@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL The Department of Labor (@USDOL) defines skilled work as work that takes over 30 days to learn (using the Specific Vocational Preparation system to rate jobs), skills are transferrable to other work, and unskilled work takes 30 days or less to learn (occupationalinfo.org/appendxc_1.html).
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL That definition of skilled work is key to understanding vocational rehabilitation, job market, and job placement literature. The degree of preparation before basic mastery of a job is rated by the Specific Vocational Preparation code: 1 and 2 each refer to unskilled work.
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL In 1981, Fast Food Cook was last classified in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (under code 313.374-010) as being skilled work with a Specific Vocational Preparation of 5 (indicating over 6 months up to and including 1 year of training required) (occupationalinfo.org/31/313374010.h…).
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL Fast Food Cook is now classified in O*NET OnLine (under code 35-2011.00) as semi-skilled–to–unskilled work with a Specific Vocational Preparation of below 4 (indicating less than 3 months of training required) (onetonline.org/link/summary/3…) indicating a substantial change in the job.
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL The Occupational Outlook Handbook indicates "[m]ost cooks learn their skills through on-the-job training, usually lasting a few weeks" (bls.gov/ooh/food-prepa…), which starts to sound like the definition of unskilled work (which requires only a month or less of training).
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL The @BLS_gov indicates Fast Food Cooks (under code 35-2011) require "[n]o formal educational credential," no work experience, and only "[s]hort-term on-the-job training" (bls.gov/emp/tables/edu…), which refers to job training of only a month or less (bls.gov/emp/documentat…).
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL @BLS_gov Fast Food Workers have never been skilled work.

Last classified in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles in 1986 under code 311.472-010, Fast Food Workers have a Specific Vocational Preparation of 2 (indicating a month or less of training required) (occupationalinfo.org/31/311472010.h…).
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL @BLS_gov Fast Food Worker is classified in O*NET (under code 35-3023.00) as semi-skilled–to–unskilled work with a Specific Vocational Preparation of below 4 (indicating less than 3 months of training required) (onetonline.org/link/summary/3…), which is consistent with the Dictionary (see above).
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL @BLS_gov The Occupational Outlook Handbook indicates "[w]orkers typically learn through on-the-job training, which may last from few days to several weeks" (bls.gov/ooh/food-prepa…), which sounds like the definition of unskilled work (which requires only a month or less of training).
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL @BLS_gov The @BLS_gov indicates Fast Food Worker (under code 35-3023) require "[n]o formal educational credential," no work experience, and only "[s]hort-term on-the-job training" (bls.gov/emp/tables/edu…), which refers to job training of only a month or less (bls.gov/emp/documentat…).
@sudsbakerysoaps @USDOL @BLS_gov As performed in the fast-food work environment, did it take you, @sudsbakerysoaps, (or any other worker) more than 30 days to learn to stock, wash dishes, handle orders, cook and assemble food products, serve that food, and clean toilet room biohazards?

If so, you must be slow.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Stretton, III, Rosa Ferreum (鐵瑰)

Michael Stretton, III, Rosa Ferreum (鐵瑰) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MSS3RosaFerreum

25 Jun
@QuintusCurtius The draft will not address “how the obesity problem is destroying the population” because many of those who are obese got that way in childhood. “31% of young adults ages 17 to 24 cannot enlist because they're too heavy” (npr.org/sections/healt… | dacowits.defense.gov/Portals/48/Doc…). ImageImage
@QuintusCurtius Moreover, more than 10% of the population will not qualify due to lack of intelligence. “Minimum enlistment standards since World War II have generally been higher than the 10th percentile” (www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfreds…, p. 90).
@QuintusCurtius “[T]he military is prohibited by law… from enlisting recruits below… the 10th percentile… because of the extraordinarily high training costs and high rates of failure among such men during the mobilization of forces in World War II” (www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfreds…, p. 90).
Read 4 tweets
20 Jun
@Oneiorosgrip @SignHexa Regarding historical parental fiscal responsibility, consider "Lagging Behind the Times: Parenthood, Custody, and Gender Bias in the Family Court" by Cynthia McNeely published in 1998 in Volume 25 of the _Florida State University Law Review_ page 891 (ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewconten…).
@Oneiorosgrip @SignHexa "[T]he father [was designated] as the natural protector of children because he had the ability to provide for their financial support. Women were seen as incapable of handling legal or financial matters…." 25 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 891, 897 (1998).
@Oneiorosgrip @SignHexa "Because fathers usually provided the family’s sole income through their employment away from the home [during the Industrial Revolution], this absence advanced the fathers' 'long march from the center to the periphery of domestic life.'" 25 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. at 898 (1998).
Read 58 tweets
20 Jun
@LavAgarwal95 @General_Oluchi Did someone call for data?

