The IEA subscribes to a neoliberal worldview & advocates positions based on this ideology, including climate change denial, & total privatisation - in effect abolition - of OUR #NHS.
The dodgy IEA is secretly funded by Big tobacco, & IEA officers have offered "Cash for Access".
Let's have a look at what Javid said to the bankers, hedge-funders & free-market fundamentalists gathered at the IEA, a think tank funded by Libertarian billionaires & disaster capitalists keen to exploit Britain's last remaining publicly funded institutions, especially OUR #NHS.
Sajid started with obsequious flattery:
"For 60 years now you’ve been thinking the unthinkable, winning hearts & minds & influencing governments from Westminster to Washington to Warsaw & everywhere in between."
Because the IEA isn't a think tank, it's a lobbying organisation.
"A young Sir Antony Fisher was set on a career in politics. But Friedrich Hayek told him that if he really wanted to change the world he should forget about becoming an MP, & start a think-tank instead! I don’t know if that means I’m in the wrong job!"
Javid IS in the wrong job.
Sir Antony Fisher invented The Institute for Economic Affairs - the first modern think tank - back in the 1950s.
It is the template for practically all the think tanks today.
Fisher himself went on to found another 150 think tanks around the world, including the Atlas Network.
Fisher worked with Major Oliver Smedley, fighting a lonely battle against the state planning that was trying to reconstruct Britain after the war - including OUR #NHS - because they were convinced that it was going to lead to 'a totalitarian state' & the 'end of democracy'. 🤪
Hayek suggested to Fisher that the #IEA should masquerade as a "scholarly institute", while behind that - like many free market think tanks - it would really function as an ideologically motivated PR organisation.
Major Smedley was clear about the IEA's mission, saying it was:
Javid went on: "But I do know that we should all be very grateful for Hayek’s intervention. Because the think-tank Sir Antony established, would go on to play a huge and important role in political & economic history."
The IEA's real mission is to change the climate of opinion.
Javid expressed his ❤️ for deregulated free-market fundamentalism & for neoliberal/Libertarian head cases Hayek, Friedman, & Minford:
"It both reflected & deeply influenced my views, helping to develop the economic & political philosophy that guides me to this day."
"I have never been in any doubt that free enterprise is the best way to bring prosperity to as many people as possible. That the free market can solve not just economic problems, but social ones too."
Do you understand why we should all be extremely worried about our #NHS yet?
"A strong economy will never be delivered by attacking big business, or by endlessly raising taxes, or wrapping innovators up in RED TAPE. That’s why my Enterprise Bill will free businesses from another £10 billion of needless regulation. That’s why we’ll keep on cutting taxes!"
Javid starts foaming: "During the COLD WAR, the physical bulwark against COMMUNISM was provided by the formidable military might of the NATO alliance. But throughout that time the ideological bulwark, the theoretical & philosophical defence, was BRIGADED by the likes of the IEA!"
"WHILE OUR TROOPS & BOMBS & PLANES PROTECTED THE WEST FROM THE RED ARMY, IN THE BATTLE OF IDEAS OUR GENERALS WERE SIR ANTONY, LORD HARRIS (ex-Bruges Group Chair & director of Murdoch's Times) & ARTHUR SELDON (invited Friedman to the IEA, influencing Enoch Powell & Thatcher)".
The utterly delusional Sajid Javid is now frothing: "THE FREE MARKET IS THE MOST EFFICIENT, MOST ENDURING, MOST EFFECTIVE SYSTEM EVER DEVISED BY MANKIND!"
It's leading to catastrophic climate change & grotesque wealth accumulation - $30 TRILLION is horded offshore by IEA-lovers.
"President Reagan was talking about democracy when he said that that freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. But HIS idea – that freedom is not passed on but must be fought for, protected & defended – applies equally to free market!"
YOU WHAT?
"We neglect it at our peril & if we fail to support it, it could still crumble in the face of countless tiny attacks. As George W Bush put it in slightly more succinct terms during the global financial crisis: “this sucker could go down”."
In 2004, Javid was MD of Deutsche bank.
