The death of 43 people at sea doesn't create a fraction of the media attention compared to a pipeline rupture extinguished in 5 hours.
The worsening climate crisis - and pictures on social media - will not shock people into action. What matters is personal, real experience. 1/x
I am not saying the pipeline rupture isn't terrible. But people care for 5 seconds and then move on. In case of shipwrecks hardly anyone cares. That's the risk we are facing with the climate crisis. Everyone getting used to people dying from heat strokes or wildfires. 2/x
And in fact, people are suffering and dying from the climate crisis and resulting air pollution already in the millions every year and it is nearly completely normalised. Covid did prove once again how quickly people can normalise preventable deaths and gov failure. 3/x
In all cases the question is not only how to mobilise those who already care about an issue, but to convince people who are not yet engaged or organised that they should become active and how. And I don't think social media is a useful tool for those conversations. 4/x
A lot more could be done to unite the environmental and anti-racist movements behind common goals of a just transition if the climate movement would focus less on "future generations" and more on actual living people already disadvanted by current social structures. 5/x
It would also help if we wouldn't talk about climate in abstract numbers, energy transition or natural science because env breakdown is only a symptom of unequal power structures like people lacking possibilities for democratic engagement and influence on decision making. 6/x
But my main point is we need to reach out to people who aren't yet engaged in collective struggles and listen to what they actually need right now (probably got more to do with inequality than with environmental issues). We need those people to become collectively organised. 7/x
Political power has become way too centralised in the hands of too few people. People need to find the tools and collective agency to engage on the issues that matter to them personally. Luckily, ressources and skill sharing to support those struggles exist. 8/x
To sum up: social media can't replace real conversations to see what matters to people and help them organise to shift power. People need to see their collective power making a difference. Env problems stem from inequality and changing that is essential for env action. 9/x
For the white middle class, we have to support the people most disadvantaged in the present day, one example are people on the move (support, not victimise!). - This is probably not a well formulated thread but I think it's just too hot here to think properly. 10/10
Side story: my friend's sister in Sudan says the water in the well was so hot in the last heat wave she didn't even need to boil the water to make tea, you could just put a teabag in the water straight away (a joke, of course). She says it's worse than it used to be. 11/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On the topic of my representation in the media. I find it frustrating.
If I see anyone writing an article saying "Carola the voice of the migrants" again, I will seriously consider to never speak to any journalist again. It seems mostly completely pointless.
Here is why.
1/n
First, as anyone can tell you, migrants and refugees have voices of their own. I have never claimed to speak for them. It's completely wrong to make it appear as if I was talking on behalf of someone else, I will never speak "for migrants" as they can speak for themselves.
2/n
I have not given a single interview on "migration" since last autumn. I pass on all those requests. Whenever I give interviews it's about connecting topics of social justice and the environment. Remember, I am an ecologist, not any sort of migration expert.
3/n
I think it's hard to make that hashtag trend cause my understanding is the majority of EU citizens don't know that agency even exists, less so what they do.
/1
The European border agency "protects" the EU external borders at land and sea.
Often, they protect it from people who try to get here to claim asylum. Why do people want to get here at all? Because of massive global inequality, caused by capitalism, colonialism, racism. /2
So what is the Frontex mission then?
An attempt to continue "business as usual", shutting off the globally priviledged EU from the misery we cause around the globe by extraction of resources and cheap labour. They are the guards of Fortress Europe. /3
Today it's the day of #Chernobyl disaster. Many people still suffer from health impacts.
A large part of the contaminated area is now a biosphere reserve (Ukraine & Belarus). Here some short parts of an interview I did in 12/18 with reserve educator Viktoria Melnychuk.
1/x
"A lot of visitors are scared to come here, especially Ukrainians. There was no information. People didn't know what had happened and which process has been made since. We try to change this and provide information."
2/x
"For us it's important to change people's mind. They come here thinking everything is bad and destroyed. They leave thinking that life finds ways to recover from disaster, that things can be restored and that there is hope for our children."
3/x
Apart from rescue capacity we also lack the possibility to see and report what is going on in the Med. This week a Maltese gov vessel refused to rescue and destroyed the engine of a rubber boat as reported in a call to Alarm Phone. /2
What worries me at large is that authorities use the health crisis as an argument to prevent rescue vessels to go out at sea or find safe ports. Even though Libya now declared it's ports unsafe due to war activities and shelling. /3
Since many parents are rightly worried about the police violence, which has cost the lives of several people and left 200 blinded since September, they may not allow their kids to join.
/1
I will be staying in Santiago for the time of the climate conference #COP25 during which activist groups (who can't just easily travel to Madrid) will be organising as