US intelligence should really release what they know and put to bed all the confusion once and for all.

Were there WIV staffers sick with Covid symptoms in Nov 2019? Did one of their wives die? Or is this intelligence not solid?
bloomberg.com/news/features/…
Dr Anderson was a visiting foreign scientist at WIV up to Nov 2019.

But we have this from @evadou @washingtonpost
"[WIV] records mention protocols for disclosing information to foreigners and the sealing of some research reports for up to two decades."
washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pac…
How many people in total worked at the WIV?

"there is a procedure for reporting symptoms that correspond with the pathogens handled in high-risk containment labs"

But what about BSL2 (not high-risk containment) at which the live SARSrCoV work was performed?
This strange assertion that scientists or virologists in particular are gossipy folk keeps appearing.

But @evadou reported that WIV had "regular confidentiality training sessions" and “confidentiality management when hosting foreigners”.

***when hosting foreigners***
I love gossip, but if I had to sign pledges on the regular about not sharing embarrassing or confidential info with foreigners, I would be very careful.
For example, what's the most salacious gossip anyone outside China has heard from a WIV virologist about the WIV? Any examples?
Gossip aside, I'd like to ask @TheLancet to please explain their process of identifying and resolving conflicts of interest.

I don't understand why you appointed not just Daszak but also Anderson to your Covid-19 origins taskforce if they have such close relationships with WIV.
Furthermore, ~half of the experts on your #OriginsOfCovid task force signed the infamous @TheLancet letter condemning "conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin".

How will they objectively investigate a conspiracy theory?
thelancet.com/journals/lance…
@TheLancet "Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumours, and prejudice that jeopardise our global collaboration in the fight against this virus."

"Stand with our colleagues on the frontline!"
Dr Anderson also co-authored this withdrawn preprint, originally posted August 2020. Before it was withdrawn in March 2021, it had been cited by the China-WHO joint study & other Chinese scientists as evidence for frozen food #PopsicleOrigins of Covid-19.

biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Circling back to the idea that no one at WIV was sick in late 2019 during flu season #NeverSick

At an institute with ~1000 personnel, how can no one be sick? I think back to early 2020, many people I know were sick. Pre-covid, it was very normal for sick people to come to work.
This point has been raised by many people, including in the recent @nytimes article: “Zero infection” would mean not a single case among the hundreds of people at the institute, even though a study found that 4.4% of the Wuhan population had been infected.
nytimes.com/2021/06/25/opi…
Does this mean that somehow working at the WIV had the miraculous power of protecting its workers from covid-19 in the middle of an outbreak where they had not known that the virus could by spread by pre-symptomatic victims?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alina Chan

Alina Chan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ayjchan

29 Jun
Timely article by @Schwartzesque on risky pathogen research.

I think the point that almost everyone can agree on is that the current framework+process for assessing potential pandemic pathogen work has to be completely revamped.
businessinsider.com/covid-pandemic…
@Schwartzesque This scientific commentary @T_Inglesby @mlipsitch was published 22 Jan 2020:

"this framework and its implementation should become transparent.. robustly pursue international engagement"

That same day we heard that Wuhan was going to be sealed 封城
journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mS…
Now that more scientists are becoming able to process that Covid-19 might've (regardless of how likely) emerged due to research activities, it's time to transparently create a new set of functional review processes with non-scientist and international stakeholders.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun
To the people on twitter mad that @antonioregalado wrote a profile of me: I'm not asking anyone to do profiles of me. People around me consistently advise me not to agree to interviews and especially profiles because you have no idea what journalists are going to quote/write.
Journalists don't show you the piece before it is published. You can't tell them what to write or how to frame your quotes. I've gotten in trouble again & again.

Even up to the day before the profile was published, I was still worried that I would be portrayed as a conspiracist.
Thankfully that didn't happen. @antonioregalado was objective. He didn't let me get away with anything in the interrogation & got lots of quotes from scientists who disagree with me (scientifically &/or personally). The profile made me think about my missteps & how to do better.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun
This might be the most extensive article written in support of natural origins of Covid-19 that I've seen. I think this was an incredibly well-written piece @factcheckdotorg @jjmcdona with well-rounded quotes from respected experts in the field.
factcheck.org/2021/06/sciche…
@factcheckdotorg @jjmcdona If I can summarize the top 3 points for natural origins, it would be these, according to the article and interviews with experts:

(1) There is no direct evidence of a lab accident or SARS2 having existed in a lab. Instead, we have observed SARS2-like viruses in nature.
(2) An early cluster of Covid-19 in Wuhan was based at a live animal market. The vendors might’ve hidden their illegal animals when they heard there was an outbreak. China has not tested enough animals to find the animal source of the outbreak.
Read 14 tweets
26 Jun
So... @LastWeekTonight @iamjohnoliver

@washingtonpost has been covering #LabLeak since Nov

@colbertlateshow @StephenAtHome @jonstewart talked about the novel coronavirus having the same name as the Wuhan institute (first name & last name)

@nytimes broke today

You up? 🧪🧪👩‍🔬
@LastWeekTonight @iamjohnoliver @washingtonpost @colbertlateshow @StephenAtHome @jonstewart @nytimes I have just been informed that the proper way of doing this is:

U up?
.@LastWeekTonight covered the growing risk of a natural pandemic this Feb.

It would be great if a future episode informs the public of the 21st century risk of a lab-based pandemic.

A pandemic in 1977 was lab-based. SARS classic leaked 6 times from labs.
Read 8 tweets
25 Jun
Thank you very much @antonioregalado for thinking I was worthy of a profile in @techreview for my work on #OriginsOfCovid

And @rowanjacobsen and @BostonMagazine who thought so back in June 2020.

bostonmagazine.com/news/2020/09/0…
technologyreview.com/2021/06/25/102…
@antonioregalado @techreview @rowanjacobsen @BostonMagazine This question from @antonioregalado is worth thinking about for people on both sides of the issue.

"I asked Chan how she would feel if the virus did prove to have emerged naturally..."

How would people (especially scientists) feel if the virus proves to have come from a lab?
@antonioregalado @techreview @rowanjacobsen @BostonMagazine I said “I have days where I think this could be natural. And if it’s natural, then I’ve done a terrible thing because I’ve put a lot of scientists in a very dangerous spot by saying that they could be the source of an accident that resulted in millions of people dying.”
Read 4 tweets
25 Jun
This ⁦@nytimes⁩ piece by ⁦@zeynep⁩ should break whatever is left of the dam on the lab origin hypothesis.

Thank you for correcting many of the public misunderstandings surrounding this issue. nytimes.com/2021/06/25/opi…
Last month, top scientists came together to publish a letter in a top scientific journal calling for a credible investigation into both natural and lab origin hypotheses.

science.sciencemag.org/content/372/65…
Shortly after, @POTUS asked the Intelligence Community to redouble their efforts in collecting and analyzing information that could bring us closer to a conclusion, distinguishing between natural vs lab origins. Their report is due in August.

whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(