Let me paint a scenario for you, and then you can judge for yourself.
1. A complete and total grid-down situation coast to coast.
2. No improvement in the first three weeks, but then some progress.
1/
1. A complete and total grid-down situation coast to coast.
2. No improvement in the first three weeks, but then some progress.
1/
3. FEMA announces that they will have some power restoration by week 6.
4. When week 6 arrives, everyone will have had all the suffering and discomfort they can take.
5. FEMA announces that they can only restore power in limited areas, and cities are the main focal point.
2/
4. When week 6 arrives, everyone will have had all the suffering and discomfort they can take.
5. FEMA announces that they can only restore power in limited areas, and cities are the main focal point.
2/
6. People are instructed to make their way to one of several designated "safe zones", where they will be offered "pod" type housing, but with full electricity and a functioning internet, etc.
7. People will be "assigned work" in an area where their skills fit in exchange.
3/
7. People will be "assigned work" in an area where their skills fit in exchange.
3/
8. Also in exchange for your labor, you will be provided food, but due to the emergency, it will be vegan or bug-based proteins.
9. Living outside the safe zones will be prohibited.
If you think this is far-fetched, you should read the Defense Production Act .
4/
9. Living outside the safe zones will be prohibited.
If you think this is far-fetched, you should read the Defense Production Act .
4/
You should also read what the government is authorized to do under Title 50 in a "War or National Emergency".
Also, if you think the government wouldn't kill a lot of people to make this happen, you haven't been paying attention.
End/
Also, if you think the government wouldn't kill a lot of people to make this happen, you haven't been paying attention.
End/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
