Weisselberg was "one of the largest individual beneficiaries" of the criminal scheme.
So there were others.
He wasn't even necessarily the largest beneficiary.
Today, those others are probably having a Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day.
I should do this as a thread.
This is important: The scheme is systematic and ongoing. In other words, we're not talking about a few isolated incidents, but pervasive over a period of years.
This is my surprised face. [sarcasm]
The defendants "and others."
The scheme was to compensate Weisselberg "and other Trump organization executives. . . " off the books.
It's hard to believe those others get to skate free. There's just too much noise in here about them.
I mentioned elsewhere that paying employees off the book is a Big Deal.
The scheme allowed everyone to cheat. The Trump Org cheated on payroll taxes, and the executives cheated on their taxes. At the same time, the Trump Org deducted the expenses.
Goodies for everyone!
This spreadsheet thing is almost comic.
Since 2005, Weisselberg lived rent-free (including utilities) in a New York apartment maintained by the Trump Org. Two sets of books (the second set are these spreadsheets) kept track of the cheating.
No way to say it was inadvertent.
Look who signed the off-the-books checks for tax-free (unreported) benefits.
I understand that private tuition in Manhattan for two students is quite expensive.
Apparently living rent-free in Manhattan and free private-school tuition for your kids isn't really complete without a Mercedes paid by the company in and documented in books juggled so nobody pays taxes.
Prison is a small price to pay for years of luxury, right? (sarcasm)
There's been a lot of talk about pressure on Weisselberg to flip. If these "other employees" are not named Trump, I assume they're squirming right now. (#1)
"Other executives" were paid bonuses by subsidiary companies. The bonuses were disguised as self-employed income. (#2)
The problem with tweeting as I read is that the punch-line gets buried.
I hit the "Conspiracy" count and I'm thinking: "Wait. Conspiracy is 2 or more people! Can someone conspire with a corporation or company🤔?"
Then I find an unindicted co-conspirator.
Veeeery interesting.
A total of 15 counts, including frequent mentions of the F-word.
Not THAT f-word.
Fraud.
Will any of the Trumps be indicted? It depends on how well they insulated themselves.
But I will be extremely surprised if more indictments are not coming. There were too many teasers here.
I assume that we'll also see an indictment for bank fraud.
Bank and insurance fraud, in fact, is conspicuously missing.
In his 2018 congressional testimony, Cohen presented financial statements that Trump gave financial institutions misrepresenting the worth of property. theguardian.com/us-news/2019/f…
Michael Cohen, as Trump's former personal lawyer, would have had these records.
Hell hath no fury like a fixer scorned.
If indeed (as is being reported) the unindicted co-conspirator is the comptroller who is cooperating, it seems to me he'd know about as much as Weisselberg.
Sort of an obvious point, but it's easy to see why Trump fought tooth and nail for years to prevent his tax records from coming to light.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Witnesses don't always tell the truth.
Juries don't always believe the witness.
Witnesses who "flip" were usually involved in the criminal scheme, so their testimony can also be suspect.
Documentary evidence is harder to discredit. Witnesses can help connect the dots.
I think you could use a refresher on the history of the parties. I can recommend a few books, including @HC_Richardson's To Make Men Free (I'll put the covers in the next tweet.)
1/
How Lincoln’s anti-slavery, strong federal government pro-industry party morphed into the party of the Proud Boys is a little complicated, but I'll break it down.
Unless otherwise indicated, all facts taken from these books ⤵️
I wonder what would happen if, across the nation, people started holding signs in front of Toyota dealerships and handing out leaflets about why money spent on Toyota funds insurrections.
The book is detailed and complete and there’s no way to do it justice in a Twitter thread, but (after I fill my ☕️) I'll try to hit a few main points.
Ben-Ghiat, a historian, tells the stories of an impressive list of strongmen👇 Patterns emerge.
🔹They all use their public office to enrich themselves.
🔹Most come to power with a history of lawbreaking.
🔹They act like gangsters.
🔹They encourage violence.
One way to see the evolution of the Republican Party is that what was once the right wing fringe has now taken over the party, and moderates are leaving.
Another way to see this is what @dziblatt calls the conservative dilemma, which is this:
Conservatives tend to represent the wealth and powerful corporations, therefore the policies they advocate are not appealing to the majority of people.