The IEA subscribes to a neoliberal worldview & advocates positions based on this ideology, including climate change denial, & total privatisation - in effect abolition - of OUR #NHS.
The dodgy IEA is secretly funded by Big tobacco, & IEA officers have offered "Cash for Access".
Let's have a look at what Javid said to the bankers, hedge-funders & free-market fundamentalists gathered at the IEA, a think tank funded by Libertarian billionaires & disaster capitalists keen to exploit Britain's last remaining publicly funded institutions, especially OUR #NHS.
Sajid started with obsequious flattery:
"For 60 years now you’ve been thinking the unthinkable, winning hearts & minds & influencing governments from Westminster to Washington to Warsaw & everywhere in between."
Because the IEA isn't a think tank, it's a lobbying organisation.
"A young Sir Antony Fisher was set on a career in politics. But Friedrich Hayek told him that if he really wanted to change the world he should forget about becoming an MP, & start a think-tank instead! I don’t know if that means I’m in the wrong job!"
Javid IS in the wrong job.
Sir Antony Fisher invented The Institute for Economic Affairs - the first modern think tank - back in the 1950s.
It is the template for practically all the think tanks today.
Fisher himself went on to found another 150 think tanks around the world, including the Atlas Network.
Fisher worked with Major Oliver Smedley, fighting a lonely battle against the state planning that was trying to reconstruct Britain after the war - including OUR #NHS - because they were convinced that it was going to lead to 'a totalitarian state' & the 'end of democracy'. 🤪
Hayek suggested to Fisher that the #IEA should masquerade as a "scholarly institute", while behind that - like many free market think tanks - it would really function as an ideologically motivated PR organisation.
Major Smedley was clear about the IEA's mission, saying it was:
Javid went on: "But I do know that we should all be very grateful for Hayek’s intervention. Because the think-tank Sir Antony established, would go on to play a huge and important role in political & economic history."
The IEA's real mission is to change the climate of opinion.
Javid expressed his ❤️ for deregulated free-market fundamentalism & for neoliberal/Libertarian head cases Hayek, Friedman, & Minford:
"It both reflected & deeply influenced my views, helping to develop the economic & political philosophy that guides me to this day."
"I have never been in any doubt that free enterprise is the best way to bring prosperity to as many people as possible. That the free market can solve not just economic problems, but social ones too."
Do you understand why we should all be extremely worried about our #NHS yet?
"A strong economy will never be delivered by attacking big business, or by endlessly raising taxes, or wrapping innovators up in RED TAPE. That’s why my Enterprise Bill will free businesses from another £10 billion of needless regulation. That’s why we’ll keep on cutting taxes!"
Javid starts foaming: "During the COLD WAR, the physical bulwark against COMMUNISM was provided by the formidable military might of the NATO alliance. But throughout that time the ideological bulwark, the theoretical & philosophical defence, was BRIGADED by the likes of the IEA!"
"WHILE OUR TROOPS & BOMBS & PLANES PROTECTED THE WEST FROM THE RED ARMY, IN THE BATTLE OF IDEAS OUR GENERALS WERE SIR ANTONY, LORD HARRIS (ex-Bruges Group Chair & director of Murdoch's Times) & ARTHUR SELDON (invited Friedman to the IEA, influencing Enoch Powell & Thatcher)".
The utterly delusional Sajid Javid is now frothing: "THE FREE MARKET IS THE MOST EFFICIENT, MOST ENDURING, MOST EFFECTIVE SYSTEM EVER DEVISED BY MANKIND!"
It's leading to catastrophic climate change & grotesque wealth accumulation - $30 TRILLION is horded offshore by IEA-lovers.
"President Reagan was talking about democracy when he said that that freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. But HIS idea – that freedom is not passed on but must be fought for, protected & defended – applies equally to free market!"
YOU WHAT?
"We neglect it at our peril & if we fail to support it, it could still crumble in the face of countless tiny attacks. As George W Bush put it in slightly more succinct terms during the global financial crisis: “this sucker could go down”."
In 2004, Javid was MD of Deutsche bank.
"If the price of FREEDOM is eternal vigilance, then we will always need the likes of the IEA to be THE WATCHMEN FOR CAPITALISM. We will always need the heirs of Fisher, Harris & Seldon to make the case for free enterprise, to be its last line of defence & first line of ATTACK!"
And if you *still* think OUR #NHS is safe in the hands of Sajid Javid (who just a few weeks ago was earning a fortune from dodgy banking giant JP Morgan) & our corrupt cabal of lying free-market fundamentalist charlatans, you're a bloody idiot, & you don't deserve OUR #NHS. 👍
To spell out why, we need to unpack both the underlying implication of Andrew Doyle's argument and the reasons why it fails to adequately account for contemporary political dangers.
