Thread by @PerpetualValue

I'm disgusted today.

In Holland @Gezondheidsraad opens up the experimental 'vaccine' for the age 12-17.

Reasons:
- reduce spread (false assumption, no proof)
- reduce chance of lockdown (Government's fault, not the 'virus')
- no more testing (dito)
- not be 2nd grade citizen

Zero individual medical reasons are given.
There's also no room for ethics at all.
Let's check qcovid.org/Calculation
It doesn't go under 19, so I take an age of 19 w/o comorbidities for this example.
Risk of hospital admission: 0,0023%.
So this is even smaller for age 12-18.

Kids have very little to fear of C19.
While they have to fear for the experimental gene therapy without known LT risks.
In Israel myocarditis was found in 1 of 3,000-6,000 young men
That is already much higher than the risk of C19.
This is a serious issue

sciencemag.org/news/2021/06/i…

Then there are many other side-effects of the 'vaccine' too.
The vaccine proponents always make huge errors in making the cost-benefit analysis:
- They only look to one side-effect (e.g. blood clots) instead of cumulative
- They don't mention annual vaccination rounds

Let's look at the Pfizer Research report.
Of course, the dodgy part is hidden in the appendix.

8 adolescents out of 1131 (0,7%) of 12-15 years old had severe or life-threatening events

nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NE…

That is besides the 'normal side-effects'
'That's because it's working'
And without knowing the Long Term risk of creating Spike Protein factories in your body.

Observed risk increase at myocarditis because of the experimental gene therapy:
12-17: ~100x
18-24: ~50x
25-29: ~15x
30-39: ~8x

This is way under the real risk increase because of the underreporting of VAERS

cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/…

CDC Presentation, after the 2nd shot:
>25% was unable to do normal daily activities after the 2nd Dose.
0,7% required medical care.
0,2% required EMERGENCY medical care
This is EXCLUDING the side-effects of the 1st shot

cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/…

0,7% chance to face a severe or life-threatening event because of the vaccine
vs
<0,0023% chance of hospitalisation risk of C19

What am I missing here?

Then to the ridiculous claims of @Gezondheidsraad

1) reduce spread.

Show me proof! WHO says there's is no substantive data for this.

who.int/news-room/feat…

UK shows this assumption is false:
88% of Delta cases in vaccinated people

https://twitter.com/PerpetualValue/status/1408458185787248644

Also Israel shows this assumption is false.
"About half of adults infected in an outbreak of the Delta variant of Covid-19 in Israel were fully inoculated with the Pfizer Inc. vaccine"

wsj.com/articles/vacci…

2) reduce chance of lockdown and thus to have face to face school contact.
Uuuuhh? That seems caused by the Government not the 'virus'.
Sweden seems to be doing fine with real life classes.

3) to have no testing.
We should never test healthy people, problem solved.

4) Newspaper @volkskrant called another reason. Vaccinate the adolescents in order for them NOT to be a 'second-grade citizien'.
How about you don't apply discrimination based on experimental gene therapy that doesn't reduce transmission?

And the disgusting @CDCDirector is just blurting out propaganda to vaccinate children. With false numbers, false assumptions and wrong reasoning.

How much will she be paid?

https://twitter.com/CDCDirector/status/1408116464683569157

I have to admit... I'm cooking today.

This is where it should end.
This is where people can not be allowed not to speak up.
This is where we should draw the line.
This is where we should stand our ground.
This is where the parental responsibility needs to awaken.
Do it for the children!
It's now or never.

This is throwing kids in front of the bus in order to TRY (emphasis on TRY) to save mostly 80+year olds with underlying comorbidities.
Remaining life-expectancy adolescents: 60-80 years
Remaining life-expectancy majority C19 victims: 0-6 years.

It's a mad world.