Bennett changes his tone entirely depending upon the perceived bend of the outlet.
Here's what's wrong about this. A thread 👇
t.me/ArizonaAuditLi…
Here's what's wrong about this. A thread 👇
t.me/ArizonaAuditLi…
-The batching disparity he mentions at :42 is arbitrary based on the audit, there's nothing nefarious. In fact, it's concerning since it's unknown at this moment if the ballots remain grouped in their original batches.
-1:16: "the county finally admitted that they had never given these documents, some documents called blue sheets that explain how they took ballots out of batches and sent them to duplication."
They didn't include it because the subpoena didn't ask for it per county response.
They didn't include it because the subpoena didn't ask for it per county response.
3:51 - the host says the blue sheet/batch disparity is incompetence. The guy's a fool and has no idea what he is talking about. It's a separate step.
4:50 - Bennett makes it sound like the county hurriedly packs up the ballots for destruction, implying that they don't want anyone to know about fraud. Again, tone change.
6:32 - Bennett talks about the early ballot fold fallacy. We've already established...multiple times...that not all early ballots will be folded.
7:00 "We are told from people that worked for Maricopa County that (thousands) of those envelopes don't have signatures and shouldn't have been opened."
That's a pretty egregious charge. No one should throw that out w/out evidence up front.
That's a pretty egregious charge. No one should throw that out w/out evidence up front.
7:24 "We'd still like to do a third party tabulation of the dominion images to see if dominion was messing around with the tabulation."
Again...throwing out the red meat early to people already primed to believe fraud happened. Not responsible.
Again...throwing out the red meat early to people already primed to believe fraud happened. Not responsible.
8:51 Bennett implies that there are 118 Terebytes of P-cap data. I'm not a networking specialist but I don't think the county could generate that network traffic in a year. This has to be the sum total of data.
That's all of it. Frustrating to see how when talking to certain outlets the tone shifts dramatically to infer that fraud occurred. In pool interviews, Bennett was always very even keel.
A detractor (who I blocked for not being able to detract without insulting) made the point that interviewees often change their tone when speaking with different outlets, and it's true.
But this is supposed to be a boring, accounting driven audit. There should be no tone shift.
But this is supposed to be a boring, accounting driven audit. There should be no tone shift.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
