The Sunk Costs Fallacy is a key principle of statist growth. The Left is constantly grabbing piles of money, blowing it on useless or counterproductive programs - and then insisting we can never abandon the "investments" they made on our behalf, so we must keep spending.
Every dollar statists can seize from free people becomes a flag planted on the next hill they plan to conquer. They insist we must be "progressive" and can never "go back," because that would be an unconscionable waste of all the money they've already spent.
Economists call this a fallacy, an irrational and destructive tendency to keep pouring money into failed endeavors because we fear to "waste" or "lose" what we've already spent. In statist politics, it's not a fallacy - it's a key tactic, indeed a core principle.
Statists make sure to hire as many government workers as they can with the money they grab, so when critics call for spending reductions or seek to abolish wasteful programs, the statists can howl about all the government jobs that would be lost. Thrift is denounced as cruelty.
Of course, progressives invariably define "progress" as the growth of the State. Nothing that makes the State smaller, or the people richer and freer, can ever be "progressive." Any attempt to escape from the Sunk Costs Fallacy becomes "regressive" or "turning back the clock."
This dovetails with the Left's wanton destruction of cost-benefit analysis. They seek to render the public incapable of asking whether the benefits of any government action are worth the cost, especially marginal benefits achieved at staggering expense.
That's how the Left keeps planting their Sunk Costs flag of conquest deep into the territories of freedom. You're not supposed to ask if the cost of their plans is worth the purported benefits - or question their (always wrong!) estimates of the cost and benefits.
Any "benefit" from the growth of the State is worth any cost in the Left's eyes. "If it saves just one life, we must..." is a characteristic mantra. They insist that even questioning the cost of a noble left-wing goal is evil. It's one of the reasons they hate capitalism so much.
Of course, they never tell the public their plans are irrevocable no matter how badly they fail. They never explain that you'll never be allowed to vote against their schemes again, never be permitted to re-evaluate or change your mind, never allowed to regain your freedom.
As soon as even the most crackpot left-wing program gets off the ground - even if it's immediately exposed as foolish, corrupt, counterproductive - it's permanent. The costs are sunk, the flag is planted, and if you try to shut it down, you must hate whoever purportedly benefits.
In so many ways, statist politics are the twisted mirror image of economics. The core principles of politics are the acknowledged fallacies of economics. Politics is a promise to transcend logic, common sense, and basic economics through state force and collective will. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

30 Jun
The quest for Big, Clean Government is utterly futile, and most people who promise it know it's impossible. Corruption is written into the DNA of Big Government, including authoritarian and totalitarian systems. Only small governments can be clean, and even then it's tough.
One of the biggest lies of authoritarianism is that it can provide Big, Clean Government at last. Authoritarians often gain power by criticizing the corruption of democratic Big Government and blaming it all on the private sector. Honest government requires less freedom!
Authoritarians promise that if government becomes a stern religion, and working for the State becomes an act of religious devotion, then corruption will be vanquished at last. Only a selfless overclass of born-and-bred bureaucrats can properly serve the people.
Read 11 tweets
25 Jun
Your Green New Deal future: fantastically expensive electric cars the middle class can't afford, subsidized by taxes the middle class is forced to pay - but even rich people can't use them all the time because the junk "green power grid" can't handle charging them.
I absolutely guarantee you this ends with confused six-figure-income folks standing next to inert electric cars that cost five times as much as Honda Civics used to, while their political overlords cruise by in reliable gas-powered vehicles that are now forbidden to the masses.
Electric cars just never made sense as anything but an expensive indulgence for virtue-signalers with loads of disposable income - and even then, they survive only by looting taxpayers for huge subsidies. It's just logistically impossible for them to "replace" gas cars.
Read 12 tweets
24 Jun
The grassroots rebellion against Critical Race Theory must be the beginning of a movement, not its culmination. It's not enough to pressure a corrupt system into grudgingly withdrawing its latest attempt at twisted left-wing ideological indoctrination. Go after the system itself.
Parents need to understand they cannot win an endless war of attrition against the corrupt teachers unions and left-wing academia. They pump garbage into your kids for years; you finally realize what's going on and fight for a whole election cycle to stop them; they start again.
CRT is just repackaged Marxist theory. It's already been repackaged more often than a stale fruitcake re-gifted for seven Christmases in a row. Win the war against CRT and they'll just try again. They're probably already working on the next iteration.
Read 8 tweets
23 Jun
Democrats haven't changed their minds about Voter ID. They're just grudgingly admitting that they haven't been able to trick or intimidate the American people out of supporting it. Tactics are shifting, but the goal of rigging elections forever remains.
Dems console themselves with the knowledge that Voter ID is another government program they can subvert, another bureaucracy they'll be able to capture and corrupt over time. They'll grudgingly, bitterly give a little ground on Voter ID to get other concessions they want.
The original plan to replace the American electorate through mass migration is still very much in play and picking up steam. Voter ID won't matter much, once the migrant waves are legalized or some farcical "voter ID for undocumented Americans" is cooked up.
Read 7 tweets
21 Jun
If the Western world meant what it says about press freedom, Beijing would be warned that no Chinese government publication or social media account in the free world would survive one day longer than Apple Daily in Hong Kong.
It's long past time to get serious about information warfare with the Chinese Communist Party. It is absolutely absurd to let any Chinese official use any social media platform that is forbidden to Chinese citizens. Shut them all down, along with every CCP bot network.
Let Beijing know that if Apple Daily is choked out of existence for supposedly "colluding" with foreign governments - by talking to them and quoting Western politicians - then every CCP publication will be held to the same standard and summarily destroyed.
Read 10 tweets
18 Jun
The thing about the Ashli Babbitt case is that we just spent the past year, and much of the previous decade, establishing that cops are not automatically justified in using lethal force against someone committing a crime - not even if they resist arrest or attack the cops.
There is a vast disconnect between the white-hot debate over police use of force in 2020, and post-Ferguson, and shrugging off Babbitt's death with "eh, she was involved in a riot, clean shoot, we don't even have to know who shot her or exactly why."
Before Jan. 6, we left off our Great National Debate on the use of force with the Abolish the Police Party insisting it scarcely matters what a suspect was doing when the police used force against them. The biography of the suspect and records of the cops are more important.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(