"SCOTUS, in a 6-3 opinion by Justice Samuel Alito that divided the court along ideological lines, upheld a pair of Arizona election rules that prohibit third parties from collecting mail-in ballots and disallow votes cast in the wrong precinct" wsj.com/articles/supre…
Important excerpts (from the official syllabus):
"Section 2 of the VRA provides vital protection against discriminatory voting rules . . . §2 does not transfer the States’ authority to set non-discriminatory voting rules to the federal courts" >
"Having to identify one’s polling place and then travel there to vote does not exceed the 'usual burdens of voting.' . . .
"A procedure that appears to work for 98% or more of voters to whom it applies—minority and non-minority alike—[does not] render a system unequally open" >
A lot of the people you've heard about the FBI using as informants or trying to use as informants have been in contact with me regarding legal representation over the last couple of years. Names you know.
I have not taken any of them on. But: >
These are the ones we're hearing about.
Do I have any reason to believe anyone I did take on as a client is or was approached by the FBI, or is in fact with the FBI?
No, I have specific reason to think so. But: >
Does this practice by the FBI chill the process whereby I communicate with prospective clients, or accept them as clients? How about the lawlessness of federal law enforcement and intelligence organs & the heedlessness of the federal judiciary to attorney-client privilege? >
The Democrats have officially become the party of antisemitism. And the phony self-appointed "shomer yisroel" @SenSchumer is nowhere to found - surprisingly!