Below are some links to the people and articles I mentioned in the article.
I’m grateful that @fastcompany continues to be a space for critical reflections such as my long form piece. Suzanne Lebarre is a great editor!
It was a multi-year process for me to turn my years of fieldnotes on HMW into this article. The HMW is used so ubiquitously as part of workshops globally that many unnamed senior leaders in our space warned me of career suicide if I ever spoke publicly about it
I didn't listen to them. I channeled my anger by writing down everytime I saw the HMW used. I have years of notes on every conversation and workshop, and photos of slides with the HMW.
Then I tried to make the HMW better with some of the techniques I shared in the article: WSW (Why Should We) or WAW (Why are We) - this allowed me to gently and safely introduce new ways to undo the harms of HMW short of suggesting we stop HMW entire.
Then my team & I @suddencompass created a new technique that was able to get at the desired outcome of HMW while prioritizing the human insights. We open-sourced that technique with @GoogleDesign: Translating Business Questions to Human Questions designsprintkit.withgoogle.com/methodology/ph…
The lesson is that if you ever notice any technique or approach that isn’t working out at work — DO NOT IGNORE IT. Document the outcomes, write down the negative impact. Every time you have a WTF moment, record it. And then eventually, work on making it better
Many of the people I mentioned in the article have done exactly the same thing - they saw a problem, and then tried to make it better.
They are also making new methods, techniques, and communities. Collaborate w/ them!
1. Work with Jahan Mantin & Boyuan Gao of @ProjectInkblot to adopt their Design for Diversity™ framework
4. Check out architect @bcleejrof who started @colloqate - they do incredible work and have built an amazing community - Design as Protest - join it! colloqate.org/design-justice…
5. @panthealee’s founded @thereboot, read her twitter thread on the issues with “co-creation workshops”
One of my personal goals in writing this article is to get the entire design field leveled up for designing the future of crytpo & blockchain. Let's leapfrog many of the issues we've had with designing Web 2.0. We need design to represent the user voice in this entirely new tech.
DM me if you’re already working in crytpo - I want to connect with you.
And if you’re interested in moving into this space, also ping me !
also one final note - it took me a while to write this article because so many people were afraid to go on record to tell me what they had witnessed with the HMW. I am grateful to all the people who spoke to me on and off record.
You'd think I was writing an article to uncover genocide or some massive embezzlement scheme - no just 3 words.
This fear speaks to something so deeply wrong with our industry--that we put #designthinking & companies that push up on a pedestal
this is why I think @georgeaye's @elizjohansen's investigation into IDEO is so brave. We need to speak up , especially in an industry that purports to be human-centered.
I also just found the amazing @fovlabs from @srukrish who runs a design lab that makes games and simulations for the design of public policy. They actively work to dismantle the mystique and supremacy of #designthinking
@https://twitter.com/fovlabs/status/1407665225403404290?s=20
A hearing happened yesterday that could radically change how we use the internet. Depending on how the Supreme Court rules on Van Buren vs U.S., third-party scraping could become a criminal activity. #scrapingisnotacrime
Scraping of publicly available data makes a more equal & inclusive internet. By blocking third-party scrapers, we would lose monitoring by data journalists, watchdog orgs, and researchers.
Here’s some of the stuff that would disappear due to being labeled criminal activity:
❌ Researcher projects & civil society institutions that monitor big tech uses data like @LauraEdelson2’s NYU Ad Observatory that observes political ad targeting thehill.com/policy/technol…
I found out that my mother is being radicalized by Chinese Wechat & local Chinese American groups in California to either not vote at all or vote for Trump. During this quarantine she has a lot of time at home and she's been seeing a lot of misinfo
Everything she has said is the almost WORD FOR WORD the same things that I have heard other Chinese Americans say in my networks.
Their main issue is that the “next generation” won’t benefit from their hard work and that their children or grandchildren will fall behind if Democrats are in control cuz they’ll implement things like affirmative action & equality measures.
The lack of context in which @CarolYujiaYin’s video of using health codes in China is being shared on twitter & linked to @techreview’s really good social distancing article seems to be creating confusion about how it’s actually being implemented.
My researchers in Wuhan & I (virtually) have been studying how people are using tech during the Quarantine. So here are some notes to clarify how tracking is actually done.
As @CarolYujiaYin said, every city has their health code rating sys. 健康码 for #COVID19 to determine if one is “safe” or not to enter a specific building or area.
BUT it’s WAY more confusing in practice! There are many competing systems w/ their own definition of “safe”.
1. I’m so grateful to @tristanharris@aza being vulnerable enough to suggest a new field to study human + tech. It just goes to show there’s tons of confusion around the role of research & insights in industry - which is the topic of my upcoming talk at @MindtheProduct.
2. @zeynep is right about the willful blindness of industry tech & @BostonJoan have pointed to entire field of STS - BUT i have sympathy for @tristanharris@aza cuz i see tons of confusion on several fronts between industry & academia that can possibly make even well meaning...
3. ... tech folks feel like a new area of study is needed. One of the big problems is how research is manifested in industry under confusing fields of UX, CX, design research -as @lifewinning noted there is def a trend with throwing an X in industry to make a field sound TOUGH