"If the price of FREEDOM is eternal vigilance, then we will always need the likes of the IEA to be THE WATCHMEN FOR CAPITALISM. We will always need the heirs of Fisher, Harris & Seldon to make the case for free enterprise, to be its last line of defence & first line of ATTACK!"
And if you *still* think OUR #NHS is safe in the hands of Sajid Javid (who just a few weeks ago was earning a fortune from dodgy banking giant JP Morgan) & our corrupt cabal of lying free-market fundamentalist charlatans, you're a bloody idiot, & you don't deserve OUR #NHS. 👍
Politicians, right-wing news media and far-right extremists opportunistically exploit public concern over asylum seekers in hotels, inciting protests and potential violence.
How did we get here? And why the gulf between public perception and reality?
The government spent nearly a third less on hotels to house asylum seekers between April 2024 and March 2025.
The Home Office's annual accounts show £2.1bn was spent on hotel accommodation - an average of about £5.77m per day, down from £3bn or £8.3m per day, the previous year.
GB "News", which employs 75% of Reform UK MPs, is not a news channel - it's Reform's propaganda wing, co-funded by billionaire Paul Marshall and Dubai-based investment firm Legatum, who see it as an investment opportunity to help protect their wealth and interests.
@Ofcom
In the UK, since 1990, 'due impartiality' and 'due accuracy' have been fundamental components of broadcasting - especially for news and current affairs - and imho are essential for a well-informed citizenry and a fair-minded functional democracy.
GB "News" appears to disagree.
The first broadcasting standards in the UK emerged with the BBC in 1922.
Formal standards took shape with the Royal Charter in 1927, which mandated that the BBC provide information, education, and entertainment while maintaining impartiality and serving the public interest.
Voters need to know how right-wing populist nationalist politicians and radical/far-right nativist extremists construct their divisive discourse and rhetoric to exploit the anti-elite climate and fuel violence and division - and what to do about it.
So what can be done to counter divisive narratives and framing and to help Britain to become a more open, inclusive, fairer, less polarised and better multicultural society?
I make several suggestions in the above article, but make more below,
Countering the extreme right’s narrative of feeling "attacked" and needing to "defend" national identity requires a strategic, multi-faceted approach that challenges their framing while addressing underlying concerns and emotions.
The shameless lie that "Britain is lawless" is categorically false, as it contradicts empirical data on crime trends, rule of law metrics, and the functioning of UK institutions. Reform UK often use fearmongering exaggeration and selective framing to create a sense of crisis.
Official data from the ONS and Home Office indicate that overall crime rates in England and Wales have fluctuated but do not support the notion of a "lawless" state. The ONS reported a 7% decrease in total recorded crime (excluding fraud) from 2023 to 24.
#OnThisDay, 21 July, 1969, the Chicago Daily News published: The ‘love it or leave it’ nonsense, by Sydney J. Harris.
It began: One of the most ignorant and hateful statements that a person can make is “If you don’t like it here, why don’t you leave?”
I reproduce it, below.
Harris was born in London in 1917, moving to the US in 1922. A formidable journalist who established a distinct voice integrating incisive social commentary with wit and humour, his weekday column, ‘Strictly Personal’, was syndicated in 200 US newspapers.
The ‘love it or leave it’ nonsense, by Sydney J. Harris.
One of the most ignorant and hateful statements that a person can make is “If you don’t like it here, why don’t you leave?”
That attitude is the main reason America was founded, in all its hope and energy and goodness.
A few thoughts on Bob Vylan leading the #GlastonburyFestival crowd in chants of "Death to the IDF" (Israeli Defence Force), livestreamed by the @BBC, and the mischaracterisation of the chant by some MPs, news media, and activists.
In England, where #GlastonburyFestival is located, all of us have the right to freely express our criticism of anyone or anything - as long as there is no intent to provoke immediate unlawful violence or there is a reasonable likelihood it will occur as a consequence.
In England, free speech is protected under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998. However, inciting violence is a criminal offence under several laws which attempt to balance public safety with free expression rights.