During my #ISTELive session today on Being Anti-Racist in Tech, there was someone that mentioned they do not think that Katherine Johnson (from Hidden Figures and literally helped to put us on the moon) and Isaac Newton are on the same level.

I've got time, so let's discuss.

1/
I'd like to begin by asking you *how* many of you knew about Katherine Johnson before Hidden Figures came out.

Being a Black woman myself and having parents who are *very* pro-Black, I didn't even know until I saw the movie, and I'd wager many of you are in the same place.

2/
There's a reason why: it's because, traditionally, people of color and marginalized communities have seldom been celebrated alongside their white or white-passing counterparts aside for special months (i.e. Black History Month).

SO.

This leads us to the comment today.

3/
What exactly is the intent or purpose of stating that you don't think that Katherine Johnson is on the same level as Isaac Newton?

What is the reason?

Because, to me, this distracts from the real reason of the presentation, which was Being Anti-Racist in Tech.

4/
When @MarilaXicana and I created this session, it was about raising awareness on technology platforms and people of color who are doing THE WORK in edtech. Not pitting people against each other.

We can celebrate Isaac Newton while praising Katherine Johnson. We can do BOTH.

5/
Can it be argued that Katherine Johnson needed Isaac Newton's math contributions to help her do her work? Yes.

Does it diminish the work that Katherine Johnson did? No.

She helped to put us on the moon, y'all.

The moon.

6/
And I say this because, especially as many of us enter conference spaces, please make sure you comment and ask questions with intent that are PERTINENT to the topic at hand and do not try to distract from what the speaker is saying.

7/
My moderator, as well as many other participants, shut it down immediately to the point that I honestly did not notice until I was done with the session and it had stopped recording. I am forever grateful for them.

But they shouldn't have had to do that.

8/
If you enter a session literally called "Being Anti-Racist with Tech," then expect for me to talk about...

...anti-racism...

...and people of color who have not normally been acknowledged...

...and communities that have worked hard and deserve recognition...

9/
...because that's why we're here.

Try to distract all you want, but we're STILL here.

This work is important. I know this work is important.

And also, you can do both. You can respect one thing while acknowledging and celebrating another.

10/
So whoever made those comments, I hope you learned something from the session today.

And even if you didn't learn anything now, I hope you are able to reflect on it later.

Because we're still here.

11/11

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Victoria Thompson, M.S. 🏳️‍🌈

Victoria Thompson, M.S. 🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VictoriaTheTech

26 Jun
This heat wave is messing with my ability to do pretty much anything so here’s a rambling thread of useless facts I know.

1.) After The Lion King was released, the Disney company was sued by a hyena biologist claiming that the movie painted hyenas in a negative light.

1/
2.) Richard Gere’s middle name is Tiffany.

3.) The opposite sides of a die will always add up to seven (and this makes for some GREAT math challenges).

4.) The plastic thingies on the end of shoelaces are called aglets.

2/
5.) All the babies in the original Rugrats are voiced by women.

6.) One of the women, Christine Cavanaugh (one of my FAVE voice actresses), also voiced Dexter in Dexter’s Laboratory.

7.) And E.G. Daily, voice of Tommy Pickles, once recorded the show when she was in labor!

3/
Read 6 tweets
17 May
I've got a free minute and I got several questions regarding my implementation of @iste standards at my school. This has literally been MONTHS of progress and since I've received inquiries, I want to share!

To begin, here is the document I created: docs.google.com/document/d/1L2…

1/
Leadership wanted to implement ISTE wasn't exactly sure where to begin, so I created this plan.

First, you'll notice that not all standards are being implemented at once. Because, honestly, that's a LOT to take on. We are focusing on three standards per three cohorts.

2/
I specifically chose standards we're already DOING, but could also do BETTER. I don't want this to be an additional burden on educators/students/staff after an already wild year given the pandemic and hybrid learning.

Speaking of, we'll be starting implementation NEXT year.

3/
Read 6 tweets
24 Mar
I think it’s time to talk about what I refer to as an “equity bully.”

An “equity bully” is someone who presents themselves as someone who promotes equity, but once you get to know them they are *actually* promoting their own inequitable and bizarre agenda(s).

1/
I’ll begin by saying equity is not something we should have to promote at all. It’s something we should embody. It’s something we should all be working toward.

However, that doesn’t happen for some folks and instead they constantly bring equity up in an inauthentic way.

2/
Example:

A school wants to create a rewards program for student attendance. Someone hops in the conversation and claims it’s an equity issue (because it is). School asks what they should do instead, person suggests they have a *different* rewards program for grades.

3/
Read 9 tweets
15 Oct 20
Since this got some attention yesterday, here’s what happened (this will be a thread).

The man was trying to backtrack on this statement. She kept pressing on what exactly he meant when he said he hates working with females, and what the “like you” piece at the end meant. 1/
It’s important to note that my wife is one of the ONLY Black women in her very white male dominated circles.

After his backtracking, she said: “You’re not giving me the truth. You’re giving me nonsense. I need the truth. Give me the truth. You are being dishonest with me.” 2/
More backtracking and stonewalling from the man. Lots of “well, I didn’t mean it THAT way” from his side.

Then this fun interaction happened:

Kourt: You are being sexist right now.

Man: I don’t see how this is sexist. I was speaking from my feelings.

3/
Read 7 tweets
11 Sep 20
Hey @educationweek:

I’m curious as to what the rationale is for hiring this person to write an op ed for your website. Not only is she openly attacking a fellow educator, but calling social justice “crap” is alarming alongside your Black voices statements.

Thoughts/comments?
Oh, we are absolutely about to have some paired texts. I’ve GOT time and I hope I make you proud, @JennBinis. And also @jennthetutor because you have perfected the art of the drag.

Let’s start here: if I go on @educationweek’s Twitter account, I find this.
And yet you deliberately publish this, an article in which a white mom is complaining about the lack of white comfort in her son’s classroom. The entire article reads like a “woe is me, I’m not being centered!” piece.

You chose to publish it because...?
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(