Cars are one of the most amazing and wonderful inventions in all of history. They serve us. They connect us. They liberate us.
The future should have lots more cars. Self-driving cars. Flying cars. Space cars! Cars are fantastic.
Nothing else:
* Takes you directly from origin to destination
* Is available instantly on-demand
* Can carry a family and/or packages
* Protects you from the elements
* Is safe to use at night and in all weather
For convenience, practicality, and safety, cars are unbeatable.
Cities should absolutely be designed around cars! Not as an exclusive consideration, but as one of the top considerations.
A city that is unfriendly to cars is a bad city.
Cars were the savior of rural families, ending their isolation. Some farm families ranked having a car above even having a bathroom:
More on the “plauge of rural isolation”:
The transition from urban transit to automobiles was “enthusiastic”. “The twentieth-century urban ridership despised fixed rail transit.”
I am *not* saying that today's cities are designed optimally, or even well! There are probably much better ways we can accommodate many different ways of using and getting around a city. Walking, biking, transit are all great, and we should support those things better too.
I'm just pushing back against the deep, virulent anti-car sentiment I hear so often. People love to hate cars. They are unfairly maligned.
I repeat, cars are fantastic and one of the greatest inventions ever.
Nor am I saying we should design cities “for cars” or “around cars”. Cars aren't the only thing to optimize for, doing so would be unbalanced. But designing “for cars” vs. “for people” is a false dichotomy. People use, enjoy, and benefit from cars!
Incidentally, the value of transportation is super-linear: doubling the range you can travel (within a convenient period of time) quadruples the area and thus the opportunities that you can reach.
Thank you to the small minority of people in this thread who are arguing with me in good faith!
Finally seeing the replies to this thread after getting back from a trip. I assure everyone, I am not serious. The original thread I'm parodying, however, is.
I don't have a SoundCloud to promote. But if you live in Los Angeles, please let @Rendon63rd and @laurafriedman43 know that we need high-speed rail in California to create alternatives to car traffic, using proven and reliable rail technology.
At an SFBOS hearing, a public commenter just said that the University of California is trying to push through its environmental impact report for UCSF before anyone could read its 5,000 pages.
Gotta love CEQA?
George Wooding (West of Twin Peaks Central Council) said that the 1987 MOU for UCSF was great because it forced UCSF to develop land in Mission Bay and Dogpatch for greater hospital capacity.
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a meeting of the Haight-Ashbury Neighborhood Council. David Woo is MCing. Christin Evans will present on the Haight Street Neighborhood Commercial District, and Calvin Welch will present how the Haight voted.
Christin: I had an idea for this recovery plan. I'm also going to highlights from the shopping survey and start a dialogue about it.
Evans: I started worrying about Haight St vacancies in. 2016. A number of storefronts weren't being marketed, left vacant for long periods of time, so I started counting vacancies between Stanyan and Central.
I've received a community meeting notice about a T-Mobile cell antenna project in my neighborhood. I love democracy.
The address corresponds to a building containing apartments over a CVS.
Installing or modifying a wireless antenna requires conditional use authorization in most of the City—including this parcel—which means that a hearing before the Planning Commission will be required.
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a Planning Commission meeting to watch a presentation by Planning Department about Prop H, which voters approved on November 3.
We're on a preceding item, which is a review of land use events at the Board of Supervisors and other boards/commissions. Planning Dept representative Aaron Starr notes that the Whole Foods approved by the Planning Commission in June was subject to a CEQA appeal on Tuesday.
Starr reports that the CEQA appeal was approved because the loading traffic for the Whole Foods was underestimated, since the Planning Commission found that the air quality impacts from loading would fall within acceptable levels.
Hello, San Francisco. I'm attending a meeting of the Coalition for a Complete Community. Haight-Ashbury Neighborhood Council Board Member David Woo is introducing the meeting. There will be a representative from the Mayor's Office later. hanc-sf.org/24-home/570-cc…
Calvin Welch, HANC land use chair, is presenting some background on the project. There have been three affordable housing projects in the Haight-Ashbury neighborhood since the 80s. He makes note of Mercy Family Plaza Apartments, the old Polytechnic High School, + 1 other.
CCC put together a plan with four ideas in mind:
• It should be transit-oriented, with no parking
• It should have mixed-use residential and ground floor commercial
• It should serve seniors, transitional aged youth, and families with children
• There would be an interim use