Never drove a police car home
Neighbors never saw him in uniform (7 yrs)
No-one he talked to ever knew he was a police officer. Including his immediate neighbors.
The club was a known laundry
Ownership sketchy
Floyd/Chauvin worked together (years)
Floyd tried using counterfeit $
Club owner did not get called by prosecution to testify.
Club owner did not get called by defense to testify.
Club "manager" gave very brief testimony.
Prosecution and defense never mentioned during brief testimony Chauvin/Floyd relationship.
Odd, no?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Just a hunch but it appears the DC enforcers, ie. the DOJ/FBI, are preparing for a larger awakening amid the American people.
From the 30,000 ft level they seem to increasingly fear a grassroot solution to a corrupt DC government. A solution I would call “extreme federalism”
2. The solution to the scale of DC corruption is local and state action using the constitution, specifically the 10th amendment, against the advancing overreach of corrupt DC officials.
3. Extreme federalism is local and state government refusing to comply, or totally ignoring, unconstitutional demands by the federal government.
1. Actual, real-life, Domestic Violent Extremists called Black Lives Matter & Antifa, tried to burn Washington DC in the summer of 2020. Not a single arrest. Not one. Not a single FBI tweet about “help us find those arsonists who attempted to burn St. John’s church”. Nothing.
2. We live in this bizarro world where people debate the hypocrisy of a “dual justice system”, without ever accepting that it is not hypocrisy – it is by design. The double standards are a feature, not a flaw.
3. Instead of arrests in the summer of 2020 the FBI did this.... No kidding.... Literally, this was their response to BLM and Antifa rioting in DC:
1. Here's the problem.. You cannot currently investigate the Intelligence Community (Church 2.0) in the same way as history because the Senate (SSCI) is working in coordination with THAT exact corrupt intel system.
The *check* in the system is facilitating the intel corruption.
2. I can give you examples, actual empirical examples, of how this is currently constructed.
The Senate Intel Committee (SSCI) is working hand in glove with the agencies they are supposed to oversee.
The executive branch knows this, and is part of the issue.
3. That's why the DOJ has recently announced they will not permit any investigation of members of the intel committee for leaks (ie. compromises in national security).
1. OK, this is remarkable spin... Supernova level off-the-charts spin. And the NYT is counting on 99% of the population not knowing the full background of what was happening in the DOJ in 2018
"the Justice Department had subpoenaed information about an account that belonged to him in February 2018, and that the government barred the company from telling him at the time"...
3. The Weissmann-Mueller special counsel was at it's apex in February 2018. *AND* they were conducting very specific operations at the time.
Everything in Feb thru July 2018 was about protecting themselves by using the special counsel to cover-up the FBI political spying.
*Election systems connected to Inet
*Evidence of anonymous breaches of those systems.
*Private data networks breached/hacked
*Frequency of cyber hacks in proportion to audit(s) progress.
*Hacking ++
*Feds blaming Russia etc
*All this right after DHS announcement
My suspicious cat instinct now leans toward the U.S. intel community releasing the virus in Wuhan intentionally, knowing it would travel to the U.S. and give them plausible deniability.
Why else would the Pentagon give China the keys to a biological weapon?
2. Eleven Days before leaving office President Obama’s administration re-authorized funding for the creation of biological weapons using SARS viruses.
3. However, essentially this re-authorization was only kickstarting funding within the U.S. because the funding of weaponization of SARS-CoV-2 never actually stopped in 2014. The media reporting on this is misleading, if not downright false.