Andrew Doyle asserts that the term "fascism" is misused to the point of recklessness, echoing George Orwell’s 1944 observation that the word had been rendered meaningless. Doyle’s concern is not uncommon—but imho, it’s ultimately misplaced, especially in today’s context.
While it’s true that “fascism” is sometimes deployed rhetorically or hyperbolically (eg by Trump), Doyle’s framing dangerously downplays the genuine resurgence of fascist-adjacent movements across the Western world and undermines the analytical clarity necessary to confront them.
Boris Johnson appears to have had a secret meeting with billionaire Peter Thiel - perhaps the most fanatical of the libertarian Oligarchs and co-founder of the controversial US data firm Palantir, the year before it was given a role at the heart of the UK’s pandemic response.
The hour-long afternoon meeting on 28 August 2019 was marked “private” in a log of Johnson’s activities that day and was not subsequently disclosed on the government’s public log of meetings.
Elon Musk has been amplifying far-right accounts again, including Tommy Robinson, Rupert Lowe, and numerous anonynmous known #disinformation superspreader accounts like 'End Wokeness'.
Let's examine the context for yesterday's march in Richard Tice's constituency, #Skegness.
After decades of neglect, Skegness (pop 20K), stands out on key socio-economic markers on national averages: residents are older; whiter; lower full-time employment; higher rates of few/no qualifications; and concentrated deprivation - it's far-more deprived than most of England.
History repeatedly teaches us that burdening already struggling communities is a recipe for disaster.
These communities have been crying out for help for DECADES, but successive UK Govts have largely ignored their pleas, and continued to increase inequality, which harms us all.
🧵 @Rylan Asylum seekers coming here aren’t technically "illegal." International law (the 1951 Refugee Convention) allows people to seek asylum in any country regardless of how they arrive or how many countries they pass through, as long as they're fleeing persecution or danger.
Allow me to explain why asylum seekers aren’t “illegal”, and how misinformation and nasty demonising and scapegoating rhetoric by certain politicians and media, including news media, has made some British people less welcoming of asylum seeekers.
@Rylan
People fleeing war, torture, or persecution have the legal right to seek asylum.
The 1951 Refugee Convention, which the UK helped write, says anyone escaping danger can apply for asylum in another country no matter how they arrive: claiming asylum isn't a crime.
Farage's illiberal, immoral, & unworkable authoritarian plan involves ripping up human rights laws forged after WWII, which protect British people, & wasting £billions of UK taxpayers' money, giving some of it to corrupt misogynistic totalitarian regimes. theguardian.com/politics/2025/…
Leaving the #ECHR, repealing the Human Rights Act and disapplying international conventions
The UK would be an outlier among European democracies, in the company of only Russia and Belarus, if it were to leave the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
Opting out of treaties such as the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, the UN Convention against torture and the Council of Europe Anti-Trafficking Convention would also be likely to do serious harm to the UK’s international reputation.
It could also undermine current return deals, including with France, and other cooperation agreements on people-smuggling with European nations such as Germany.
The Society of Labour Lawyers said the plan would “in all likelihood preclude further cooperation and law enforcement in dealing with small boats coming from the continent and so increase, rather than reduce, the numbers reaching our shores”.
Farage said he would legislate to remove the “Hardial Singh” safeguards – a reference to a legal precedent that sets limits on the Home Office’s immigration detention powers – to allow indefinite detention for immigration purposes. This would be highly vulnerable to legal challenge.
Many of the rights protected by the ECHR and the Human Rights Act are rooted in British case law, so judges would still be able to prevent deportations, even without international conventions.
Reform UK’s grotesque far-right mass deportation plan is not just economically and socially illiterate (Britain an ageing population and low birth rate) rely on striking “returns agreements” with countries including Afghanistan, Iran, Eritrea and Sudan, offering financial incentives to secure these deals, alongside visa restrictions and potential sanctions on countries that refuse.
These are countries where the Home Office’s risk reports warn of widespread torture and persecution.
It would risk the scenario of making payments to countries such as Iran, whose regime the UK government has accused of plotting terror attacks on British soil.
The Liberal Democrats called the payments “a Taliban tax”, saying the plan would entail sending billions “to an oppressive regime that British soldiers fought and died to defeat”. They said: “Not a penny of taxpayers’ money should go to a group so closely linked to terrorist organisations proscribed by the UK.”
A reminder of the one, viewed 310,000 times, for which she was jailed, which urged people to burn down asylum seeker hotels after the #Southport attack - which had nothing to do with asylum seekers.
While all these tweets of Connolly's were made before her incendiary post, they don't say which year they were posted.
They can be accessed here, via The Wayback Machine, which has archived more than 916 billion web pages.
Connolly's tweet (top right) was in response to the tweet on the left, which criticised Laurence Fox for posting an upskirt photograph of Narinder Kaur.
The next one (right centre) was Connolly asking Kaur if she had 'flashed her gash'.