This would have a larger impact on your day-to-day life than almost anything the government does. Biden has said he wants to make grants conditioned on towns 1) allowing apartments and townhouses ANYWHERE and 2) permitting subdividing any lot to fit as many houses as possible.
Like your picket fence, big backyard & wooded views? An apartment could go up next door, and you won't be able to buy an acre elsewhere because a developer will pay more to put five houses on it.
This is outside federal control, but localities will have their arms twisted by $.
Classic "equity": Cities are crowded&crime-filled, so it's not fair that some people live there while others live in pleasant suburbs. Therefore, make the suburbs more crowded
It's also a major problem for Dems: most people of all races live in suburbs and like them how they are
Don't overlook the "minimum lot size" element. Because most people don't actually want to live in dense, urban environments, the primary effect will be a boon for real estate developers who will carve up spacious suburban lots to pack in McMansions of white people. Goodbye trees.
The fundamental divide in America is urban vs non-urban. The Dem infrastructure bill's goal is to force people to live in dense housing on top of each other. No one likes the quality of life, but people who live in dense areas vote Dem.
The only people who will get to live in ordinary, American-dream suburbs if the infrastructure bill goes this way are the richest of the rich whose towns can simply turn down huge sums of "infrastructure" grants because, like everyone else, they don't want to accept these strings
Of course, the millions of dollars being offered will ultimately be a net loss when you impoverish your town by putting apartments and townhouses throughout single-family neighborhoods, leading to less tax revenue and higher costs permanently.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The head of Google's "Ethical AI" team advocated for making its language processors dumber because training them on large amounts of text could risk the robot reading materials predating "BLM" and "MeToo" and because training caused carbon emissions.
She threatened to quit unless she was given the names of those who crossed her, so Google accepted her resignation.
The other co-leader was a feminist who complained of “nebulous complaints to HR about her personality,” and "exfiltrated" emails to try to show "discrimination."
A school board member who recently said Israel "desecrates the Holy Land" used a graduation speech to warn mostly-immigrant students they’re entering a world of “capitalism” & “white supremacy” and encourage them to remember “jihad” & reject objectivity.
Omeish explains how teachers turn students into political activists, ignoring "pushback," then administrators are pressed to adopt policies on the notion that children want it.
The speech came at Justice HS, whose name was selected by the board after discarding residents' choice
She seemed to "clap back" at fellow Dems' criticism of her anti-Israel rhetoric, saying people “may seek to intimidate you or make you think the truth is controversial,” but "haters" are "a sign you’re unsettling the status quo towards justice."
Basically this case comes down to:
> Oil companies like Chevron are bad
>> OK, but in this instance, you totally fabricated all the evidence against them in a brazen shakedown attempt and relied on bribed a judge to make your case
> Why are you siding with someone bad!?
It's a clear attempt to politicize the judiciary, where someone's culpability rests not on whether they actually did something, but on whether they're popular under identity politics, etc.
Cooper also accompanied Joe Biden on a trip to Mexico.
Cooper is an international investor and gambling CEO who had a deal with Hunter for equity sharing on "various projects dealing with both domestic and international transactions."
“In order to develop this as a platform for both JRBs I think it is imperative we (the three of us) have full control come 2016 when JRB1 comes on board,” Hunter wrote to Jeff Cooper in November 2014.
"Keep teaching! Just don’t make everything visible on Canvas. This is not being deceitful. This is just doing what you have done for years. Prior to the pandemic you didn’t send everything home or have it available. You taught in your classroom and things were peachy keen."
"Anything that could be picked apart I would suggest using this above approach… I wouldn’t throw it out, but you could just not give them access to the story.
When you get to Power Imbalances – You might remove the two examples and just go over them in class (same as above)."
Software company Basecamp announced Monday that it was a company focused on developing software -- not an entity that should try to shape Americans’ political opinions, engineer its employees’ personal lives, or take positions on unrelated public debates.
Basecamp is known for expertise in organizational management. It produces efficiency software, heralded remote work a decade ago, and wrote a book on "calm" offices.
Politics at work is a “distraction. It saps our energy, and redirects our dialog towards dark places,” CEO wrote
"By trying to have the debates around such incredibly sensitive societal politics inside the company, we’re setting ourselves up for strife, with little chance of actually changing anyone’s mind.
It’s become ever more stressful, unnerving, and counterproductive."