As someone who started on a council estate, living with grandparents, single mum working in another part of the country ... this ... 100% this ... youth services, grants, libraries, investment in schools etc made all the difference ->
Oh, and I ended up going to Cambridge but that was long ago. If I had been born in today's climate with the same start ... I doubt that would have happened. Nothing to do with people saying "white privilege", everything to do with destruction of the state and supporting systems.
Of course, if I hadn't gone to University, I'd never have come up with mapping which itself has saved this Gov £millions. I'd love to see a study on just how much austerity has actually cost us ... we'll never know of course but I suspect the answer is vastly more than it saved.
But then that would require people to investigate causes and this narrative is the opposite of that ... it's about trying to set one disadvantaged group against another in order to avoid any investigation, any discussion, any progress and any real challenge to the status quo.
If they really want to "level up" then start by refunding surestart, invest in local services, expand the social net, introduce UBI, abolish private schools and reform the house of lords with sortition (random selection). It's a start but it'll set us on a better path.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
X : What interesting emerging technology have you seen? Cloud?AI?
Me : None of that is emerging and the question is irrelevant. What you should be interested in is the emerging behaviours / practice. The technology just supports this.
X : Like DevOps.
Me : Not emerging. A given.
X : What is emerging then?
Me : This. A next generation of behaviours.
X : Hmmm, I don't agree.
Me : Hmmm, I don't care. I have a population study to counter your or my opinion.
X : Well, how do I do leaderless leadership?
Me : The whole field of distributed leadership is emerging. There is no guide yet, there are just companies experimenting in this space. You asked for emerging.
X : I should experiment?
Me : Depends.
X : You argue for sortition?
Me : A democratic system (with debates, majority voting, two representative houses) but representatives chosen by lottery not by election i.e. 4 people from each region, giving 2.600 MPs serving for 4 years with 1/4 replaced each year ...
... the problem we have is that elections do not create a representative parliament, there are lots of barriers to becoming an MP etc. We have 90k people in my district and our MP is Damian Collins ... as far as I can tell, random selection would on average find someone better.
So, 4 people selected at random from each district, each serving for four years with 1/4 replaced each year ... I can't see how you wouldn't end up with a better quality of candidates in the houses of parliament and a more effective government.
X : Have you seen the attacks on @MattHancock
Me : No.
X : Boris Johnson brands Matt Hancock hopeless in texts revealed by Dominic Cummings - bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Me : Ah. Let me guess, Gove's pitbull trying to keep Gove in the game again? I'll read it later.
X : You think Hancock has done a good job?
Me : He has done alright given the hand dealt i.e. the whole herd immunity, wait for too long, direct to PM reporting lines on test and trace, try not to upset economy etc. The vaccine program has been extremely well run by the NHS etc.
X : You think Hancock would make a better PM than Boris?
Me : Always have. He was meant to be the fall guy in this debacle, he has done pretty well which is why the attacks are probably happening.
X : You've been quiet.
Me : Writing up research. I tend to get very mono-focused.
X : What's the research on?
Me : How organisations are changing - swardley.medium.com/how-organisati…
X : So, what do you think about ...
Me : ... no. I need to focus.
X : I was going to ask about radicalisation?
Me : Gosh, Huge subject from medical conspiracy theories - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… - to counter radicalisation with bots - rand.org/content/dam/ra…
X : Did that come up in your research?
Me : Yes.
X : Well?
Me : I need to prioritise.
X : What does that mean?
Me : It means, see you in about 1-2 weeks. Ask me then. Not now.
X : Could Gamestop lead to radicalisation against firms for environmental impact?
Me : Yes. Already starting in some ways - insureourfuture.us/updates/2020/1…. Now, I must dive back in. Cya soon.
X : Thoughts on self driving cars?
Me : Hmmm ... that's a bit broad. What are you after?
X : A good thing?
Me : Yes but I have concerns.
X : Safety?
Me : No. Three other concerns ...
... if I look at the map (about 6 years old now), my concerns are
a) Route management through digital subscription models leading to social inequality on roads (i.e. pricing someone to get out of your way) and geo fencing (i.e. no go areas if you're the wrong subscription) ...
... beyond embedding social inequality and geo fencing, then my next concern would be :-
b) imposition of values through the training systems for the AIs themselves.
I'd like to know whose values are we imposing? I talked about this many many years ago, I am still concerned.
However, that said ... we should always look towards creating better maps.
I think we are getting close to the time, as a community, that we need to define this more, to determine the axioms of mapping.
X : How?
Me : How what?
X : Create the axioms?
Me : Ah, part of what the mapping foundation will need to do.
X : Who is on the foundation?
Me : It hasn't been formed but ... I suspect you want to know who will get to decide?
X : Yes
Me : Sortition.