Thread by @PalmerReport

Some troll has turned Palmer Report’s Wikipedia page into one big long attack on us, and has removed all of the positive content about us. Can someone please edit the page and remove the garbage? Thanks: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_Re…

Things that are illegitimate about our Wikipedia page:

1) Snopes ended up firing Brooke Binkiwski, after disciplining her for making inappropriate remarks about the news sites she was covering, so her quote about us is illegitimate and should be removed.

2) The Trump-Russia scandal, which was ultimately validated by a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, is not “dubious content” or a “conspiracy theory.” That entire quote should be removed.

3) We were not “shared almost exclusively by Hillary Clinton supporters.” This false claim, which is laughable on its face, should be removed.

4) The prospect of Donald Trump going to prison is not a “conspiracy theory.” His company was just criminally indicted, for crying out loud. This remark needs to be removed.

5) The location of the Trump desk is still disputed, and in any case obviously not important enough to be on Wikipedia page. This nonsense should be removed.

6) Our analysis of the Syrian missile strike was accurate; the respected Lawrence O’Donnell said the same thing. The fact that the Wikipedia editor attacks O’Donnell is proof that this is nothing more than biased right wing hackery, and should be removed.

7) The source of the Ed Markey thing was Louise Mensch, not Palmer Report. This is part of a years-long bizarre effort to tie us to Mensch, someone we were never aligned with. This nonsense should be deleted.

8) Our analysis of the Niger ambush was accurate; the respected Rachel Maddow said the same thing. Again, this Wikipedia editor’s bizarre attack on Maddow makes clear that it’s biased hackery. It should be removed.

9) The entire “reception” section is nothing but baseless whining about Palmer Report written by its competitors. This is obviously all biased and must be removed.

10) In particular, Glenn Greenwald was ousted from the Intercept, and Bethania Palma was ousted from Snopes, this making clear that their whining about us is biased and illegitimate; none of it is in line with Wikipedia’s bias standards.

11) The German Marshall Fund study did NOT categorize us as “false content producers.” The source link doesn’t even support this. Whoever hacked our Wikipedia page made this up; it should be removed.

12) The Columbia Journalism Review study labels Palmer Report as having “bias” but does NOT categorize us as “fake-news, clickbait, and hate sites.” The source link proves this. Again, this is just a made-up lie. It needs to be deleted.

13) The Wikipedia hacker is claiming that “Palmer threatens people.” This is dishonestly out of context, as the source link merely documents me threatening to report trolls and such. This false claim should be deleted.

It looks like some of you are already working to try to clean up the page. Not surprisingly, the rogue “editor” seems to be pushing back. Please keep trying to correct the page. At some point the editor will realize he’s not getting away with the lies and move on. Thank you.

For crying out loud, this rogue Wikipedia editor is comparing us to Breitbart (a white supremacist site) and InfoWars (a site that claims school shootings never happened). This is obviously false on its face. Please help us remove all of these easily disproven lies.