Lol, Renato is not Wjnaldum. Plus you quite overrate tempo play. Having the best tempo controller in the world is not going to be very effective against top teams and PnP wins the midfield. Look at how Barca's midfield with Busquets constantly gets overran. Kante vs City/Real.
Against most smaller teams, as long as the CMs are tidy in possession and can pick a pass (as well as familiar with a system that constantly generates superiorities), you are fine. You don't need Busquets or Toni Kroos to break down all low blocks. You need confident passers.
I rate midfield controlling a lot (big Xhaka fan) but the EPL is a different beast, especially with the high-pressure system we play. Once you get past Locatelli, that's it. He's out. Even Xhaka is more valuable out of possession.
Locatelli is not a bad player by any means (and I'll be satisfied with him) but he simply replaces Xhaka while being worse out of possession. Unless he can somehow add more value than Xhaka does with his possession play, our midfield pivot is going to DOWNGRADE SLIGHTLY with Loc.
That West Ham game, for instance, we don't make it back from 3-0 down with Locatelli instead of Xhaka. Midfield passing was good but transitions are inevitable and winning the ball back quickly and pinning teams back high up was more important to sustaining our attack than tempo.
Just admit that you just want a pretty player. Locatelli could turn out better than Xhaka because of the age difference but I doubt it. You must remember that the Serie A is a slower, more careful game. EPL is a different beast and we need PnP anyway you look at it.
If Locatelli was as defensively capable as Xhaka, that alone would make me very excited but Xhaka was a player that could deal with EPL wingers without much trouble and actually was great at intercepting and positioning (which covers for his lack of recovery pace).
Locatelli doesn't have the same defensive attributes and he isn't likely going to be much better than Xhaka in possession.
All that said, the downgrade would be marginal and there's still a good chance we've got some kind of Gundogan so my complaints are not really heavy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Understand this, I have nothing to gain from being a constant supporter of what the new regime at Arsenal does. AFTV built an empire from suckling off negativity and we're not yet out of the gutters. However, too much irrationality surrounds fandom.
I am an extremely rational individual. At least in studying large, fluid bodies of knowledge and situations. It's only through rationalism that you can understand irrationality and spot it from a mile away.
Let's look at the Saliba situation again.
William Saliba is a very talented young defender whose signing delighted me a lot, though it was expensive. He has the raw profile to be a massive success for Arsenal. But right now, in this moment, he is at best an OK defender. He is not yet a brilliant or assertive player.
The Sassuolo midfielder is a pretty good central midfielder but is not (too) exactly what we need. In terms of how he's used and the spaces he occupies at Sassuolo, he's pretty much identical to Xhaka, which is a good thing. But
we have a specific system here, a goal to maximize the team's potential and a need to reach that goal as quickly as possible. Basically, we need to increase the overall potential/quality of how we play.
Look at how Ole's system at UTD gradually looked better with better players.
A similar thing is about to occur with Arteta's Arsenal but we need to be careful and thoughtful about who we sign at this point.
You can have many good players who can perform similar roles well for the same team but don't max out the potential of that team at the same levels.
—His general philosophy of adding big amounts of athleticism to the squad, for starters. You can't compete at a top, top level without it, especially in the Premier League. Here's an old quote from The Athletic:
—Ever since he came in, the most solid of all our transfer links (widely reported) have been Gabriel, Partey, Stones, Bissouma, Buendia, Willian, Aouar, Onana, Maddison, White, etc. They are generally (regarded as) pretty good players who mostly (will) improve us.
—Even the sideways Willian signing was pretty much the perfect profile for what Arteta wanted on the wings; creative LW in the halfspaces and wide, play-stretching RW on the flanks. Basically, his targets are specific and planned for a specific system. Means most will work out.
Just realized that England would have been more dangerous in that 1st half if they'd ran the game more through Saka. He simply makes better (micro) decisions than Sterling on the ball (which makes him an equal or better ball carrier) and better suited to receiving and carrying.
So many times Saka took up good positions to receive but the ball never arrived. It looked like someone in the England squad had seen the media attention for Saka and wanted to hog it all for themselves by showing off. It's good in a certain way because it's Raheem Sterling and
not a bum. Saka has to earn his respects in that English super squad and just a few MOTM displays will not do it. It's just how things work in reality when you have quality everywhere like that.
However, tactically, Saka being a primary ball handler would have allowed Sterling
Fans like to complain about everything. I don't really like Ramsdale's profile or whatever we might spend on him. But he's surely not going to be the starting GK and Leno is not going to stay for too long anymore.
Which means that he is a competitive 2nd choice.
There's still space for us to get the top quality GK we need. I don't have to agree with how it's being done or the idea of waiting for Onana on a free. I don't have to like it. But I can surely get behind having a young, HG GK with room to grow as the 2nd choice.
Plus has anyone considered we might be getting Onana for absolutely nothing?
Don't get easily stoked by media reports, my mans.
I have always maintained that if Arsenal get a break (a sugar daddy financier + or a world class coach), they would be one of the most attractive sports brands around, up there with Real Madrid, Barcelona and Manchester United.
Chelsea, despite years of consistent success and the continued decline of traditional top clubs, have not come close to touching the cultural and commercial appeal of a post-Ferguson United because they are fighting for an identity that doesn't belong to them.
I do not claim to know too much but I believe that United own the identity of perennial winners. Chelsea under Abramovich are also trying to base their identity on that. That space is contested in the minds of fans. Even at that, Chelsea lack a distinct footballing style.