I was holding off on doing a🧵on Dr. Maxmen, as she seemed to back off after trying to gaslight everyone into doubting their own eyes. Given her self-admitted memory issues, I'd expect far more caution. Instead, she's back to bullying, and the memory issues are worse than ever.
On the memory issues, here's a thread describing the incident, and her response underneath. Of course as the person replying to her says, the photo should have jogged her memory before the accused others of doctoring.
Here is Dr. Maxmen bullying @R_H_Ebright, among many other honors, recipient of the "American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology/Schering-Plough Research Achievement Award" by calling him a "chemist": twitter.com/search?q=chemi…
Here is Dr. Maxmen going after established professors, calling to question their very expertise:
Dr Maxmen does not seem to be very familiar with how the investigations for the zoonotic origins of SARS progressed. But that doesn't stop her attacking the factcheckers:
Perhaps female journalists who succeeded in a difficult industry with far more experience than her, like @KatherineEban would make her sit up and listen? Well, if it wasn't for that *technical nuance*, perhaps she would.
And if you get any ideas on writing on this whole leak business, just make sure you're not *divisive*. Because truth is found through *not* challenging the narrative or the establishment. nature.com/articles/d4158…
Because when it comes to pursuing the truth, the most important thing is to consider the consequences. You might not know what you will find out, but Dr Maxmen knows why you shouldn't even try:
I'd like to wrap this thread on a positive note, so let's revisit one of Dr Maxmen's favorite moments, when she shared a panel with a prominent authority on conflicts of interest, Dr Peter Daszak: c-span.org/video/?404875-…
With this in mind, please re-read the message that triggered this thread. If nothing else, my accusations are house-trained, and if I thought she was an idiot I would not be writing this thread. Maybe some memory issues, but that's what 🧵s are for.
More: Dr Maxmen published a piece in Nature accusing a DRASTIC member of abusive comments towards Dr Angela Rasmussen. She's been told that she must have confused two people sharing the name Kevin. The abuser has never been part of DRASTIC. She hasn't corrected the falsehood.
I hope the editor at @nature who is now notified fixes this eggergious error promptly. To harass @DavidRelman for comment on this fairytale was a violation of journalistic trust, and to not correct it when pointed out proves ill intent.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I want to write a few things about Dr. W. Ian Lipkin or as we call him in my household, *Dr Lynchpin*. He is the in the middle of many networks in virology, but at the same time he is somewhat of a maverick. Plays the game, but eventually finds his way to doing the right thing.🧵
Lipkin, early in the pandemic, was *everywhere*. Just between Jan 20 and Jan 30, he was quoted on 18 different articles, some times 3 articles in the same day! This continued up until March, when the infamous "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2" came out, with him as one author.
Lipkin was one of the few that George Gao, the head of the Chinese CDC, called on New Year's Eve 2020 to give him the down-low on the new virus. He also is one of only two scientists to claim he knew something was up before the last days of December 2019:
Widespread daisy-chaining will change hardware forever. Most peripherals connect back to a mainboard that must know the number of peripherals in advance, and everything must travel back all the way. Daisychaining fixes that.
Quick review in case you think daisy-chain is something to do with flowers: The daisychaining pattern is to connect many devices together not by connecting each to a central hub, but by connecting each to the previous one, somewhat like the links in a chain.
First and foremost: power. This one is easy, but also easy to forget. You can power any number of devices in the same line. So long as they use the same voltage, and you have enough amperage, daisychaining power is the way to go. What for you ask? I'm glad you did.
... aaaaand @ComicDaveSmith jumps the shark. Dave, you're doing great with your work with Mises caucus. And in principle objections to lockdowns are understandable. But *do not* tell people the delta variant is not more dangerous. At the very least the science is not clear yet.
If your philosophy is that lockdowns or restrictions are unacceptable that's totally up to you, or if it's that the government can't be trusted to implement them, again fine. It's irresponsible to say the data is somehow exaggerated. We don't yet know, it's too new.
Protect your reputation, we need voices that are sane and not be tarred with strong positions that are risky to take unless you really know what you are talking about. The doctors I watch are very concerned, and trust me they are not in Fauci's pocket, so it doesn't seem as clear
Do we have examples where a paradigm shift in a field came from the core members / inner circle of the field itself?
Semelweis' Germ theory came from an "assistant" doctor at a hospital in Vienna. The field rejected his findings (and the implication that they were at fault) so strongly that his mental health broke down and he died in an asylum at 47. explorable.com/semmelweis-ger…
Plate tectonics took 45 years to be properly accepted, being highly contentious much of the time in between 1915 and 1960 - visionlearning.com/en/library/Ear…
Principally, she insists work was done in BSL-4, when in fact Shi Zhengli has clearly said the work was being done in BSL-2 and BSL-3. Who do we believe? sciencemag.org/sites/default/…
Anderson: “If people were sick, I assume that I would have been sick—and I wasn’t,” she said. “I was tested for coronavirus in Singapore before I was vaccinated, and had never had it.”
Koopmans: nbcnews.com/nightly-news/v…
After digging into December 2019 COVID-19 events, a significant cluster of... shadows relating to September and October 2019 emerged. This is the thread in which we'll gather everything unusual from August 2019 to mid-December 2019, just so we've got a net wide enough.