The problem with having fascists in power is that you have to gain power in order to remove them.
In the meantime, they have the full apparatus of state available to them to cement their own grip on power, and make a future defeat less and less likely.
That's why we have things coming up like...
- Draconian anti-protest laws (1+ person protests punishable by a year in jail or 10 years for defacing a statue)
- Mass voter suppression (voter IDs likely to disenfranchise over a million people)
- Sidelining of parliamentary scrutiny
- Boundary changes that favour the Tories
- Possible neutering of the Electoral Commission
- New curbs on online freedom, including (if the idiots have their way) removal of end-to-end encryption. Sure, that will destroy ecommerce and banking, but it will allow wiretapping, so...
What happens a few months down the road if they seek to extend the definition of "protest" to include spoken (TV, radio) and written (newspapers, magazines, books) dissent?
Again under the same juicy conditions that it's the Home Sec who decides...
Takes 3-4 weeks for coronavirus cases to translate into deaths.
3-4 weeks ago, we were around 5,000 to 6,000 new cases a day. Now we're at 27,000.
Do the maths.
And yet, there is a deceit playing out every day in the pages of the tabloids, aided and abetted by willing politicians: the pretense that today's death rate is somehow reflective of today's new caseload.
The pandemic is all about gazing in the rearview mirror. Always has been.
Here's an example from the front page of the Daily Mail website right now...
It actually commits two deceits in one, because it also doesn't account for the fact that the number of deaths reported ALWAYS falls at the weekend. (We're at 15 today, up from 11 this day last week.)
I fear the Government will stop publishing daily coronavirus updates to coincide with the 19 July Lick-Every-Doorknob grand reopening.
Because then there's near zero oversight or accountability. Just whatever prechewed platitudes they dish out at periodic press conferences.
And if they do give up providing data, that's the end of any sort of press analysis too. Sure, a handful of outlets may try and assemble a picture of what's going on from disparate data sources - but the vast majority won't bother because that's work and Love Island is on.
And yet, our situation has possibly never been more precarious...
"Labour has announced a new post-Brexit economic vision for the UK involving ambitious plans to 'make, sell and buy more in Britain' as it seeks to build a strongly patriotic policy platform with which to take on the Tories."
So we've basically got Tory vs Tory Lite, both fighting over the 52% that were 37% of the overall electorate.
Nothing whatsoever for anyone else.
In the face of this arrant nonsense, the LibDems and Greens should figure out what compromises each of them would need to make to merge and carry forward the cream of their policy platforms.
(Even if those compromises were significant, it could still be a promising exercise.)