Sorry, I was delayed by work. I had many hearings this week and many briefs to write. Apologies.

The article by Payman Taei cited by Lav (@LavAgarwal95) understates the problem.
@LavAgarwal95 @General_Oluchi If you add up both the unpaid labor and paid labor, on average, men work more total time than women creating a #GenderedLaborGap pursuant to (as an example) the @BLS_gov's 2017 American Time Use Survey (bls.gov/news.release/a…) and @pewresearch's data (pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018…).
@LavAgarwal95 @General_Oluchi @BLS_gov @pewresearch According to the @BLS_gov, "[o]n the days they worked, employed men worked 49 minutes more than employed women. … However, even among full-time workers (those usually working 35 hours or more per week), men worked more per day than women—8.4 hours, compared with 7.9 hours."
Read 25 tweets
27 May
@dannycantalk @Oneiorosgrip @Tekla_Too @Firebird_psych @Judith_Char @weathagirl @anti_fembot @ladies4pd @Gaea56998567 Ideologues aren’t “everyone.” Pragmatists are the opposite of ideologues. There’s a spectrum in between. Some folks have all information filtered by ideology rather than life experience and education — that is an ideologue. Merely having principles doesn’t make one an ideologue.
@dannycantalk @Oneiorosgrip @Tekla_Too @Firebird_psych @Judith_Char @weathagirl @anti_fembot @ladies4pd @Gaea56998567 Introducing character judgments in a debate is often in the form of an ad hominem, an insult, or a combination of the two. This isn’t merely “no you” but an observation (acknowledging exceptions) about when people who filter reality through their ideology use such tactics.
@dannycantalk @Oneiorosgrip @Tekla_Too @Firebird_psych @Judith_Char @weathagirl @anti_fembot @ladies4pd @Gaea56998567 You can tell an ideologue from others because their mind can’t change when presented with new information that’s demonstrably reliably gathered. Ideologues can’t change their mind under such circumstances as the information doesn’t exist to them as their ideology filters it out.
Read 5 tweets
23 May
I saw the image posted by @spacetartpop () and I thought I could support that point by citing the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. The trend has been that jobs have gotten more skilled over time, not less, so I thought O*NET would provide further support. Image
Fast Food Cook was last classified in 1981 in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (under code 313.374-010) as skilled work with a Specific Vocational Preparation of 5 (indicating over 6 months up to and including 1 year of training required) (occupationalinfo.org/31/313374010.h…).
Fast Food Cook is now classified in O*NET OnLine (under code 35-2011.00) as semi-skilled–to–unskilled work with a Specific Vocational Preparation of below 4 (indicating less than 3 months of training required) (onetonline.org/link/summary/3…) indicating a substantial change in the job.
Read 9 tweets
23 May
@eminently_me5 @Eminently_Me Where? You have only demonstrated that you have poor reading comprehension. First, you claim the study says that the "vast majority of perps are men and the victims are majority women" (archive.ph/XDGxP), but the study shows the opposite ().
@eminently_me5 @Eminently_Me You then claim that there "some subsets in which it is equal" but that "in the total set, it is primarily men attacking women" (archive.ph/3Jplg), but the study shows the opposite () as indicated in this chart showing all the data analyzed.
@eminently_me5 @Eminently_Me However, the study does show that a lot of women rape women in institutions like prison and jail (both in adult and juvenile populations), which it appears that you are trying to blame on men somehow. 🤣 Your demonstrable lack of reading comprehension is laughable.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(