The PCA general assembly voted to pass Overture 23 with an overwhelming majority. The overture states, in part, that same-sex attraction is a sin & that calling yourself gay or same-sex attracted disqualifies you from office.

Behold, Christian “love.”
A few additional notes:

Some are saying that this overture only disqualifies gay people from holding office if they deny that same-sex attraction is a sin, deny sanctification, or fail to pursue victory over their sinful desires. In other words, calling yourself gay is okay.
In fact, that is patently not the intention of this overture. Discussion amongst its supporters explicitly expressed their desire to prevent people from calling themselves gay or same-sex attracted. See here from @TheGrantHartley:
Denny Burk, in his paraphrase of the overture, sums it up like this:
The intention of this overture is clear: they don’t want gay people calling themselves gay. Not even that, that don’t want them even calling themselves same-sex attracted. They don’t want gay people talking about themselves, PERIOD.
Worse, the overture states that gay people must declare that same-sex attraction is a sin. Forcing sexual minorities to declare that even their ATTRACTION is a sin, apart from any act or behavior on their part, is cruel.
This basically forces gay people to say that they are living in perpetual and uncontrollable sin all day long JUST for being gay. Where is the overture stating the same for straight people & disqualifying them from office? You won’t see it.
Worse, what we see here is the set up for a kind of double jeopardy. The overture is worded in such a way that a gay person could be ousted at the accusation of anyone for just about anything.
If gay people “deny the hope or reality of progressive sanctification” they are disqualified from office. In practice, gay Christians know this will be used to enforce conversion therapy under the guise of “sanctification.”
Gay ppl will be asked if they are daily praying for God to remove their same-sex attraction, if they are actively pursuing the smallest, faintest glimmer of attraction to the opposite sex, if they are “open” to getting heterosexually married should they find a “good match.”
All of the above is just the tip of the iceburg of proving that you are progressing in your sanctification, and no matter how “sanctified” you make your life, there will ALWAYS be more “sanctification” that you need to prove. It will never be enough.
Eventually, your inability to demonstrate sufficient hope in your own sanctification will lay the grounds for your dismissal. This is not a hypothetical. I’ve seen this happen enough times in enough churches to know this is how the above language will be used.
Finally, saying that gay people must pursue “spirit empowered victory” over their “sinful temptations” is code language for “any indication that this is a continuing source of struggle in your life means we kick you out.”
Gay people will be forced to bury their life and experiences underneath a mask of heterosexual normalcy. If they want to speak openly about anything they experience, they will risk being accused of not living in “victory” over their sin.
There will be no room for gay people to be open about their sexuality, speak honestly about their experience with temptation, or confess to any shortcomings because ANY could be used as evidence of failing to live in “victory.”
Again, this is NOT a hypothetical. I have seen it happen over and OVER again. This is how the above language is used, every time. It is a means of kicking gay people out of churches, no matter what we say, do, or believe.
If you think this is not what’s intended by the overture, I am sorry but you are simply wrong. When you’ve been down this road even once, you know where it leads. And I’ve been down it countless times.
The PCA general assembly just passed an overture to homophobia. God have mercy on their unrepentant souls.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bridget Eileen Rivera

Bridget Eileen Rivera Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TravelingNun

1 Jul
Attraction & desire are different things.

Attraction draws us to some people over others. It brings us into *relationship* with human beings.

Desire drives our motivation to *possess.* It brings our *wants* into reality.

Being attracted to someone doesn’t mean you desire them.
It is possible to be attracted to another human being without desiring to do something sinful with them.

Failing to understand this very basic principle leads many to conclude that they have no control over their sinful nature and can’t help but engage in sexual sin.
It creates a domino effect in which mostly men blame the people they are attracted to for supposedly leading them into worse and worse manifestations of sexual sin, harassment, and abuse.
Read 5 tweets
30 Jun
When straight ppl get together to talk about their struggle against sexual sin, it’s normal, expected, part of healthy “accountability,” a way to fight against ongoing temptation.

When gay ppl do the same thing, it’s part of defining ourselves by sin.
I can’t count the number of church community groups I’ve seen for straight men over the years to discuss their ongoing struggles against sexual temptation.
I can’t count the number of PASTORS I’ve seen admit from the PULPIT that they have a porn addiction & keep covenant eyes on their devices to help them stay accountable to their wife and overseers.
Read 6 tweets
25 May
Did you know that according to traditional Christian teaching the vast majority of sexually active *straight* evangelicals are unrepentant sodomites?

In fact, sodomy is traditionally a sin that mostly heterosexual people do. It’s not by definition a gay thing.
How so? Well, traditionally, sodomy is defined as any sexual intercourse that subverts the procreative purpose of sex. Meaning that intentionally preventing baby-making during sex was considered among the worst sins you could possibly do—right up until the 20th century.
"The correct definition of sodomy--then and now--is simply non-procreative sex, whether practiced by heterosexuals or homosexuals. It includes oral sex, masturbation, mutual masturbation, contraceptive sex, coitus interruptus, and anal sex."

newrepublic.com/article/64542/…
Read 10 tweets
28 Apr
People think it’s weird that I’m gay & celibate & don’t find celibacy toxic. They want to know how I “do it.”

To begin with, I don’t start with sin.
Most Christians start their approach to sexual ethics with sin. Why? What good does this do? It creates a theology obsessed with all of the ways we might “fall to temptation” instead of how we might follow the witness of Jesus in our lives.
Jesus came to defeat the power of sin. Why lay our foundations in a thing that Jesus came to abolish?
Read 8 tweets
7 Apr
Did you know the word “lesbian” is falling out of practice in queer spaces?

The reason has everything to do w/ “lesbian” being the ONLY word in the LGBTQ lexicon that refers to women alone.
That’s right. It’s not just the straights uncomfortable with the “L-word.” Even most QUEER WOMEN use the word “gay” to describe themselves before they EVER use “lesbian.”

Why?
Historians observe that words referring to women tend to “derogate” over time. Meaning they become pejoratives. Whereas words referring to men retain their meaning.
Read 23 tweets
31 Mar
LGBTQ people experience some of the highest rates of medical discrimination in the country. When we experience illness, many believe we deserve to be sick & die.

And now it’s legal in Arkansas to deny us ANY healthcare service on the grounds of “moral conscience.”
The only qualifier in this bill is that doctors must provide care in the case of an “emergency.” This is laughable, as the vast majority of healthcare services—many if not most of which are lifesaving—do not fall under the category of “emergency.”
Some argue that the bill does not name LGBTQ people explicitly, so it’s not actually targeting LGBTQ people. Again, this is laughable. We all know what demographics this law is going to be used against the most. Laws like these in the US *always* target LGBTQ people and women.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(