Progressivism is deterritorialized idolatry. It instinctively attacks any firm ground. We see its limitations lately in two attack vectors that seem to lack purchase.
Firstly, progressive zeal is attempting to attack family formation (traditional, pre-1945 family formation) by doing what it does and attempting to iterate the locus into something untenable.
We see this very clearly in what could be described as "moving goalposts." These arguments occur every time one engages a progressive actor on age of consent or marriage.
Secondly, they are trying to find angles of attack on the frogs, who are (loosely) defined as a bunch of high quality young men.
They do this through infiltration action (popular zoomer face, "edgy" philosofarts, enthusiastic "female" and "brown" wignattery, etc), and their goal is to reduce frogs to low status.
They hit their limit here, however, because "cool" cannot be fabricated by losers and they can't recruit interesting or creative lackeys anymore thanks to progressive "representation" dogma, etc.
They are A/B testing these angles still, so don't let down your guard. Notice they no longer post "dox" pictures for frog leaders because they got mogged.
If there is something of value, they will try to destroy it, but they cannot destroy reality so they try to work around it. Be of good aesthetic, cheer, and disposition, and never concede an inch to the wreckers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
