Hi, @GOPLeader

Not this again. Sigh.

Right,⤵️ but today they'd be Republicans.

I think you could use a refresher on the history of the parties. I can recommend a few books, including @HC_Richardson's To Make Men Free (I'll put the covers in the next tweet.)

1/
How Lincoln’s anti-slavery, strong federal government pro-industry party morphed into the party of the Proud Boys is a little complicated, but I'll break it down.

Unless otherwise indicated, all facts taken from these books ⤵️

Ready, @GOPLeader?

2/
During the Civil War, the Democratic Party was the pro-slavery party of the Confederacy & rural America.

In other words, these guys⤵️would have been Democrats.

Spoiler: Now they're Republicans.

3/
The Democrats wanted a limited federal government because they knew the North, if given the chance, would end slavery.

Democrats vetoed federal funds for canals and highways because they understood such infrastructure would help the industrialized north.

4/
Before the Civil War, Democrats had disproportionate control over the federal government. (Sort of like the Republicans now.)

They had advantages in the electoral college (which favors rural states) & the 3/5 rule gave slaveowners disproportionate power in Congress.

5/
The courts were packed with pro-slavery judges.

In 1855 the Republican Party, the “Freedom Party,” was born as an anti-slavery, pro-industry, pro-federal government party.

Republicans wanted a strong federal government because industry needed roads, canals, etc. to thrive.

6/
For that, the Republicans needed federal legislation.

Republicans gave us our first income tax.

After the Civil War and the crushing defeat of the South, the Republicans had the power to pass pro-industry legislation.

As a result, the industrial revolution boomed.

7/
Notice: When slaveowners had power, they voted to consolidate their power.

After the Civil War, industrialists did the same.

Sometimes (not always) people in power do that.

8/
States began segregating blacks & making it harder for them to vote (helped by the KKK)

From Paxton ⤵️ The world’s first fascist group was the KKK.

The Republican Party split into two factions: The conservative pro-industry part and the liberal pro-labor part.

9/
In 1896, when SCOTUS upheld segregation and voter restrictions, the GOP dropped racial equality and labor issues from its platform and became the conservative party.

By 1920, the Democratic Party base consisted of Southern whites, rural America, and white laborers.

10/
Neither party championed racial equality: which ushered in a long period of relative harmony between the parties—they respected each other’s “differences” because they weren’t that different!

Both parties were basically ruled by white men.

11/
In 1920, Harding (a Republican) won the presidency & immediately deregulated business and repealed taxes. More money poured into the hands of the wealthy. Banks freely lent too much money.

The gap between the wealthy and laborers widened more.

Laborers had no protection.

12/
Then, in 1929, the market crashed & the Depression hit.

Mostly, Republicans thought the best solution was to do nothing on the grounds that government control was socialist and anti-American.

13/
Democratic FDR promised a New Deal: Protective legislation for laborers.

He drew blacks into the Democratic coalition, who liked his pro-labor stance.

FDR gave us social security, worker protections, etc, and regulations to keep businesses from cheating (they hated that).

14/
The GOP fought against the New Deal, calling it socialism and a welfare state.

White evangelicals also opposed government assistance: They didn’t want to elevate government over the church.

15/
In 1954, SCOTUS, in Brown v. Board of Education declared racial segregation in schools unconstitutional.

Resistance came mostly from the South. They used the same rationale that underlay the Confederacy: these things should be left to the states; it was federal overreach.

16/
After the Democrats embraced Civil Rights in the 1960s, the GOP devised a way to expand their base by bringing the KKK types into the Republican Party.

It was called the Southern Strategy.

That's why this guy⤵️ is a Republican now.

So the parties turned 180 degrees.

17/
I mean, really: What on earth does Donald Trump have in common with Honest Abe?

The parties have switched platforms, which is why the Democrats want to take down statues of Confederates and Republicans want to leave them up.

See?

18/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

1 Jul
Weisselberg was "one of the largest individual beneficiaries" of the criminal scheme.

So there were others.
He wasn't even necessarily the largest beneficiary.

Today, those others are probably having a Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day. Image
I should do this as a thread.

This is important: The scheme is systematic and ongoing. In other words, we're not talking about a few isolated incidents, but pervasive over a period of years.

This is my surprised face. [sarcasm] Image
The defendants "and others."

The scheme was to compensate Weisselberg "and other Trump organization executives. . . " off the books.

It's hard to believe those others get to skate free. There's just too much noise in here about them. Image
Read 11 tweets
28 Jun
I wonder what would happen if, across the nation, people started holding signs in front of Toyota dealerships and handing out leaflets about why money spent on Toyota funds insurrections.

🤔
This would be most effective, of course, in blue or blue-leaning areas where sales could immediately drop off.

Tax cuts from the Trump party are appealing, but without sales, tax cuts do no good.

And ⤵️
What democracy needs right now are community organizers.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun
I finished reading NYU prof. @ruthbenghiat’s book Strongmen: From Mussolini to the Present.

I’m ready with a Twitter Book report, which I combined with this week’s video.

I'll also talk about how to weaken the Trump-Fox-Republican cult.


1/
[Edited] transcription here: terikanefield.com/how-to-weaken-…

I’ll also do a Twitter summary.

The book is detailed and complete and there’s no way to do it justice in a Twitter thread, but (after I fill my ☕️) I'll try to hit a few main points.
Ben-Ghiat, a historian, tells the stories of an impressive list of strongmen👇 Patterns emerge.

🔹They all use their public office to enrich themselves.
🔹Most come to power with a history of lawbreaking.
🔹They act like gangsters.
🔹They encourage violence.
Read 26 tweets
25 Jun
As the future looks bleaker for the Republicans as a minority party, they will get crazier and more extreme.

It comes from panic and desperation.
One way to see the evolution of the Republican Party is that what was once the right wing fringe has now taken over the party, and moderates are leaving.

The analysis, though, can do deeper . . .
Another way to see this is what @dziblatt calls the conservative dilemma, which is this:

Conservatives tend to represent the wealth and powerful corporations, therefore the policies they advocate are not appealing to the majority of people.

So how do they win elections?
Read 10 tweets
24 Jun
Rudy Giuliani's disbarment is an "interim suspension." Here's what that means⤵️

Elsewhere the court notes that the evidence of Guiliani's lies is "uncontroverted."
Also, just because it was interim doesn't mean Giuliani didn't have a chance to present defense and evidence.

He offered two very lame defenses which the court made short work of.

First, he said he had a First Amendment right to say everything he said.
The court said NOPE.

You wanna lie? Give up your license. Lawyers as officers of the court are governed by special rules. Don't like it? Don't be a lawyer.

He also offered the "I didn't know I was lying" defense.

Yeah, riiiiight, said the court . . .
Read 5 tweets
23 Jun
From elections law prof. @rickhasen

In March he warned that the elections law reform bill was being wrongly portrayed as the only way to save democracy.

What happened is that some people took that literally and felt genuine panic when it failed.

washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/0… Image
Yes.

I had trouble understanding the genuine panic meltdown last night. It seemed clear to me (this is only June 2020) that the vote last night was the start of negotiations.

Not with the Republicans, but within the ranks of the Democratic Party.

The idea that a single vote on a single bill will end democracy is the problem with Twitter, or maybe social media.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(