Time for another Truman Show, Only this time Truman is wearing a Nerd Sweater.
Many of you probably witnessed the 6 MDPI editor rage quit this the weekend over this manuscript that attempted to look at adverse events of the experimental shot that shall not be named.
The knee jerk reaction from Team Panic was that MDPI was a Predatory Journal and the paper should be retracted, censored, sworn at, and ejected into space, never to return.

Then this crowd began to realize all of their Vax-Pimp hero's were on the editorial board.
Oops Image
Then a controlled Rage quite chain reaction ensued that seemed to be contained to only those editors donning Nerd Sweaters.
The most predictable of course was Grand Poobah Florian Krammer, known for how loaded with Gates money he is. Image
Next up in the Vax Tyrant Tirade was Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris.
Chair of the WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety.
Chair of this Vax Network with Gates Funding. Image
This one is juicy.
Connected to Fondation Merieux.
This is a charity from the Merieux family which many of you may recall, is tight buddies with the CCP and funded the building of the P4 lab in Wuhan.
globalvaccinedatanetwork.org/partners/ Image
3rd in line for lemming like leadership in the quit machine... You guessed it. Gates Money.
Katie Ewer
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33306989/ ImageImage
Maybe there is an independent thought in here?
Diane Harper from Michigan. You can thank her for the Gardasil nightmare. Image
4/4. Maybe we'll get lucky with Rage quitter #5.
Paul Licciardi- Murdochs

Nope. Image
And the last Nerd Sweater Rage quitter is Andrew Pekosz from John Hopkins... I mean Bill Hopkins University. I dont see obvious direct funding here but with the amount of Nerd Sweater money in JHU, I can't imagine how anyone there would spit on the ring.
npr.org/sections/goats… Image
So this rage quitting got the Journal to issue a letter of concern which is foreshadowing a retraction. The main complaint:

Deaths after vaccination are not causal but coincidental.
OK- The authors don't make such hard claims but lets be fair and apply that to the qPCR test?
Authors provide a calm response to such criticism.
If you don't trust the Lareb-ADR data.. why are we collecting it? If Death post vax is coincidence, then death 28 days after qPCR is also coincidence and we must be honest not asymmetric.

The Cherry on Top.
MDPI (the Journal) also has Gates Money.

It didn't take long for Science magazine to pile on. Out comes this one sided smear campaign on the paper.
It's basically a "STAY IN YOUR LANE!" fallacy smear.
You are not allowed to do Numerator/Denominator math without a license.. or a Nerd Sweater.
Not a simple journalistic check. Don't even go an inch deep on the corporate conflicts that exist in this Journal. Clueless to the hundreds of Millions of dollars the Gates Foundation has invested in BioNtech and CureVac.
Maybe this is because these journals are a mirage of a distributed consensus. AAAS also has money from Nerd Sweaters.This deal expired
We need to decentralize peer review and make it Peer to Peer. Dis-intermediate the 3rd parties which invite conflicts.
There is a way to do this with Bitcoin.
Peer to Peer currency. Immutable ledgers. No need for a Journal. Ultimate transparency. No advertisement/Nerd Sweater in the picture.

But what do I know? I don't have a sweater.
Does the author of the science article look like a neutral party on this?
The next chapter in rage quite caravan,
Walach is fired from his monoversity.

Lareb_NL who critiqued Walach for use of their unverified data...
Published a paper 2 weeks later claiming the same data is verified.

Journal violates its own journalistic ethics during retraction.
We expect nothing less from team hypocrisy.
The Vatican conference calls out the Vax Pimps.

Cancel culture is not afraid to cheat to achieve their ends.
Notice how they framed this retraction.
Didn’t give the authors anytime to respond despite the authors assuring them they had a response in preparation.
Violation of COPE ethics. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Kevin McKernan 🙂

Kevin McKernan 🙂 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kevin_McKernan

15 Jul
Must commend @infoecho @SethOregon @PhaseGenomics @MediGenomics @PacBio
This is pretty tight Hi-C map out of the gate for a genome. HiFi 20kb/13Kb library, assembled with Peregrine. HiC with Phase Genomics and we have 26 Scaffolds, many Tip to Tip. Psilocybe cubensis. Image
This is a chromatin capture Map of the genome of Psilocybe cubensis.

This is a method that cross links the protein spools that organize the chromosomes.

By doing so, you gain an understanding of which pieces of the genome are in proximity.

Each box in the Map with a hot diagnol line is a chromosome or arm of a chromosome.
Read 4 tweets
14 Jul
The Credibility Trap.
When you want things to be true, you are most exposed to getting burned.

Let's examine the David Martin video that is going viral and see if it passes a few sniff tests.
Here is his dossier.
It makes two claims about collusion with the CDC and Ralph Baric.
1)CDC illegally patented the SARs virus
2)Ralph Baric locked up all research on the synthetic versions of these.

Let us look at the CDC patent.
CDC patent was filed in the US in 2003 before Myriad case law. This means Diamond vs Chakrabarty set the legal precedence and natural sequence was patent eligible under 35-US-101. This contradicts David’s claims.
Don’t believe me. You can look this up in the USPTO PAIR system.
Read 32 tweets
13 Jul
The Rage Quitter Cancel Cult has outdone themselves again.

The most frightening aspect of this story is the journals willingness to violate its own code of ethics to lay sacrament to the vax god.

Still waiting for a coherent argument for retraction. All arguments seem to stem from correlation isn’t causation.

Or the database isn’t trustworthy.

Fair point that would induce word smithing not retraction according to the journals code of ethics.
The fact that the Adverse Events Database isn’t trustworthy, isn’t the authors fault.

The fact that people insist the jab is safe while admitting the Database is broken is cognitive covidissonance.

Why else collect the data?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!