1/14
Zhou Chengjun, the PBoCs head of research, points out the inevitable conflict that major reserve-currency status brings (what I call "the exorbitant burden": "On one hand," he says, "are the goals of domestic monetary policy, on the other are...

caixinglobal.com/2021-06-24/opi…
2/14
the responsibilities and obligations as issuer of the global reserve currency. It is nearly impossible for the monetary authority to consider domestic goals and international roles at the same time."
3/14
Zhou is right, of course, but he then argues that this dilemma is why USD's role must decline in favor of RMB. He doesn't seem to recognize that in fact China faces a much more damaging form of this very same dilemma, which is why for all the talk in the past 15 years...
4/14
about the rise of the RMB, it's role has barely changed, even as the Chinese shares of global GDP and global trade have risen sharply.

The fact is that given the huge imbalances in the Chinese economy, its heavy reliance on debt to generate growth in economic...
5/14
activity, and the insolvency of much of its financial system, China has far less room to sacrifice domestic financial control in order to expand the RMB's international role. It hasn't done so in the past and it is already worried...
6/14
about the consequence of further opening up, even though foreign participation in Chinese financial markets is still a fraction of what it would have to be before the RMB mattered.

By the way I do expect that the role of the US dollar eventually to decline, and for...
7/14
the reasons Zhou suggests, but only as it becomes increasingly evident to US policymakers and voters that the cost to the US economy of the current conditions is excessive. When that happens, I don't expect the USD decline to be matched by the rise of a rival currency.
8/14
Much more likely, I think, is a sharp reduction in global imbalances and global financial flows, and perhaps the partial rise of a synthetic currency like the SDR. For all the talk in China and Europe (and, not so long ago, in Japan) no one else will be willing to pay...
9/14
the exorbitant cost of absorbing global excess savings.

As an aside, I am re-reading the memoirs of Herbert Feis (one of the few senior financial advisors in both the Hoover and the Roosevelt administrations) about 1933, including the London Conference, and it...
10/14
really struck me that no matter how much FDR insisted on refusing to tie the US dollar to gold until the dollar's purchasing power had been restored, the financial experts representing the US at the conference were simply incapable of understanding him.
11/13
They were unable even to imagine a world in which currencies were not pegged to gold, and so they kept misrepresenting FDR's position. That's why the famous "bombshell" announcement by FDR was such a bombshell.
12/14
This may have a bearing on the future role of USD. I think Wall Street bankers and financiers (not to mention the defense and foreign affairs establishments) are genuinely convinced that what is best for them (the global primacy of USD) is also best for the US.
13/14
That is why without someone like FDR, who was not at all impressed by the expertise of financiers, which he always considered highly self-interested, it will prove very difficult to convince Washington that in fact the global primacy of USD is bad...
14/14
for American workers, farmers and small and medium businesses. We have been, and will continue to be, stuck with the exorbitant burden far longer than we need.
Caixin has now published the second part of this speech. It is worth reading to see just how much (unresolved) conflict there is between the desire to maintain control of the financial system and the recognition that internationalizing the RMB means giving up that control.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

27 Jun
1/11
In the second part of his important speech, Zhou Chengjun, the PBoC’s head of research, argues that “an international currency’s exchange rate arises from the large number of transactions conducted by currency holders around the world.

caixinglobal.com/2021-06-25/why…
2/11
It is not decided by the central bank that issues the currency. Aside from that issuance, the central bank has no decision-making power.” He goes on to conclude that “we have no choice but to acknowledge that in the context of RMB internationalization, we can’t control...
3/11
its exchange rate, and the PBOC would ultimately relinquish any hopes of determining its exchange rate.”

This is an important point in a heated debate within China about the extent to which Beijing will allow international considerations to trump domestic ones.
Read 11 tweets
26 Jun
1/8
From a very feisty 1933 FDR letter: “A financial element in the largest centers has owned the Government since the days of Andrew Jackson. The country is going through a repetition of Jackson’s fight with the Bank of the United States – only on a bigger and broader basis.” Image
2/8
Although the account by Feis of the events of that time is not always disinterested, he does a great job of showing just how politically complex financial policymaking can be. What really strikes me is the intellectual dissonance between FDR and his financial advisors.
3/8
While FDR wasn’t always sure about what he wanted when it came to US monetary policy, he had a pretty clear vision of what he didn’t want, and for him stabilizing the value of the USD dollar in international markets was simply not nearly as important as managing...
Read 8 tweets
26 Jun
1/4
Consumer spending accounted for 54.3% of China's GDP last year, compared with an average of 53.4% between 2011 and 2019, according to the NDRC. This compares to 70-80% typical of developed economies.

global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202106/25/WS…
2/4
In a recent speech Zhi Shuping said that Beijing will continue to focus on ensuring the recovery of consumption. More efforts are needed to boost the purchasing power of consumers, he said, and to improve consumption policies and the overall consumption environment.
3/4
Local policymakers have made a big show of Improving consumption polices and the consumption environment, whatever that means, but in fact these things don't matter much except to reapportion spending. They don't have much impact on rebalancing spending.
Read 4 tweets
25 Jun
1/4
I disagree. They couldn't as long as they set unrealistically high GDP growth targets, and that's precisely the point. This has been a problem for years, and was made clear by some astonishing statements a few years ago by the Ministry of Rails.
2/4
What is more, for years Beijing has been promising to cut back on property and infrastructure spending, and on the debt associated with it, but they have always expanded or contracted it as needed to achieve the GDP growth target.
3/4
This investment has been, in other words, a residual that expands when what they call "high-quality" is lower and contracts when high-quality growth is higher. Last year for example when high-quality growth was negative, it expanded to represent nearly 200% of total growth.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jun
1/4
Cash WMPs are WMPs that can be redeemed daily. Banks have issued an amount equal to roughly 8% of China's annual GDP.

As Caixin points out, these "are often marketed as delivering returns much higher than ordinary deposit rates, pushing banks to...

caixinglobal.com/2021-06-24/in-…
2/4
invest in risky assets or extend loans to highly leveraged companies, such as property developers. A chief goal of the government’s new WMP rules is to ban banks from guaranteeing returns on investments, a long-standing practice that encourages investors to dump money...
3/4
into risky, high-yielding assets while expecting state protection if the underlying investments fail."

Because banks earn WMP fees by investing depositors money in risky assets while protecting them from any associated loss, this seems a reasonable enough goal, one that...
Read 4 tweets
23 Jun
1/6
While it is true that 99% of what anti-MMTers say about MMT is nonsense, it is also true that 90% of what MMT proponents say about MMT is also nonsense. The tweet below is a typical example of the latter. Academic economists have long focused on the real economy while...
2/6
ignoring balance sheets and money, and MMT was one of the ways in which to redress this, but it seems that some of its more naive proponents have now decided that MMT means you can ignore the real economy. That's one of the reasons why Hyman Minsky was so important:
3/6
he insisted that the real economy must be understood in terms also of balance sheet constraints.

The mistake that the most naive MMTers make is their failure to understand that there is always a real constraint to borrowing — real debt-servicing capacity — even for...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(