Most outlets make their headlines so understated, you’re baited into clicking on them just to find out what they’re about. Understated headlines are literally clickbait. If Palmer Report’s headlines seem loud in comparison, it’s because we use them to point to the actual story.
Some folks who are new to Palmer Report like to complain about our headlines being too this or too that, because they’re accustomed to the dishonestly understated headlines they see everywhere else. But we’re not going to water down our headlines just to try to fit in.
Every headline we’ve ever run has been justified by the contents of our accompanying article. We don’t owe the complainers anything beyond that.
Palmer Report was created specifically to push back against the mainstream media’s ratings-driven antics, and to push the industry to be more honest. If you find it easer to just believe everything the media tells you and never challenge it, Palmer Report isn’t for you anyway.
So if you’re tempted to send us a ten paragraph email complaining that our headlines are too accurate and not stately-sounding enough, just hit delete and go back to staring at your television instead. There’s nothing we can do to help you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When Trump was in office, he knew he could block federal prosecution, so he’d confess to his crimes and try to play them down. For him it was a PR game. That’s why he confessed last night. But he apparently forgot he’s no longer in office and is vulnerable to prosecution. Oops 😆
We’ll see if New York prosecutors view Trump’s confession last night as having been direct enough to use as evidence. But either way, he’s flaunting his crimes at this point, which surely deepens the resolve of those prosecutors to see this through and indict him.
Does Trump honestly believe he’s still in office?
Is he unaware that these are state, not federal, charges?
We just caught a Wikipedia editor saying this in the talk section: "If a majority of the Palmer Report's peers (or rivals/competitors) call the blog a conspiracy site, then Wikipedia is obligated to follow their lead." Think we now have grounds for serious legal action.
This Wikipedia editor keeps digging himself a deeper hole.
Now he's insisting that I'm "not fully there look up blue anon if you have to And the fact the evidence shows all there that he is a conspiracy theorist."
Huh?
Again this is a Wikipedia editor talking in public 🙄
This same Wikipedia editor is continuing to falsely claim that I tried to "doxx" him – which I obviously did not. Yet another individual who's so obsessed with destroying me, he's willing to risk destroying himself in the process. Profoundly disturbing.
It’s been clear since November 2019 that if Trump lost reelection, he’d end up on a path to prison in New York.
It’s not “speculative” or a “conspiracy theory” to say that Donald Trump is going to prison. It’s the real story. It has been for a year and a half. Now it’s underway.
Stop acting like Palmer Report is doing something weird by saying it. Stop asking why we’ve been the only one saying it for the past year and a half. Start asking the rest of the media why they spent all that time ignoring the fact that New York indictments would come if he lost.
This week’s indictments, which are an obvious precursor for Trump himself being indicted, were always going to happen. Always. Why do you think New York went after his tax returns and banking records and such? This has been an ongoing active criminal investigation since 2019.
Prosecutors have made clear they’ll do whatever necessary to try to get Weisselberg to flip. So they’ll obviously seek a harsh prison sentence. There’s no chance they seek probation or a fine if this heads to trial. And Weisselberg is surely figuring this out.
With these charges and this proof, Weisselberg will almost certainly be convicted. Hoping for acquittal is not a valid strategy for him. His only hope would be if the judge gives him a lenient sentence.
But with prosecutors being this aggressive yeah but instead can you get vanilla ice cream
I’m tired of being targeted, stalked, and harassed by fucking psychos.
TO be clear, most the psychos who do this stuff to me are liberals, and half of them are journalists. They don't do it over a difference of political views; they do it either because they're mentally unstable, or out of professional jealousy.
My political analysis is not remotely controversial (or even important enough) for multiple journalists at major news outlets to have derailed their careers while trying to smear me. And yet it's happened. People (on my political side) destroy themselves trying to destroy me.
Some troll has turned Palmer Report’s Wikipedia page into one big long attack on us, and has removed all of the positive content about us. Can someone please edit the page and remove the garbage? Thanks: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_Re…
Things that are illegitimate about our Wikipedia page:
1) Snopes ended up firing Brooke Binkiwski, after disciplining her for making inappropriate remarks about the news sites she was covering, so her quote about us is illegitimate and should be removed.
2) The Trump-Russia scandal, which was ultimately validated by a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, is not “dubious content” or a “conspiracy theory.” That entire quote should be removed.