1/ A “Sightless Among Miracles” is a sculpture that celebrates Ivermectin. A son is guiding his blind father, a fate of millions of adults who were losing sight. Lives destroyed, communities decimated.
A 2015 Nobel prize recognised drug has saved these people from misery.
A🧵
2/ How come Ivermectin is now a “dirty” word? Its pioneer Dr Pierre Kory of @Covid19Critical moves around YouTube “like a ghost leaving suspensions and blackened warning screens everywhere he went”. (words @mtaibbi) taibbi.substack.com/p/why-has-iver…
4) because of “The Ivy”, a voice of consciousness in academia, the core member of the intellectual dark web @BretWeinstein finds his YouTube videos taken down by “fact-checkers” who, probably, don’t have even a quarter of a PhD among them. odysee.com/@BretWeinstein…?
5/ Oxford Uni added Ivermectin to their nationwide clinical study PRINCIPLE on 12/05/2021. It took BBC just six weeks to report it. In a meantime, they run the piece with obligatory claim “There is no evidence that ivermectin can prevent or cure Covid-19” bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-tre…
6/ PRINCIPLE is going to try 0.3 mg/kg for 3 days which is lower than the @Covid19Critical and @BIRDGroupUK I-MASS 0.4-0.6 mg/kg for 5 days. The trial is without the recommended combo.
7/ Like many, I can’t square Merck’s recent statement claiming “lack of safety data on Ivermectin” with the fact that Merck (yes, same company) donated over 4 billion doses and produced fantastic outreach resources to promote Ivy’s safety and efficacy.
8/ I don’t believe in The Evil Big Pharma, but I know what people make mistakes and people with influence (e.g. Big Pharma CEO) make mistakes that cost hundreds of billions in taxpayer money. Their mistakes cost lives too. On some occasions, those were millions of lives.
9/ The Big Pharma and Big Tech are just businesses, seizing an opportunity to make money.
It’s up to us and our elected representatives, to restrain those appetites.
It’s us who needs to read, think, ask questions and make a compassionate effort to reach out to “others”.
10/ We need to follow Oxford Uni’s trial, it is our responsibility to cheer for a drug, that is:
1)Safe
2)Cheap
3)Readily available in large quantities
4)The most promising *early* COVID-19 treatment so far
People who don’t want or can’t have existing COVID-19 vaccines have the right to a different option!
Actually, PRINCIPLE is enrolling vaccinated people as well. This is great. They will need this treatment too.
I hear some vaccinated citizens credit themselves with bringing Covid cases down. I know vaccines are working but would like to point out some data that weakens their claim.
We need to consider other factors and start an honest discussion of other tools.
A short thread
1/
Thanks to MSM we all know that it was LD2 and then LD3 plus vaccines that squashed the two most recent waves in the UK.
What MSM here omitted to mention is the fact that in some countries not far away the same pattern was seen without LDs and mass vaccinations. 2/
My parents (69 and 73) went to church and jazz gigs all winter and held their traditional Saturday dinners for our extended family.
I did a thread a few months back about the December surge coming and going while people in Ukraine enjoyed themselves. 3/
Fauci's emails stating the obvious (masks in the community are useless) energised mask zealots. They go around and post this paper in comments, claiming "science evolved and masks now work".
People who wrote it knew that CDC and its European equivalent found no solid evidence to support the usefulness of cloth masks.
CDC: "We found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks" wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26…
ECDC: ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/… 2/
yet PNAS paper: "we recommend the adoption of public cloth mask wearing, ... in conjunction with existing hygiene, distancing, and contact tracing strategies".
That's problem #1: claim masks work while not able to show they do a thing as a measure in its own right
3/
"It's just a piece of cloth" and "I am saving lives". What is supposed to mean "I am very brave, smart and heroic"
A thread about a "piece of cloth" as a sign of a massive brainwash. It's aimed at those who know "a piece of cloth" don't stop infection, but wear it to conform.
It's me and you can see I am very happy. This is because I was admitted to the Young Pioneers.
The piece of cloth is a Pioneer's Red Necktie and it's a status symbol (brave, smart, heroic). It probably also stops viruses (well, to the same extent as the cloth masks do).
I was admitted in the first batch, among the best pupils. Less dedicated would have their ceremony a few weeks later, weak and naughty -- a year later. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_…
There were weirdos who would refuse The Red Tie. They refused to follow Communist Party teaching!
1/10 My sisters, my nieces and their friends with kids have spent last week in Ukrainian Carpathian Mountains, skiing, mingling, and having all sorts of fun. facebook.com/10000343646269…
2/10 My Ukrainian uncle has celebrated his 71st birthday. He coached hundreds of kids in competitive sailing, some then went on to become national champions. They wanted to drop in and give him a hug! He also held a party at the local restaurant.
3/10 My former University of Glasgow colleague, who is now a Director of the Doctoral School at Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (a Uni in Kyiv) posted photos of his birthday bash at work last week.