As a reminder here are my two articles which were important to reporting on the unfolding events... Thanks again for @davidpugliese amazing reporting and for picking up on what I discovered and sharing it with Canada! occrp.org/en/blog/13225-…
“senior leaders had no authority to conduct such initiatives” - hugely important outcomes from the investigations into this situation… it’s great 🇨🇦 took it seriously and I hope real changes will result!
“The investigation found the Canadian Joint Operations Command headquarters not only didn’t follow established policy but such an initiative was never requested in the first place by the federal government.”
The reporting was dismissed by some personnel with little understanding as overreaction or misunderstanding of the events. I wonder if now they will reconsider their comments???
There’s MORE! “even after the then-chief of the defence staff, Jonathan Vance, verbally called off the overall influence campaign in April 2020, some influence activities aimed at Canadians carried on for another six months” cbc.ca/amp/1.6079084#…
It is vital that the abandonment of democratic values and restraint not become recast as
innovation.
Political Communication departments please when you are writing your recruitment ads and planning your futures can you try and keep a little open minded? Always you specify scholars who use quantitative methods, data analytics and surveys focused on understanding public 1/
opinion and political behavior… you ask for people studying power by focusing only on the powerless - some of us take a normative position that marginalised communities & indeed the public in general get researched and poked and prodded and experimented on to understand what 2/
makes them tick A LOT already… because we are visible - while powerful people and systems they use to control are not in focus and remain under researched because they are difficult to study and opaque. 3/
HUGE NEWS breaking on #CambridgeAnalytica parent #SCL’s partnerships in the Passports industry: “three separate introduction agreements were found between Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL) and Henley & Partners.”
First “dated 25 February 2010, stated that Henley & Partners would act as an introducer for SCL, and would refer potential political client parties to SCL in exchange for a percentage of any resulting revenue from that client.”
“On 22 March that year, Henley & Partners approved the referral agreement with SCL. Another two unsigned agreements, dated August and September 2010, were also found...
3 years ago my #CambridgeAnalytica and #SCL evidence was published by @CommonsDCMS Fake News Inquiry. You cannot know how hard, how terrifying it was. 3 years on I still live, write, publish in constant threat but I grow stronger, fight harder with a little help from my friends.
Often I am seeing what is being classified as disinformation is done so based on output which leads to it being misclassified, the producers of content are sometimes just wrong, producing misinformation based on error/ideological thinking rather than deliberate falsehood.
This difference should REALLY matter to researchers and for policy... people need to be allowed to get things wrong. The response to this needs to be journalism, fact-checking, education but also listening to and addressing the real world cause of a deficit of trust.
Fuelling misinformation is the problem that there is good reason for distrust in government, politics, platforms, big corporations, media organizations -transparency and independent regulation is essential to restore trust inc influence industry firms that profit from it all.
US medicine containers confound me. They make regular stuff like aspirin impossible to get into, impenetrable to old folks, and then I buy the stuff you can make crack out of which you need ID to buy and it’s in super easy pop out pill packs.
It really makes no sense there seems to be no standardisation. The Sudafed stuff is super easy to get into the packs and that’s stuff that they’ve had problems controlling. And regular meds are impossible to get into. Why not do it the other way round?
Put the stuff that lunatics turn into drugs in the difficult packs?! 🤷🏻♀️ No idea!
I don’t think anyone said ‘don’t engage with journalists’ and it’s unfortunate the reply doesn’t respond to much of my critique let alone speak to the experience of the excluded voices, ignored experiences and their real world delegitimising effects. However,
I’m glad to have this interesting conversation develop within the pages of @WIRED and the Twittersphere with you @pnhoward and I hope that others will also think about and engage with these questions of how we research the influence industry.
The economics & media values of journalism necessarily limit what it will look for / cover - this & opaque nature of the influence firms & their campaigns mean researchers can’t shy from hard to study aspects of the problem and must try and take them on in a robust academic way.