#SCOTUS decision(s) at the top of the hour. We don’t know which or how many of the 8 remaining cases we’ll get today, but those left include both the voting rights and financial disclosure cases.
First #SCOTUS decision is in TransUnion v. Ramirez, a standing decision in a Fair Credit Reporting Act case. Kavanaugh writes the 5-4 decision for the court finding the plaintiffs lacked standing. Thomas, joined by the liberal justices, dissents. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
Thomas is not happy.
Second decision is HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining v. Renewable Fuels Assoc. Gorsuch has the 6-3 court opinion; Barrett the dissent. A first: An all-men v. all-women lineup. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
* = first under the current court's composition, that is
Another time this happened, historically, that immediately comes to mind is Utah v. Strieff. oyez.org/cases/2015/14-…
To return to TransUnion for a second, this is a big standing decision that could have far-reaching consequences for ordinary people seeking to hold actors responsible for illegal acts.
There will be at least one more decision.
The final #SCOTUS decision today is Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis. Sotomayor has the opinion for the court holding that certain Alaska tribal groups are eligible for tribal CARES Act funding. Gorsuch, Thomas, and Kagan dissent. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
With that, 5 #SCOTUS decisions remain outstanding, including both the voting rights and financial disclosure cases.
Sometime in the next hour or so, 11 years ago tonight, I ordered a drink at Cobalt. It was a totally ordinary moment. I was blacked out, also ordinary, so I really have no recollection of it. I had no clue that I would choose for 4,019 days since then not to have another drink.
I’ve talked about the path I’ve traveled often over the past years, at this mark and other moments. It really is an incredible gift, this sobriety that I’ve found — and the people who helped me keep it once I found it are just as, if not more, incredible.
That was no more apparent than over the past year, when everyone was tested — and when sobriety, for some, was a huge challenge to maintain. It wasn’t for me, luckily. I’ve, so far as I can tell, had that burden lifted. I still had life, though, and parts of it really sucked.
It was only 18 years ago today that the Supreme Court held that sodomy laws—laws effectively criminalizing queer people’s lives—were unconstitutional. In other words, if you turned 18 before today, same-sex sexual activity could be prosecuted in parts of the US during your life.
While we celebrate LGBTQ Pride In many parts of the country this weekend, only people turning 18 today and after will not have lived under valid sodomy laws in parts of the country.
Lawrence v. Texas was argued in my first year of law school, and its consideration figured into the reasons why I started my Law Dork blog back in the day. It was some of my first ~considered~ writing about the law, but I’m so glad I kept learning. And wrote so much more.
Breaking: DOJ is suing the state of Georgia under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, alleging discrimination against Black voters in the state in its recent voting changes, AG Garland announces. justice.gov/live
Garland says guidance will be forthcoming regarding redistricting, in light of the fact that this likely will be the first redistricting year in recent decades without the preclearance provision of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in force.
Garland also announces a new directive from DOJ to federal law enforcement about prioritizing prosecution of threats against election officials.
#SCOTUS opinions coming shortly. Reminder: There are 12 decisions remaining — including voting rights, financial disclosure, student speech rights, and more. As always, we don’t know which or how many decisions are coming.
First #SCOTUS decision is in Lange v. California. Kagan has the opinion for the court, holding that police pursuing a fleeing misdemeanor suspect do not "categorically" have justification to enter a home without a warrant. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
It's basically a 7-2 decision, although there are some caveats there (see opinion and below). Roberts, joined by Alito, thinks the court goes too far, saying that flight is, itself, an exigent circumstance that would allow warrantless entry.
I swear to god, we could have 70 races where the reformist candidate wins, and these people will wait for the one race where the retrograde candidate wins (is ahead, here), and act like that’s The One That Proves Their Point.