@shipwreckedcrew the "Russian guy" was the person to whom Danchenko attributed pee tape story. And the FBI interviewed him about Danchenko within (literally) one week, maximum two, of the supposed exchange of "information" about pee tape. So yes, files need to be searched.
@shipwreckedcrew 2/ furthermore, when Crossfire Hurricane analysts learned that Danchenko was Steele's Primary Sub-Source in late Dec/early Jan, it is inconceivable that they didn't search "Danchenko" name in FBI files. If they didn't, FBI is even more incompetent than we thought.
@shipwreckedcrew 3/ regardless of what Vorontsov may or may not have said in the June 2016 interview, Danchenko was already on FBI radar and the search of records by analysts in Dec 2016 ought to have turned up these records. If they didn't, then more incompetence.
@shipwreckedcrew 4/ but stuff really hits the fan when Danchenko named Vorontsov as Source 2 and attributed pee tape story to him. From their December search of FBI files, analysts would be aware that FBI had interviewed Vorontsov in June 2016.
@shipwreckedcrew 5/ by this time, FBI analysts must have realized that Steele dossier was a total clusterf and that FBI had totally deceived intel community and departing Obama admin about credibility of Steele as a source. So what did Auten do? He buried it all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
