During my #ISTELive session today on Being Anti-Racist in Tech, there was someone that mentioned they do not think that Katherine Johnson (from Hidden Figures and literally helped to put us on the moon) and Isaac Newton are on the same level.
I've got time, so let's discuss.
1/
I'd like to begin by asking you *how* many of you knew about Katherine Johnson before Hidden Figures came out.
Being a Black woman myself and having parents who are *very* pro-Black, I didn't even know until I saw the movie, and I'd wager many of you are in the same place.
2/
There's a reason why: it's because, traditionally, people of color and marginalized communities have seldom been celebrated alongside their white or white-passing counterparts aside for special months (i.e. Black History Month).
SO.
This leads us to the comment today.
3/
What exactly is the intent or purpose of stating that you don't think that Katherine Johnson is on the same level as Isaac Newton?
What is the reason?
Because, to me, this distracts from the real reason of the presentation, which was Being Anti-Racist in Tech.
4/
When @MarilaXicana and I created this session, it was about raising awareness on technology platforms and people of color who are doing THE WORK in edtech. Not pitting people against each other.
We can celebrate Isaac Newton while praising Katherine Johnson. We can do BOTH.
5/
Can it be argued that Katherine Johnson needed Isaac Newton's math contributions to help her do her work? Yes.
Does it diminish the work that Katherine Johnson did? No.
She helped to put us on the moon, y'all.
The moon.
6/
And I say this because, especially as many of us enter conference spaces, please make sure you comment and ask questions with intent that are PERTINENT to the topic at hand and do not try to distract from what the speaker is saying.
7/
My moderator, as well as many other participants, shut it down immediately to the point that I honestly did not notice until I was done with the session and it had stopped recording. I am forever grateful for them.
But they shouldn't have had to do that.
8/
If you enter a session literally called "Being Anti-Racist with Tech," then expect for me to talk about...
...anti-racism...
...and people of color who have not normally been acknowledged...
...and communities that have worked hard and deserve recognition...
9/
...because that's why we're here.
Try to distract all you want, but we're STILL here.
This work is important. I know this work is important.
And also, you can do both. You can respect one thing while acknowledging and celebrating another.
10/
So whoever made those comments, I hope you learned something from the session today.
And even if you didn't learn anything now, I hope you are able to reflect on it later.
Because we're still here.
11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've got a free minute and I got several questions regarding my implementation of @iste standards at my school. This has literally been MONTHS of progress and since I've received inquiries, I want to share!
Leadership wanted to implement ISTE wasn't exactly sure where to begin, so I created this plan.
First, you'll notice that not all standards are being implemented at once. Because, honestly, that's a LOT to take on. We are focusing on three standards per three cohorts.
2/
I specifically chose standards we're already DOING, but could also do BETTER. I don't want this to be an additional burden on educators/students/staff after an already wild year given the pandemic and hybrid learning.
Speaking of, we'll be starting implementation NEXT year.
3/
I think it’s time to talk about what I refer to as an “equity bully.”
An “equity bully” is someone who presents themselves as someone who promotes equity, but once you get to know them they are *actually* promoting their own inequitable and bizarre agenda(s).
1/
I’ll begin by saying equity is not something we should have to promote at all. It’s something we should embody. It’s something we should all be working toward.
However, that doesn’t happen for some folks and instead they constantly bring equity up in an inauthentic way.
2/
Example:
A school wants to create a rewards program for student attendance. Someone hops in the conversation and claims it’s an equity issue (because it is). School asks what they should do instead, person suggests they have a *different* rewards program for grades.
3/
Since this got some attention yesterday, here’s what happened (this will be a thread).
The man was trying to backtrack on this statement. She kept pressing on what exactly he meant when he said he hates working with females, and what the “like you” piece at the end meant. 1/
It’s important to note that my wife is one of the ONLY Black women in her very white male dominated circles.
After his backtracking, she said: “You’re not giving me the truth. You’re giving me nonsense. I need the truth. Give me the truth. You are being dishonest with me.” 2/
More backtracking and stonewalling from the man. Lots of “well, I didn’t mean it THAT way” from his side.
Then this fun interaction happened:
Kourt: You are being sexist right now.
Man: I don’t see how this is sexist. I was speaking from my feelings.
3/
I’m curious as to what the rationale is for hiring this person to write an op ed for your website. Not only is she openly attacking a fellow educator, but calling social justice “crap” is alarming alongside your Black voices statements.
Thoughts/comments?
Oh, we are absolutely about to have some paired texts. I’ve GOT time and I hope I make you proud, @JennBinis. And also @jennthetutor because you have perfected the art of the drag.
Let’s start here: if I go on @educationweek’s Twitter account, I find this.
And yet you deliberately publish this, an article in which a white mom is complaining about the lack of white comfort in her son’s classroom. The entire article reads like a “woe is me, I’m not being centered!” piece.