot also spend most of your revenue on transfer fees. Because whatever you win never cover it. And invariable, only 1 of
teams blowing the GDP of a small country on transfer fees will actually win. And no matter what happens, City can just keep spending because the losses are written off as the cost to launder the image of their despot owner.
Eventually though, the other clubs get into financial
Starting Sanches tonight just shows how good Portugal could be if they started matches with 11 players instead of 10.
As I say that, Bruno gives the ball away - Portugal win it back, give it back to Bruno, who somehow kicks it out behind himself for a throwin while trying to dribble. Wft
He has just never looked the same player for Portugal as he does at United. The difference between being the lynchpin in one system build around him, and being the supporting cast for Ronaldo.
The thing is, it starts to get complicated with squad places. You probably carry 4 CB into a normal season. We need to go in with at least 5 but likely 6 next season. And if we take the same approach in midfield, and 3 goalkeepers (given Kelleher now needs a place due to age)
then it all starts to add up. This is our squad from last season.
8 home-grown, 16/17 who are not
We need to add to this
Ibrahima Konaté (free space)
Virgil van Dijk (replace Gini)
Ben Davies (replace Hardy)
We have Marko Grujić coming back from injury who needs to be sold
or a squad place. You would imagine if we were to move on any of Adrian, Matip, Shaq, Taki, Origi - we get a like-for-like replacement. If we move on Ox or Phillips we need a homegrown player to replace them.
But this all makes manoeuvring in the market complicated as the
The reason the whole Trent debate starts off flawed for me is the beginning premise being they are all the same thing. They aren't really.
First all, roles are far more important than positions in football. What Roberto Carlos did for Brazil isn't the same as what Konchesky did
at Fulham.
Which is why Hodgson sees no value in the former, tells him he isn't a left back, then sells him. Yet the latter, he brings with him to Liverpool as his only signing from his previous club.
But the more important thing is this:
How many teams' key player is a full back? It is incredibly rare. Trent is a transformative player. His talent is such that Klopp built his entire system around him (and Robbo) with them taking on the role of primary progressers